Do Ravens Have The Same Armor Amount As Atlas?
#21
Posted 18 December 2012 - 09:37 AM
I always chalk it up to the fact that it has a skinny torso with each side torso very close to the even skinner CT. This makes it a lot easier to spread damage around.
#22
Posted 18 December 2012 - 09:49 AM
Green Mamba, on 18 December 2012 - 09:29 AM, said:
But it does. If it stops while at high speed the hitbox is still somewhere ahead of the mech.
You'll also often notice that they teleport a few meters to catch up their actual position as the power up and start moving again.
I use my raven 3L precisely because it is often the most survivable mech in the game. It's the only reason I bought it. And its the reason why I moth balled my jenners.
#23
Posted 18 December 2012 - 10:11 AM
Mechwarrior Buddah, on 18 December 2012 - 08:48 AM, said:
Its exploiting the lag shield in the netcode. Completely allowed exploiting. So run a Raven and exploit it yourself.
IMO this is something the [redacted] do well. They see an exploit and mass abuse it to prove the point that its broken. They should get on 8 manning all ECM Raven teams to show that off
I eagerly await the video of a flock of Lowtax ECM Ravens vs. Paul.
#24
Posted 18 December 2012 - 11:02 AM
- ECM, this makes the raven immune to SSRM2 and LRM, before the last patch, Streak-Cats were the bane of all light mechs, able to end them with a single volley. Now with ECM, the Raven must be killed by conventional weapons, which highlights the other issues.
- Water, this doesn’t apply on all maps, but water reduces and/or eliminates damage to the submerged locations, on an atlas that’s your feet, on a small mech it can be half or more of your hitbox locations.
- Lag shield. This is something we are all familiar with, shooting at a fast moving light mech but failing to connect. This can be compensated for by aiming 5 to 15 meters ahead of your target. It is an issue with all fast mechs, but much more noticeable on the Raven due to issue #4.
- Hit Box. The Raven has a unique and “buggy” hitbox layout, one that has too much negative space. This is why they will occasionally take no damage, even when standing still or shut down. If you fail to directly connect with the Raven’s minuscule hitbox locations they will take little or no damage; big bore ballistics like the AC20, can achieve a partial hit for some damage, while a smaller Gauss round will pass harmlessly though. Even worse, all appear to be direct hits client side, but server-side they do no damage.
#25
Posted 18 December 2012 - 11:11 AM
Rashhaverak, on 18 December 2012 - 09:21 AM, said:
Until then, we will just have to suffer the occasional D-bag team that tries to exploit the holes in the current design. If you play with a good, well coordinated team you can still beat them, just bring lots of SRMs.
Collisions? When? Q3, 2013?
I agree with the OP on the level that something does seem to be weird with the Raven. Ive hit them with 3x SRM6s and barely done any damage. Or even a pair of LL and they just turn yellow. There are times when I hit with a single AC20 to their back armor and it should kill them, but only turns them orange. Add in netcode issues, and they are pretty evil. The only real counter is SSRMs and an ECM or two to get the upper hand.
Something is not quite right.
#26
Posted 18 December 2012 - 11:21 AM
Agent 0 Fortune, on 18 December 2012 - 11:02 AM, said:
Thanks for this ... I've been mostly unable to kill them and this explains why.
#27
Posted 18 December 2012 - 11:24 AM
I even had to chainfire the ssrm as my heat was getting into 90+% just from ssrm at one raven.
#28
Posted 18 December 2012 - 11:59 AM
Green Mamba, on 18 December 2012 - 08:55 AM, said:
God, I haven't had ping that good since September... and I live <100 miles from Vancouver.
Lucky if I have <110 these days...
#29
Posted 19 December 2012 - 05:26 AM
Agent 0 Fortune, on 18 December 2012 - 11:02 AM, said:
I am SO sick of this nonsense: Anyone getting one-shotted by a streakcat just SUCKS at building a mech because they stripped armor off of critical areas.
A max streakcat had 6xSSRM2, doing 30 points of damage spread across at least your entire torso, as well as your less important arm (assuming you have ever played the game before and turn your torso as the missiles come in).
My COMMANDO has over 100 armor just on the front torso and arms, so the lightest mech in the game should take 3-4 volleys to kill.
Jenners and Ravens often took 6-7 volleys to kill. If they died, it was because they let themselves get outnumbered, or were overconfident in the lagshield and so didn't withdraw when they ran into the one mech in the game that could kill them before they killed it.
Since then, my A1 got changed to 6xSRM6 + Artemis. If the netGods are being kind, that mech puts 90 points of damage in 1 or 2 hitboxes. It is MUCH more powerful, MUCH better at killing mediums and up, but just crazy hard to hit a light.
#30
Posted 19 December 2012 - 06:34 AM
Agent 0 Fortune, on 18 December 2012 - 11:02 AM, said:
- ECM, this makes the raven immune to SSRM2 and LRM, before the last patch, Streak-Cats were the bane of all light mechs, able to end them with a single volley. Now with ECM, the Raven must be killed by conventional weapons, which highlights the other issues.
- Water, this doesn’t apply on all maps, but water reduces and/or eliminates damage to the submerged locations, on an atlas that’s your feet, on a small mech it can be half or more of your hitbox locations.
- Lag shield. This is something we are all familiar with, shooting at a fast moving light mech but failing to connect. This can be compensated for by aiming 5 to 15 meters ahead of your target. It is an issue with all fast mechs, but much more noticeable on the Raven due to issue #4.
- Hit Box. The Raven has a unique and “buggy” hitbox layout, one that has too much negative space. This is why they will occasionally take no damage, even when standing still or shut down. If you fail to directly connect with the Raven’s minuscule hitbox locations they will take little or no damage; big bore ballistics like the AC20, can achieve a partial hit for some damage, while a smaller Gauss round will pass harmlessly though. Even worse, all appear to be direct hits client side, but server-side they do no damage.
Wrong. None of these compare to Knock downs being removed. if you put knowck downs back in, the 4-man raven killer squad is dead. Ravens can run around heavies hunting lights with no worry because fo no knock down.
#31
Posted 19 December 2012 - 07:09 AM
It may change over time when more and more improvements be implemented into the game.
#32
Posted 19 December 2012 - 07:15 AM
An Phrakt was standing about 20 Meters before me and fired all what he had to offer at me, and i coudnt believe it, he missed nearly all shots ( from 20 Meters standing still to an powered down Mech)
Damm i loled like hell. but generaly its realy an issiu.
#33
Posted 19 December 2012 - 07:59 AM
It's just flat out ridiculous at the moment to be honest.
#34
Posted 19 December 2012 - 08:18 AM
#35
Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:00 AM
Now ballistics, laser etc? Good luck on a raven at 150 kph.
#36
Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:03 AM
#37
Posted 19 December 2012 - 09:04 AM
#38
Posted 20 December 2012 - 12:59 AM
Agent 0 fortune summed this up very well.
The other big problem is that the lag shield is very pronounced even on slow moving mechs:
- Try to hit a mech with an alpha strike, when he is full stopped, or an afk: it will do full alpha strike damage.
- Now try to hit a mech that moves, even very slowly, or move a bit yourself. Even if you focus your target precisely during the whole shot, the ennemy mech will take 1/3 damages, at best!
Another problem is that they put the ECM on the streak capable mechs, making them all mighty. And now the jenner kinda lose it's jetpack, making him kind of useless in comparaison with a raven.That's really a huge design flaw in my opinion :/
I really love this game, but thoses balances issues really break the game, making some mechs become really useless
#39
Posted 20 December 2012 - 08:07 AM
#40
Posted 20 December 2012 - 08:08 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users























