Jump to content

Idea For Lock On Balancing


1 reply to this topic

#1 Sinjen Liao

    Rookie

  • 4 posts

Posted 22 December 2012 - 10:19 AM

How about this. Every time you fire a lock-on weapon, you lose the lock and have to reacquire. There may need to be further balancing done. However, this would stop someone from just circling you and holding down the fire button. At least in this way they have to keep their targeting on you to reacquire every time. It would also make things like TAG, Narc and BAP even more important. If this was implemented there might need to be adjustments to all these things. Narc and Tag might enable you to maintain the lock if they are active on the target. BAP would of course speed your reacquiring the target.

Lets discuss both SSRM and LRM implementation pros and cons.

Edited by Sinjen Liao, 22 December 2012 - 03:26 PM.


#2 GrimReality

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 98 posts
  • LocationTX

Posted 22 December 2012 - 10:36 AM

View PostSinjen Liao, on 22 December 2012 - 10:19 AM, said:

Every time U fire a lock-on weapon, U lose the lock and have to reacquire.


I wholeheartedly support this idea.

And if this post is right: http://mwomercs.com/...-some-tweaking/
then it should be well in line with the TT rules.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users