Aurien Titus, on 23 December 2012 - 12:00 PM, said:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/b3ae9/b3ae9cf8cfed3e06df6984fcf2a08c460eab065d" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab344/ab3443a8c9ef85ee8e8bf74e6c998b49ea436b0b" alt=""
3050 - Time To Speculate About The Clans
#41
Posted 23 December 2012 - 11:12 PM
#42
Posted 23 December 2012 - 11:16 PM
Expensive repair fee can balance it out.
#43
Posted 23 December 2012 - 11:21 PM
El Bandito, on 23 December 2012 - 11:16 PM, said:
Expensive repair fee can balance it out.
#44
Posted 23 December 2012 - 11:36 PM
Yoseful Mallad, on 23 December 2012 - 11:21 PM, said:
Too bad we can mix and match weapons as is given the hardpoint system. Your point seems wasted given the current system.
#45
Posted 23 December 2012 - 11:41 PM
#46
Posted 23 December 2012 - 11:45 PM
#47
Posted 23 December 2012 - 11:58 PM
Clan tech in clan mechs only, IS tech in IS mechs only.
Clan mechs take 2 mech slots in game.
So 1 clan mech & 6 IS mechs VS 8 IS mechs.
3 clan mech & 2 IS mechs VS 8 IS mechs.
Clan mechs are about twice as good; much more maneuverable, much higher fire power. Only thing they don't have is double armor (but they can frequently max armor on any given chassis).
It creates an interesting scenario; do you want better concentration of power in a mech, or would you prefer more angles of attack and redundancy?
Other than a battle value system, everything else is too forced, artificial and community breaking. Maybe the only other thing you need to do is have players 'earn' the right to clan tech/clan mechs. Although I'm not entirely sure how one would accomplish this.
#50
Posted 24 December 2012 - 12:11 AM
It just seems Innerspehere mechs can take more punishment than clan mechs. Then the clan mechs can hold more firepower but cant take to many hits.
#51
Posted 24 December 2012 - 12:13 AM
Your 'old' IS mechs will have a place. I would imagine it would depend on what planet your on. Do you have a secure supply chain. Can you get parts to your Clan mech? Heck maybe you have gone through a rough battle and all you have parts for are your Atlas and your Jenners.
I am waiting to see how they do community warfare.
#53
Posted 24 December 2012 - 02:48 AM
Merky Merc, on 24 December 2012 - 12:15 AM, said:
And then you have an Atlas dressed to the nines in clan weaponry. Or 4v8? Lol Idc what mechs you have they're not Iwin buttons.
Or you simply not mix clan and IS tech. Simple right? You're really just trying to make this more difficult than it needs to be.
#54
Posted 24 December 2012 - 03:02 AM
Zaptruder, on 24 December 2012 - 12:06 AM, said:
2 IS mechs vs 1 Clan mech.
Is pretty simple.
Lets put this another way. 2 players in light mechs vs 1 player in an assault, who wins? I would say the 2 light mechs have the advantage. 2 brains vs 1 brain. So then what if they are 2 IS players in light mechs, and 1 Claner in an assault? How powerful would the clan mech have to be in order to take the 2v1 advantage then? And if they were that powerful, who in their right mind would pilot sub-par IS mechs?
The uneven teams thing works on paper, with dice and RNG, but in an FPS game it's just not a sustainable balancing factor.
#55
Posted 24 December 2012 - 03:08 AM
#56
Posted 24 December 2012 - 03:31 AM
Ozric, on 24 December 2012 - 03:02 AM, said:
Lets put this another way. 2 players in light mechs vs 1 player in an assault, who wins? I would say the 2 light mechs have the advantage. 2 brains vs 1 brain. So then what if they are 2 IS players in light mechs, and 1 Claner in an assault? How powerful would the clan mech have to be in order to take the 2v1 advantage then? And if they were that powerful, who in their right mind would pilot sub-par IS mechs?
The uneven teams thing works on paper, with dice and RNG, but in an FPS game it's just not a sustainable balancing factor.
As far as pugs go, the match making system attempts to account for weight classes when putting teams together. Keep that as a factor in balancing.
Without uneven teams, the only other options are
1. Ignore clan/IS tech imbalance - result is IS tech becomes redundant, and pay to win dichotomy is exacerbated (i.e. it takes much longer to earn a viable mech without paying for it).
2. Nerf clan tech - Going against the grain of the fiction and TT rules, ******* off a large portion of their fan and playerbase, marginalizing the unique and interesting imbalance inherent to the BTech property.
3. Economic/XP penalties for playing clan mechs - creates another pay to win problem; where unless you're running premium accounts, it's not feasible to play clans mechs AND OR devalues clan mechs to the point where they're not practically viable, except for end game players (players that have so much money that they don't care about Cbill costs).
The uneven (number of players on each) teams system can be calibrated after some playtesting. 2 for 1 is a pretty easy way to start, and if necessary, they can fine tune it with an update battle value system and some more intelligent match making software. It also does its best to preserve the unique flavour and rules of the universe and TT game.
#57
Posted 24 December 2012 - 04:24 AM
Bad Clan Team vs Bad IS Team = Clan Team Likely to win due to technology advantage
Mediocre Clan Team vs Mediocre IS Team = IS team wins by numbers.
Good Clan Team vs Good IS Team = IS team wins by numbers
What needs to happen is that each weapon tech tree has its niche's.
Lets take MW4 as an example,
ERL = ISLL - In a number of cases the ISLL was better because it ran much cooler and could be used as a pressure mechanic making ERL based teams overheat.
Light Gauss Rifle - Great extended range weapon, that gave some good IS units a great advantage over clan teams because of its range (hint we need long range maps to support this)
Heavy Gauss Rifle - Absolute killer medium - short range.
Sadly these are all time scale dependant aspects, but that's part of the universe, eventually the IS starts to catch up.
#58
Posted 24 December 2012 - 05:07 AM
DV McKenna, on 24 December 2012 - 04:24 AM, said:
Bad Clan Team vs Bad IS Team = Clan Team Likely to win due to technology advantage
Mediocre Clan Team vs Mediocre IS Team = IS team wins by numbers.
Good Clan Team vs Good IS Team = IS team wins by numbers
Your assertions are backed up by nothing.
#59
Posted 24 December 2012 - 06:19 AM
Can you imagine two brawling stalkers taking on a single daishi? 8 SRM's 6's rip it aparty while it struggles with heat management.
To balance it you need to have a system that takes in to account they are better than the IS equipment but not so much better to be able to take on multiple mechs in MWO. They are going to run into the same issues that people post on now. Their streaks / LRM's don't work against ECM, twin ac20 or gauss mechs hitting the same location, light mechs can be difficult to hit at times, a lot of them will come with xl engines at standard.
#60
Posted 24 December 2012 - 06:21 AM
Thorn Hallis, on 23 December 2012 - 12:16 PM, said:
LOL your joking right... omni mechs by definition are fully customisable and rank has nothing to do with it!
Quaff?
However clanners fight differently to IS. So lets talk zellbrigen... clanner can only fight a single mech at a time, unless they are fired upon by another enemy... accordingly there should be the ability to focus fire that a lot of players currently use. So how to instigate this well once a clan mech locks a target and hits it the first time they cannot swap targets (unless attacked and then they can swap between their first target and the enemy who attacked them) other clan mechs cannot lock on to a target already locked by a clan mech unless it has attacked another clan mech. Clan players lose exp and c-bills at the same rate as a tk if they engage ootside of zillbrigen.
10 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 10 guests, 0 anonymous users