4
Mwo - Demanding Or Poorly Optimized?
Started by WolvesX, Dec 27 2012 11:03 AM
13 replies to this topic
#1
Posted 27 December 2012 - 11:03 AM
Hello fellow Mechwarriors?
I can play BF3 on all ultra with 60 FPS all the time (because I capped it on 60).
In MWO, I got (If I max everything out) min 21 FPS.
So. Should I get better hardware or is this game just poorly optimized?
Greetings and thanks
WolvesX
I can play BF3 on all ultra with 60 FPS all the time (because I capped it on 60).
In MWO, I got (If I max everything out) min 21 FPS.
So. Should I get better hardware or is this game just poorly optimized?
Greetings and thanks
WolvesX
#2
Posted 27 December 2012 - 11:05 AM
Perhaps you should add a 'yes' option?
Just a thought.
Just a thought.
#3
Posted 27 December 2012 - 11:05 AM
The Devs are constantly making improvements to the game which should result in gradual performance increases as time goes on. They've stated that they are currently testing different CPUs so that the game is not as dependent on quad core setups. This should result in large gains for dual core users, who are experiencing the most problems at the moment.
#6
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:04 AM
I thing its your Hardware, i run the Game on a quadcore ( I7 920 ) and a very old Radeon 4870 with 50 Fps in medium details
#7
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:06 AM
Of cos its poorly optimized... hell, its not even near optimized, they hadnt even gotten the engine update nor even DX11 sorted out... be patient, its beta.
BF3 only got a FPS boost in the latest update when they really optimized and finalized the codes. Before that I used to get only about 40FPS with BF3 as well.
BF3 only got a FPS boost in the latest update when they really optimized and finalized the codes. Before that I used to get only about 40FPS with BF3 as well.
Edited by Pr8Dator, 28 December 2012 - 08:07 AM.
#8
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:08 AM
oh! oh! theres a word for this....
um.... its on the tip of my tongue...
ope, ot dere
um.... its on the tip of my tongue...
ope, ot dere
#9
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:15 AM
I got a Q9550 ATI HD6850 8 GB RAM and the game installed on a RAID 0 HD system. IF its the HW, this is not going to be cheap.
#10
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:26 AM
It's probably a little bit of both. It's is on the Cryengine after all. That said, they do have work to do optimizing it.
#11
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:37 AM
The Dev's admit the game is terribly unoptimized at this point.
#12
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:42 AM
Protip: many are reporting better framerate on medium settings than the lowest.
#14
Posted 28 December 2012 - 08:58 AM
hardware is not the problem. its just the programming, it needs to be fixed.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users