Jump to content

Survey: Tonnage Limit In 8V8 Matches? If So, How High?

Started by Larec, Jan 18 2013 12:24 AM

21 replies to this topic

Poll: Survey: Tonnage limit in 8v8 matches? If so, how high? (60 member(s) have cast votes)

Would you like to see a tonnage limit in 8v8 matches?

  1. Yes (32 votes [53.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 53.33%

  2. No (7 votes [11.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.67%

  3. Should be optional (19 votes [31.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.67%

  4. There should be other limits (BV, Chassis, etc) (2 votes [3.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.33%

If yes, how high should this limit be?

  1. < 350 tons (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  2. 350 - 370 tons (1 votes [1.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.67%

  3. 371 - 390 tons (1 votes [1.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.67%

  4. 391 - 410 tons (5 votes [8.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

  5. 411 - 430 tons (1 votes [1.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 1.67%

  6. 431 - 450 tons (7 votes [11.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.67%

  7. 451 - 470 tons (6 votes [10.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  8. 471 - 490 tons (5 votes [8.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

  9. 491 - 510 tons (15 votes [25.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 25.00%

  10. 511 - 530 tons (5 votes [8.33%])

    Percentage of vote: 8.33%

  11. > 530 tons (0 votes [0.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 0.00%

  12. No limit at all! (6 votes [10.00%])

    Percentage of vote: 10.00%

  13. Flexible limit set by agreement (4 votes [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

  14. There should be other limits (BV, Chassis, etc) (4 votes [6.67%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.67%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#21 Regrets

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 382 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:39 AM

I guess I just feel like in Conquest encourages balanced play and Assault encourages getting 8 ECM Atlas in a ball of death. If they want to encourage balanced game play, there are ways to do it other than forcing weight limits on teams.

#22 ElliottHD

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 86 posts
  • LocationPhiladelphia, PA

Posted 23 January 2013 - 06:57 AM

It looks like they have reconsidered thier previous stance on a lobby, since they mention that they are currently looking into one in the Ask The Devs 30 answers. I find that extremely interesting considering that they have stated that they were not going to go to a lobby system in the past. And that they had done some internal testing of a lobby system, and that it wasn't an option that they would be revisiting. I just hope it works if and when the release it.
Back to Archive · Next Unread Topic →


1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users