Jump to content

Stalker 3F Vs C1 Cat


6 replies to this topic

#1 Truthstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 221 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:54 PM

Here's an example of poor DHS coding.

Stalker and C1 both same loadout:
1 ER PPC
1 PPC
1LgPulse

Stalker heat eff: 1.37
Cat 1.34

Dumb.

#2 Kaspirikay

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Giant Helper
  • 2,050 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:10 PM

Posted Image
okay man

#3 One Medic Army

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,985 posts
  • LocationBay Area, California

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:17 PM

And are they both using the same engine and number of heatsinks?
Do they both carry 10 or more heatsinks internal to the engine?

#4 Thorqemada

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 6,402 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:21 PM

Different engines?
Different engine DHS?
Engine DHS count 2.0 while extra DHS count 1.4 atm.
Extra DHS in engine HS slots count 1.4 afaik (you can put either HS or DHS into free engine HS slots).

Edited by Thorqemada, 21 January 2013 - 06:27 PM.


#5 Truthstar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 221 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 08:46 PM

View PostOne Medic Army, on 21 January 2013 - 06:17 PM, said:

And are they both using the same engine and number of heatsinks?
Do they both carry 10 or more heatsinks internal to the engine?



Stalker has 23 DHS and Cat 22.

#6 One Medic Army

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,985 posts
  • LocationBay Area, California

Posted 21 January 2013 - 09:28 PM

View PostTruthstar, on 21 January 2013 - 08:46 PM, said:

Stalker has 23 DHS and Cat 22.

So why is it odd the Stalker has better heat efficiency?

#7 ARCTICF0X

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 75 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 09:49 PM

Fail thread, please close.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users