Jump to content

Hbk And Artemis


39 replies to this topic

#1 Kaarde

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 398 posts
  • LocationState of confusion

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:19 AM

Hey folks,

I just got back from an extended stint over seas. The game was still in Closed Beta when I left.

Now that I'm back and picking up the game again I have a question. My go to mech was a Hunchback sporting two srm racks in its torso. I plan on grabbing another but was wondering if it's worth sacrificing a bit of weight to grab an Artemis.

Ive read that they spread out the srm pattern and wanted to know if the module would help counteract that.

#2 GODzillaGSPB

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,031 posts
  • LocationGermany

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:24 AM

Yes, it would. I use Artemis for my Hunchback 4SP. ;)

#3 Lyrik

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 568 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:26 AM

For me, the tradeoff in ammo consumption, heat and weight wasn't worth it.

#4 The Amazing Atomic Spaniel

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 932 posts
  • LocationBath, UK

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:28 AM

It tightens up the missile spread against targets that don't have ECM. I prefer the slight edge it gives as a trade-off vs weight, but there's no definite yes or no answer.

#5 Lucky Noob

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ankle Biter
  • The Ankle Biter
  • 1,149 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:30 AM

HBK 4-P

1PPC
2 Medium Pulse Laser
6 Medium Laser.

No need for anything else ;)

#6 Kaarde

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 398 posts
  • LocationState of confusion

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:32 AM

I was thinking going

Paired srm4's with 2 tons ammo
Med lasers in the arms
Ams
Artemis

Is it worth the trouble of double Heat Sink or Ferrofiberous or Endo-Steel on the Hunch?
I kept up with the forums a bit whilst stuck in Russia, but my Internet was spotty and I missed a lot of info on these.

Thanks

#7 Lucky Noob

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Ankle Biter
  • The Ankle Biter
  • 1,149 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:34 AM

Il go with endo and double and i love it.

So much weight free to put nice shiny Guns in it and fast engines ;)

#8 Fusea

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 82 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:42 AM

Now that the horrifying cost to reload artemis equipped missiles is gone, it's mostly a question of opprotunity cost. What could you do with the 2 free tons? More ammo? More heatsinks? More guns? More Speed? Personally, I tried artemis, and never really noticed much of a difference. So for me it was more heatsinks or ammo.

Just remember, you have to pay to buy it, and weirdly, pay again to rip it out. So keep that in mind.

#9 King Arthur IV

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • 2,549 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:46 AM

no it is not.
if you can some how find an additional 4tons, maybe. 2 for artimus and 1 extra for each srm.


im running:
-std245
-4 medium
-1 medium pulse
-2 srm4
-2 tons of ammo
17 DHS
endo-steal
336/338 armor

im maxed out in tons and slots. on top of not being able to fit it, the grouping is not fantastic. if your in a hunchback, surely you can get close enough to use them.

#10 Apoc1138

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,708 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 21 January 2013 - 05:57 AM

View PostKing Arthur IV, on 21 January 2013 - 05:46 AM, said:

no it is not.
if you can some how find an additional 4tons, maybe. 2 for artimus and 1 extra for each srm.


im running:
-std245
-4 medium
-1 medium pulse
-2 srm4
-2 tons of ammo
17 DHS
endo-steal
336/338 armor

im maxed out in tons and slots. on top of not being able to fit it, the grouping is not fantastic. if your in a hunchback, surely you can get close enough to use them.


by the same argument, you could swap all your medium lasers to smalls and be alot more heat efficient which would also allow you to run a slightly bigger engine (which would also give you +1 double heatsink) and you also get the benefit of the 0.75s beam duration and only a loss of 1 DPS out of 6.6 to 5.6

#11 M4L4R3K

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 55 posts
  • LocationCanada

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:03 AM

I think it is worth it ;)

Running:
-XL 260 engine (I don't mind trading vulnerability for extra speed and weight,full throttle with speed tweak = 92kph)
-STD armor
-4 med lasers
-2 srm6 + Artemis (3 tons of ammo)
-336/338 armor
-15 DHS

Edited by M4L4R3K, 21 January 2013 - 06:29 AM.


#12 Havyek

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary Rank 3
  • 1,349 posts
  • LocationBarrie, ON

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:28 AM

HBK-4SP

I just threw this together but it's a Standard 250, 4 MLAS, 2 SRM6s (no Artemis), 4 tons of ammo, AMS and 13 DHS.

Edited by BDU Havoc, 21 January 2013 - 06:28 AM.


#13 King Arthur IV

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • 2,549 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:36 AM

View PostApoc1138, on 21 January 2013 - 05:57 AM, said:


by the same argument, you could swap all your medium lasers to smalls and be alot more heat efficient which would also allow you to run a slightly bigger engine (which would also give you +1 double heatsink) and you also get the benefit of the 0.75s beam duration and only a loss of 1 DPS out of 6.6 to 5.6

it really comes down to player preference. your build would be faster more heat efficient (what isnt efficient with small lasers) the build im running is at 1.3 HE, that is a very manageable HE. your alpha is 10 damage less and you lose over 300m range. i can technically shoot you twice before you get in range to shoot once. it really is about player preference but this is off topic.

artimus is not worth the weight imo. imo you are wasting weight and slots on a upgrade that can deplete. 2 tons of ammo is enough ammo on the 4sp but its not alot.

#14 Carrioncrows

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 2,949 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:44 AM

The only hunchback design you "Don"t want to go ENDO with is the Hunchback-4P, and that's only because you need the space for all the Double Heat sinks you can fit.

As for the HGB-4SP, I run DHS, Endo, 5 Medium lasers and x2 SSRM6+ Artemis

#15 King Arthur IV

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • 2,549 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:47 AM

View PostCarrioncrows, on 21 January 2013 - 06:44 AM, said:

The only hunchback design you "Don"t want to go ENDO with is the Hunchback-4P, and that's only because you need the space for all the Double Heat sinks you can fit.

As for the HGB-4SP, I run DHS, Endo, 5 Medium lasers and x2 SSRM6+ Artemis

ssrm6 ;) ill pay anything for those.

#16 Apoc1138

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,708 posts
  • LocationUK

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:47 AM

View PostKing Arthur IV, on 21 January 2013 - 06:36 AM, said:

it really comes down to player preference.


you asked how you could save weight on your build, that's all I responded to, whatever your reasoning is is fine

I actually run a similar build to you, but not medium pulse, just the 4 mediums and extra heatsinks

#17 MustrumRidcully

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,644 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:48 AM

I think ARtemis does good, but I am not sure it's needed. IF you have some spare money to switch back & forth, try it out.

#18 King Arthur IV

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Moderate Giver
  • 2,549 posts

Posted 21 January 2013 - 06:52 AM

View PostApoc1138, on 21 January 2013 - 06:47 AM, said:


you asked how you could save weight on your build, that's all I responded to, whatever your reasoning is is fine

I actually run a similar build to you, but not medium pulse, just the 4 mediums and extra heatsinks

i should of made it more clear, i just dont like artimus. if op wants to try artimus out, he can give the build you suggested and the others a whirl.

#19 Taizan

    Com Guard

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,692 posts
  • LocationGalatea (NRW)

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:07 AM

Moved this topic to the Battlemechs sub forum, where it is more appropriate.

#20 Ithereal

    Rookie

  • 5 posts
  • LocationRochester, MN

Posted 21 January 2013 - 07:37 AM

View PostRocketDog, on 21 January 2013 - 05:28 AM, said:

It tightens up the missile spread against targets that don't have ECM. I prefer the slight edge it gives as a trade-off vs weight, but there's no definite yes or no answer.


Does anyone know the convergence ranges for SRM4/6 w/Artemis? I think they converge 3 times correct?





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users