94 replies to this topic

[MustrumRidcully]

Apoc1138, on 22 January 2013 - 07:42 AM, said:

it is a pretty good one... the last post on this subject was in the command section in early December - it says that PPC's will be getting a heat buff and that it will happen by mid January, and that in any case we will be updated in the meantime

it is now late January and we've heard not a dickie bird in the command section... but someone pops on reddit and says "how about an update on heat buff for PPC" and bang, instant update

that's not really how it should be

I have to agree. Barring some "exclusive info" for magazines and websites they partner up with, I would hope that most information would find its way to this website or the forums. That's what they are for.

[Apoc1138]

also, the 6PPC stalker being the reason why we don't get a PPC buff is seriously ghê

Edited by Apoc1138, 22 January 2013 - 07:50 AM.

[Mackman]

OneManWar, on 22 January 2013 - 07:39 AM, said:

Yes, because putting an image of ONE post he made 5 days ago is a great example of THIS situation. Also, maybe he prefers posting there because not all of them are entitled little children nit picking about stupid bullsh!t like this.

Cheers mate!

Dude, we're not asking them to grab some parchment and ink, write an elaborate letter in the finest calligraphy, put it in an envelope, seal it with wax, track down a postman, and pay him to bring us the letter over frozen tundras and boiling deserts, through many perils over a month-long journey.

We want one person from PGI to move their mouse over to the "Forums" tab in their browser, open up a "New Post," and spend 30 seconds explaining to us why they can't be bothered to keep their own deadlines or even keep us updated when they miss them.

I really, really don't think that's too much to ask.

[Tennex]

once again folks. work ethics

[Pando]

There might be clarification coming soon. You're welcome. Thank miSs

Edited by Pando, 22 January 2013 - 08:05 AM.

[Crunk Prime]

6xPPC stalker woulnt even be an issue if the game had a proper hardpoint system implemented.

[Nicholas Carlyle]

Pretty disapointed by the lack of response. This is really what I worried about happening, and is a large reason this game may not succeed.

[Mackman]

Pando, on 22 January 2013 - 08:05 AM, said:

There might be clarification coming soon. You're welcome. Thank miSs

Source? I'd be very happy if this was true...

[XWorldEaterX]

Still nothing? I tried staying up last night since this will be the first time reading these but ended up falling asleep. Where do they usually post the answers?

[Hythos]

Crunk Prime, on 22 January 2013 - 08:08 AM, said:

6xPPC stalker woulnt even be an issue if the game had a proper hardpoint system implemented.

I'd rather have a 10xMedium LASER + 20xSmall LASER Atlas with an Axe and Tripple Strength Myomer under a 400XL.
While I'm against a hardpoint system, MWO is fair because everyone has access to the same equipment. What's a better arguement is the heat mechanism and no penalty for excessive heat (Pilot Damage) save that of enabling Overburn.

[XWorldEaterX]

Hythos, on 22 January 2013 - 08:52 AM, said:

I'd rather have a 10xMedium LASER + 20xSmall LASER Atlas with an Axe and Tripple Strength Myomer under a 400XL.
While I'm against a hardpoint system, MWO is fair because everyone has access to the same equipment. What's a better arguement is the heat mechanism and no penalty for excessive heat (Pilot Damage) save that of enabling Overburn.

lol how hard is it to blow up your own mech? I have seen quite a few atlas pilots do this and would think it is a bigger problem with a 6ppc stalker.

[Mackman]

Hythos, on 22 January 2013 - 08:52 AM, said:

I'd rather have a 10xMedium LASER + 20xSmall LASER Atlas with an Axe and Tripple Strength Myomer under a 400XL.
While I'm against a hardpoint system, MWO is fair because everyone has access to the same equipment. What's a better arguement is the heat mechanism and no penalty for excessive heat (Pilot Damage) save that of enabling Overburn.

Can we keep this on-topic please? We don't need the thread being closed for degenerating into a random "ppc/heat/whatever" thread.

[XWorldEaterX]

Mackman, on 22 January 2013 - 08:54 AM, said:

Can we keep this on-topic please? We don't need the thread being closed for degenerating into a random "ppc/heat/whatever" thread.

Aren't we just waiting? Not much else we can do but chat with eachother or rage at the devs....

[Pando]

Mackman, on 22 January 2013 - 08:45 AM, said:

Source? I'd be very happy if this was true...

miSs, on 22 January 2013 - 07:55 AM, said:

Hello Pando,

Answers will be posted next Monday before the end of the day! = Jan 21st

Thanks for bringing this to my attention. I will check with PGI was it going on with this and get back to you.


Regards,
miSs
Community Rep.

Thanks miSs!

Edited by Pando, 22 January 2013 - 09:09 AM.

[Mackman]

That's comforting, at least. Thanks, MiSs, and thanks for letting us know, dude!