

Who Runs A Q6600?
#1
Posted 01 February 2013 - 10:48 AM
I was considering all new system soon, but I already have a somewhat acceptable experience with the e5200 and a radeon 6850. Win 7, 4 gig ram.
I see q6600 on ebay for 65 usd and am thinking maybe just swap out the cpu and see.
Anyone still running the q6600? and how does it handle the game.
btw. I run at mostly med/low. average Id say 35 fps.
After performance tweek 6 weeks ago, game runs kinda fine.
thanks.
#2
Posted 01 February 2013 - 11:47 AM
Certainly not to be sniffed at for only 65 bucks.
#3
Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:03 PM
Edited by MavRCK, 01 February 2013 - 12:04 PM.
#4
Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:15 PM
MavRCK, on 01 February 2013 - 12:03 PM, said:
Sleipnir, on 01 February 2013 - 11:47 AM, said:
I agree
#5
Posted 01 February 2013 - 12:35 PM
Edited by Jackarl2, 01 February 2013 - 12:36 PM.
#6
Posted 01 February 2013 - 07:21 PM
#7
Posted 03 February 2013 - 11:50 AM

#8
Posted 03 February 2013 - 12:00 PM

#9
Posted 03 February 2013 - 02:15 PM
#10
Posted 03 February 2013 - 02:20 PM
#11
Posted 03 February 2013 - 03:36 PM
we will see.. At least the swap out is easy.
#12
Posted 03 February 2013 - 07:58 PM
mekabuser, on 03 February 2013 - 03:36 PM, said:
we will see.. At least the swap out is easy.
That would only be true in single and dual threaded programs. Programs that would use all 4 cores of the Q6600 would run faster on the Q6600(cough MW:O cough)
#13
Posted 04 February 2013 - 07:50 AM
Edited by Juicebox12, 04 February 2013 - 07:51 AM.
#14
Posted 04 February 2013 - 11:33 AM
With a higher voltage i could go higher, but the MoBo doesn't support this

I got it for 44€ on ebay 2 months ago.
Occasional stuttering, but it runs MWO much much better then the old Dual Pentium E6300@3.4Ghz ! (i will post benchmarks later)
The E6300 have a better single core performance (~twice as much) but the Cryengine does run better on a Quad Core, thats a fact.
The q6600 is a cheap and fast way to upgrade your old rig. For MWO you NEED a 4 core CPU!
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users