

Judge My 4Sp?
#1
Posted 07 February 2013 - 05:04 AM
XL 240
15 DHS
Endo-Steel
2x ERPPC
1x LRM10, 1 LRM ammo.
This might make some of you cringe, I don't know. I personally love this build, as it is a great support mech in battle. Doesn't generate too much heat, I was able to fire off about 4 dual PPC shots in the volcano of CV before overheating.
Good for landing killshots, helping friendlies. Not a big brawler, though.
#2
Posted 07 February 2013 - 05:08 AM
But the most important thing is that you like it!
So dont give a **** what other players say

#3
Posted 07 February 2013 - 05:13 AM
I suggest to swap out the LRM10 with 2x LRM5 to save a ton ton of weight to put in aTAG or another ton of ammo. You get some redundancy too.
Edited by Bagua, 07 February 2013 - 05:19 AM.
#4
Posted 07 February 2013 - 05:14 AM
edit: ninja'ed
Edited by Flapdrol, 07 February 2013 - 05:14 AM.
#5
Posted 07 February 2013 - 05:33 AM
If you go for a XL 240 and not for a 250, you might as well go for an XL 225. Same # of heatsinks (9), still go 80 kph with speed tweak but you have more tonnage free.
Instead of 1 LRM10, throw in 2 LRM 5, agreed.
Throw in a TAG, you need it for LRMing targets with ECM, sometimes it can be hard to find targets without cover
Add Endosteel, take 2 Tons more LRM ammo
Something like this.
Personally I do not like PPCs in Arms, somehow the aiming with the circle reticule seems odd, but maybe that's just me.
Enjoy!

#7
Posted 07 February 2013 - 06:43 AM
I will take your word for the engine though, Taizan.
#8
Posted 07 February 2013 - 06:48 AM
anyway, remove a sink, run 2x lrm5 and an xl255, should have more heat dissipation and another half ton armor.
Edited by Flapdrol, 07 February 2013 - 08:48 AM.
#9
Posted 07 February 2013 - 08:47 AM
HBK-4SP - no missile build, which removes half the purpose of playing an SP
HBK-4SP non-XL engine build
#10
Posted 07 February 2013 - 09:40 AM
#11
Posted 07 February 2013 - 11:38 AM
#12
Posted 07 February 2013 - 12:01 PM
#13
Posted 07 February 2013 - 01:49 PM
I don't like the XL engine in the hunchie, I've lost a shoulder, and still gone on to kill a couple more mechs.
#14
Posted 07 February 2013 - 01:53 PM
#15
Posted 07 February 2013 - 04:23 PM
I would second the vote for dual LRM5's and the extra ton of ammo for this build.
I'm also not a fan of XL's in hunchbacks, but if you are, go for a 255Xl so you get 10 DHS' in the engine and near max speed in the hunchie.
Good Luck!
-S
#16
Posted 07 February 2013 - 11:42 PM
Mainly I relied on the speed of this build to stay on distance to give fire-support with PPCs and LRMs, when possible I tried to flank. Basicly I played it like a classic Dragon and the mech shined on the bigger maps.
The medium Lasers were helpfull to leg a Commando in an 1:1 and to finish off an Atlas with ripped off back armor.
The avarage damage has been around 300 points, I usually do more damage with the SRM variant of the 4SP.
Heat was manageable but two more heatsinks in favor for the Artemis would be better.
A real thread were other fast medium mechs and the XL engine is a guarantee to die quick in melees.
Well, it had been fun to play this mech but I prefer a Dragon for this role.
Edited by Bagua, 07 February 2013 - 11:45 PM.
#17
Posted 08 February 2013 - 03:34 AM
WTFClock, on 07 February 2013 - 05:04 AM, said:
XL 240
15 DHS
Endo-Steel
2x ERPPC
1x LRM10, 1 LRM ammo.
This might make some of you cringe, I don't know. I personally love this build, as it is a great support mech in battle. Doesn't generate too much heat, I was able to fire off about 4 dual PPC shots in the volcano of CV before overheating.
Good for landing killshots, helping friendlies. Not a big brawler, though.
Hell no its not a brawler. However, I would lose the lrm10 and ton (really 1 ton) of ammo and put another heavy laser or maybe streaks?
#18
Posted 08 February 2013 - 08:57 AM
Right now most of the builds are min/max style, so either go full brawling or a long range bomber/sniper are the two popular roles.
For a hunchie, Endo is a must, but XL engine depends on the build. I really like std engines for surivability since you don't have tons of side torso armor in any medium mech.
-S
Edited by Splinters, 08 February 2013 - 08:57 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users