8 replies to this topic

[Skadi]

As it sits the only 2 Hero Mechs that are realy "good" Are the Muromets and the Flame.

While all of the other hero mechs are fine in their own way, they realy dont appeal to many players because
1. they may want one just for fun, but realy why pay that much just for ***** n giggles
2. it takes up a mech slot of a potentialy realy good mech.

My suggestion to increase Hero Mech Incentives is to:
1. Upon purchase you recieve a extra mech bay slot just for that mech.
2. Upon purchase you get all of the colors on the mech for all mechs.
2. Upon purchase you get that mechs pattern for all of the other mechs of its type.

Edited by Skadi, 10 February 2013 - 04:38 PM.

[Rigiroth]

Eseentially my post. I support this.

[Volthorne]

Like those ideas EXCEPT FOR THE PATTERN. MUST NOT HAVE SHARABLE PATTERN.

[Eddrick]

(Raises cost of Hero Mech to account for cost of Mech Bay and colors/patterns)

This, too.

Volthorne, on 10 February 2013 - 07:08 PM, said:

Like those ideas EXCEPT FOR THE PATTERN. MUST NOT HAVE SHARABLE PATTERN.

[Skadi]

Eddrick, on 10 February 2013 - 07:14 PM, said:

(Raises cost of Hero Mech to account for cost of Mech Bay and colors/patterns)

This, too.

I can see where your coming from on the pattern, but PGI would be considered ******* if they upped hero mech prices.
These changes should be made with no additional cost attached.

[Eddrick]

Skadi, on 10 February 2013 - 10:10 PM, said:

I can see where your coming from on the pattern, but PGI would be considered ******* if they upped hero mech prices.
These changes should be made with no additional cost attached.

Maybe, they will just add the extras without cost. As a sale atleast.

I just wouldn't want to add extra without cost, unless it was a sale. Which, can make up the differance in cost.

[Yiazmat]

+1

[Karl Streiger]

hm...what about switching the missile slot of the Fang into his left torso?
Even canons supports this:
http://www.camospecs...ure.asp?ID=5899

[Mechteric]

I don't think the Pattern thing will pan out, but I'm on board with the other ideas