Jump to content

Mech Tierlist + Metagame Discussion


96 replies to this topic

#1 Captain Midnight

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 657 posts

Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:25 AM

EDIT: This thread was originally made in the days following the ECM patch. Some of the info is no longer accurate, some of it is. The ECM/LOWS (lock on weapons) dynamic remains horrible, and PPCs are about to be very overpowered next patch if they do truely cancel ECM. They made regular PPCs pretty high tier right now already, much less with an ECM effect. They will obsolete any other energy weapon on heavy/assault in competitive play I'm sure and probably farther down the line even. (Get ready for 4SPs to pack PPCs instead of MLs). 4SP might even wind up at an advantage over the Centurion A because ECM cancelling PPCs in the arms is almost definitely worth a single missile pack lost from the switch.

Anyways, if I wanted to write a whole new post I would, but because this is on the front page again I thought I'd just add that. This is an interesting slice of mechwarrior past for me because at the time I think that tierlist was SPOT ON. Now I can see some clear changes... Certain mechs have dropped behind the pack and the JJ change put the cataphract 3D up there with the A1 for "best heavies" probably with the K2 close in there as well. With how much better the netcode is, direct fire weapons are all super strong now and SRMs tend to hit so... Here is a short tierlist update with the best mechs in each weight category.

GOD TIER MECHS: Raven 3L (streaks still lol), Centurion A (SRMs), Hunchback 4SP (SRMs and medium lasers), Cicada 3M (My build is a secret but I copied blazing aces so ask them!), Cataphract 3D (Jumpsniper), Catapult A1/K2 (SRM/AC20/GAUSS alpha beast), Atlas DDC (long range, short range, who cares this mech is best assault hands down and will be until another one gets ECM)


Hello MWO community! I'm Captain Midnight, and I am a veteran player from founders wave 10 of closed beta (and a legendary founder). I've played nearly 2,500 games in open beta, own every variant of every mech, each and every one of which is elited. I have 50m C-Bills in the bank, DHS and XL engines for nearly every mech and every weapon configuration. All modules are unlocked and purchased, as well as 55k GXP in the bank.

My KDR is 4.17, and my W/L ratio is 6.7. I am what I would consider an elite mechwarrior, and I mention those stats not only to wag my epeen but so that hopefully people are like "damn, that guy has played an insane amount of mechwarrior, his opinions on balance probably hold at least some weight". I'm between work right now, it's winter holidays, I'm early 20s... I'm kicking back and spending a couple months hanging out with friends and playing mechwarrior when I'm just sitting around at home, which is a lot. I'm not some basement nerd and whatever you think try to stay on topic here and focus on the issues not the personalities.

This thread is basically a TL;DR about what I think of MWO in terms of balance, where I want MWO to go, and also a brief tierlist of weapons/Mechs so that new players and anyone looking for guidance can really get an idea of what is good and what isn't. Ideally people can use this as a resource and general primer on MWO meta and theory (at least from my perspective).

First off, I think missiles are kind OP. A generally true rule is that if you have both an ECM advantage and a streak advantage (particularly on light v light) you are at an INSANE advantage, because of how strong streaks are. For larger mechs with ECM it pretty much gets rid of LRM fire, but without ECM coverage LRMs are op. It's too binary and LRMs should be usable in more situations but be substantial less powerful, they should be backup weapons not boat-able primary weapons. Same with streaks, they need to be bad enough that stacking them isn't the best option. The best way to nerf them IMO is either straight damage, lots of heat, ammo per ton, or best possible option add some more skill to them. Also, something about the A1 is just broken. SSRM2s are ez mode on it, and now Artemis SRM6s are ez mode too. Missiles need a nerf for sure and it has to be something systemic so they aren't OP when boated or worthless when alone like what convergence and lag does for other weapons.

Second, lasers are at an advantage right now in a sense, but ballistics are better overall alpha weapons. A 3xGauss or 3xAC20 build would be insane, or 4xUAC, could you guys imagine? Right now I really favor lasers because you can boat 4xPPC on an Atlas RS /w 40 standard heat sinks and obliterate people with 40 points of alpha headshot firepower/limb burst, or a 5xLL Cataphract or a 9xML Hunchback; boats like that just aren't here for ballistics yet. Therefore I think ballistics and energy are perhaps totally fine, with the real problem being missiles, boating in general, and heat mechanics. Convergence ought to be less of a factor for beam/ballistics UNLESS it's going to become more of a factor for missiles. Boating in general is the real problem and something very clever is needed, it can't feel like you aren't allowed to boat, the game needs to make you not even want to boat in the first place...

Third, it's not too late to make these four maps be the only arena deathmatch style maps. The next maps can be big and this game will have a MUCH richer metagame for it if we get some big honkin' maps in this game. Many more strategies and much less of an arms race as speed and versatility become more important than strength rushing a route. The bigger the maps the easier the game will be to balance.

Fourth, ECM is ridiculous, but it needs to be balanced hand in hand with streaks and LRMs and I think some entirely new systems need to be developed, like after each shot you have to re-lock streaks, (and make streaks lock faster than LRMs/separately). Make it so they miss 100% of the time if lock is lost. I dunno, stuff like that, stuff that makes it harder for it to just hit automatically all the time with no effort involved. That level of power is why ECM is necessarily so powerful, it just shuts off the mechanism that streak/lrm uses. It's too binary and not interesting game play. Perhaps Artemis should require that the cursor remain inside the red r-square for the ENTIRE flight duration (maybe even need LOS), but as a reward increase the flight time dramatically. That makes Artemis more of a lateral upgrade instead of such an obviously direct one. As a result of it being less of a dramatic upgrade the price for ammo can come down as you'll no longer need an artificial reason to restrict it's use.

Fifth, 8-mans and matchmaking in general need some revisions. For the very least and most immediate change, we need the 8-mans to prefer weight based. I'm thinking 30 seconds of looking for even weights, then if you can't 30 more seconds looking for any other group that has already failed their first 30 second search. Ideally this will encourage people to bring some lighter mechs or face longer queue times. Fixed weight limit won't really fix much, and forced 2/2/2/2 just feels arbitrary. 2/2/2/2 would be better than what we have now though that's for dang sure.

And finally, I hope to see this game succeed in the deepest way possible. I really feel like this game is allllmost the best game ever, and with a little bit better balance and much better stability it'll be awesome. I want everyone who plays this game to have fun, so hopefully my tier list and my rant on the state of the game allow people who are frustrated and don't know why they are losing maybe to get a better of understanding of how to take their Mech roster to the next level and some basic metagame stuff.

I sorted it in order of what I thought was the absolute best Mech/weapon in the current game overall in terms of what they bring to a team. I noted what build next to the Mech in case anyone didn't know what to stick on it for maximum cheesy competition for the Mechs, and a brief reasoning on weaponry.

Right now in the current 4s environment most any high DPS boat can do great work, most pug games involve a lot of fast paced action and DPS is generally king. That means lots of heat stability, hopefully some speed so you can disengage and get good shots in, and plenty of high DPS weapons. In 4s I find that boats are generally the best Mechs because they have the highest DPS. Marmets /w 3xUAC5, 4p /w 9ML, these are extremely powerful Mechs in 4s. LRMs are also big in 4s still because ECM coverage is not universal. The Streakapult is still viable even for that reason, but if you draw against an ECM team your Streakapult is dead meat.

For the 8s environment I think running rush strats with brawlers (fast heavies, DDCs, 3Ls) is a good idea, or doing high alpha snipers (DDCs, 3Ls, 3D /w 2xERPPC 1xGauss, 3D /w 2xGauss, K2 /w 2xGauss, RS /w 4xLL or 4xPPC etc). Basically long range alpha builds. It's pretty much one or the other and you want to have a lot of ECM and you also want your team to be on the same page. A PPC atlas is not really gonna contribute as much in a brawler team as vice versa and brawler won't live up to his potential on a sniper team.

LRMs generally aren't very effective due to universal ECM coverage, and streaks are only useful on 3Ls/DDCs that can get into counter-ECM wars to use their OP streaks.

In general any build that has a dedicated use for all of it's weapons will do well. I highly recommend going for two discreet ranges, usually long range direct fire + close range brawling. For example have two long ranged weapons that you can fire in the initial skirmishes as well as a complementary low-heat high dps knife fighting backup. PPCs + SRMs + MLs for example is a deadly combo (ala centurion, hunchback. Alternatively insane alpha builds always have a place at any range. SRM6 alpha juggernauts and massive laser boats, or just an array of large high impact weaponry.

Right now, in my opinion, the meta favors 270-600 meter engagement ranges pretty heavily. Most of the fighting that results in kills happens in these ranges, so optimizing to keep that range and thrive in it with speed and weaponry that's well suited to the task is crucial.

MECH TIERS

S - God tier (stack these guys to win cheesy)

Atlas DDC (Streaks + Whatever), Raven 3L (Streaks), Catapult A1 (SRM6+Artemis), Cataphract 1X (5xLL), Cataphract 3D (4xML, 2xGauss, JJ), Catapult K2 (2xGauss/AC20)


A - Highly Competitive

Commando 2D (streaks), Cicada 3M (MPL/ML), Hunchback 4P (9ML), Atlas D/RS, Ilya Muromets (3xUAC5/AC10), HBK-4SP, Dragon 1C (4xLL, Endo, DHS, XL), Catapult C1, Dragon 5N (3xAC2), Cataphract 4X (4xAC2/AC5).


B - Workable

Catapult C4, Cataphract 2X, Jenner D (Such a fall from grace), Jenner F (Barely even acceptable now as well),

F - No way jose

Jenner K, Dragon 1N, Commandos, Ravens, Hunchbacks/Centurions, Cicadas, Awesomes.

WEAPONS

S - God tier

Streaks (OP, if you can use 'em), Artemis SRM4/6 (Short range but OP damage), Gauss (ideal alpha/dps), AC10 (great alpha/dps), Medium Laser (ideal mix of range, damage, and heat), Large Laser (Great mix of range, damage, and heat)

A - Highly Competitive

UAC5 (Jams, but works great when boated), AC20 (sick alpha, high heat), AC2 (high heat high dps), Medium Pulse Laser (nice DPS/heat) , PPCs (high heat high alpha),

B - Workable

LRMs (too hard to land, but good damage), non-artemis SRMs (not enough range), AC5 (not enough dps), LBX10 (not enough range), ER Large Laser (too hot), Large Pulse Laser (too hot, not enough range), Small laser (not enough range), Small Pulse Laser (not enough range), ER PPCS (too hot).

Edited by Captain Midnight, 15 February 2013 - 03:25 PM.


#2 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:26 AM

You are right TL:DR
Might I suggest less Red Bull/monster more sleep. :)

#3 Monkey Bone

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 726 posts
  • LocationFinland

Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:29 AM

HBK-4SP to A tier.

How does the 1x with 5ll work? So far myself have piloted it with 5x medlas and ac20 + std 300.

#4 Captain Midnight

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 657 posts

Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:39 AM

View PostJules Gonzales, on 12 December 2012 - 05:29 AM, said:

HBK-4SP to A tier.

How does the 1x with 5ll work? So far myself have piloted it with 5x medlas and ac20 + std 300.


340XL Engine, Endosteel, DHS, 5xLL, fill 'er up with heatsinks. Strip a tad bit of armor from the arms and legs in order to fill up all your criticals. Travels a mean 85kmph and can alphastrike two or perhaps three times before overheat. It's why the 4P isn't higher, because in 8s the weight doesn't matter and in 4s there aren't any ECM heavies so you're doing your team a favour.

Edited by Captain Midnight, 12 December 2012 - 05:40 AM.


#5 MrPenguin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 1,815 posts
  • LocationSudbury, Ontario

Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:44 AM

Theirs only 2 tiers

MAN-DO Tier: Commandos

**** Tier: Everything else

You guys all know this to be true.

#6 PurpleNinja

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 2,097 posts
  • LocationMIA

Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:46 AM

TL,DR.

:) :(

#7 Buck Cake

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 259 posts

Posted 12 December 2012 - 05:58 AM

D-DC - the only game in town.

Would be cool if we could sticky this...

#8 Monkey Bone

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 726 posts
  • LocationFinland

Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:08 AM

View PostCaptain Midnight, on 12 December 2012 - 05:39 AM, said:


340XL Engine, Endosteel, DHS, 5xLL, fill 'er up with heatsinks. Strip a tad bit of armor from the arms and legs in order to fill up all your criticals. Travels a mean 85kmph and can alphastrike two or perhaps three times before overheat. It's why the 4P isn't higher, because in 8s the weight doesn't matter and in 4s there aren't any ECM heavies so you're doing your team a favour.

Think my std-300 might work? not gonna buy large lasers if they won't even work.

#9 Taizan

    Com Guard

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,692 posts
  • LocationGalatea (NRW)

Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:09 AM

Your thoughts probably reflect what most people think (I share some of them as well) about the current state of the game. Lots of statements put together in one post, though personally I wouldn't put too much emphasis into such things as long as they aren't set in stone. I feel that the game state is too unsettled with new things dropping in every 1-2 weeks imo, some of them major like new mechs, equipment and massive buffs/nerfs.

So this is a point I am kind of missing in your competitive view. The game is still lacking in stability of features and reliance to actually create an environment for general competetive teamplay ("for the masses"). With all the changing features, issues and tweaking going on during this launch stage, there is imo too much uncertainty and wonkiness to deal with.

The tier lists remind me a lot of WoW where people would try to find out which DD does the highest raid DPS and then only stack those for a raid, ignoring anything else. Sure you will possibly get a world first on a boss - but this competitive level of playing is just the very tip of the iceberg and usually its less the class but more the players and teamwork behind it, squeezing out the maximum performance.

Players deciding which mech they'll play next based on some lists or spreadsheets will not necessarily be as efficient or satisfied as they might be playing a chassis they actually enjoy to play.

Edited by Taizan, 12 December 2012 - 06:11 AM.


#10 Wingbreaker

    Troubadour

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 1,724 posts
  • LocationThe city that care forgot

Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:11 AM

O lawdy, dragons. I like how the 1C and 5N's worst configs are "Highly competitive," but the 1N is "No way jose."

#11 Monkey Bone

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 726 posts
  • LocationFinland

Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:12 AM

View PostWingbreaker, on 12 December 2012 - 06:11 AM, said:

O lawdy, dragons. I like how the 1C and 5N's worst configs are "Highly competitive," but the 1N is "No way jose."

I haven't used the dragons that much, but if the 1C is the 4 energy variant, it deserves the spot there. Other dragons are "No way jose" tier, as you would say.

#12 Kdogg788

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 2,314 posts

Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:12 AM

Great post, but, I have to disagree that:

A: Many kills I've seen happen within 270 meters, not beyond it as players rush to get inside the ECM.
B: Hunchbacks and Awesomes aren't always useless. The Hunch is still the best medium in my opinion, and we have a couple great Awesome drivers that would make some people out there rethink the opinion that Awesomes are no good. The trial is junk though.
C: I wouldn't put the AC10 in the god weapon tier. The UAC5 belongs there. It runs great when properly used and macroed.

-k

#13 Monkey Bone

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 726 posts
  • LocationFinland

Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:18 AM

View PostKdogg788, on 12 December 2012 - 06:12 AM, said:

Great post, but, I have to disagree that:

A: Many kills I've seen happen within 270 meters, not beyond it as players rush to get inside the ECM.
B: Hunchbacks and Awesomes aren't always useless. The Hunch is still the best medium in my opinion, and we have a couple great Awesome drivers that would make some people out there rethink the opinion that Awesomes are no good. The trial is junk though.
C: I wouldn't put the AC10 in the god weapon tier. The UAC5 belongs there. It runs great when properly used and macroed.

-k

I have to disagree with the awesome.

1. It's not an Atlas
2. If you want lasers, there is the 4p
3. Slow (excluding the 9m, which seems like the best variant right now)
4. 4x SRM6 might sound cool, but then again it's not the Atlas, which has ECM, 1 less SRM, which it also replaces with the gauss/ac.

And to add up, AC10 has a good DPS, higher than the AC20 if we count in the tonnage ratio too. Then again it doesnt have the massive burst AC20 has. *AT* least high-tier weapon i say.

Edited by Jules Gonzales, 12 December 2012 - 06:20 AM.


#14 Wingbreaker

    Troubadour

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Sureshot
  • The Sureshot
  • 1,724 posts
  • LocationThe city that care forgot

Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:27 AM

View PostJules Gonzales, on 12 December 2012 - 06:12 AM, said:

I haven't used the dragons that much, but if the 1C is the 4 energy variant, it deserves the spot there. Other dragons are "No way jose" tier, as you would say.


I lol'd at bad designers. Just for example, the 'no way jose' 1N can run an SRM 8/SSRM4 (Depending on ECM support), Dual Mlas and Gauss, just as an example of its builds. It's hardly a weak chassis with a 45Alpha @81kph and enough ammo and heat eff to last all day.

#15 Monkey Bone

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 726 posts
  • LocationFinland

Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:31 AM

View PostWingbreaker, on 12 December 2012 - 06:27 AM, said:

I lol'd at bad designers. Just for example, the 'no way jose' 1N can run an SRM 8/SSRM4 (Depending on ECM support), Dual Mlas and Gauss, just as an example of its builds. It's hardly a weak chassis with a 45Alpha @81kph and enough ammo and heat eff to last all day.

Gauss is overnerfed, it can explode even before the armor is stripped off that location. I wouldn't use the gauss myself. Agree on the ssrm4 though, but now that we have ECM...

Edited by Jules Gonzales, 12 December 2012 - 06:31 AM.


#16 Mr 144

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,777 posts
  • LocationWisconsin

Posted 12 December 2012 - 06:34 AM

1st...sry I dropped earlier..complete internet meltdown...

CTF-2X: std 280, 3xML, 2xASRM6, AC20....only 'workable' ? why? just moving on to the other variants in the next few days, but not many builds sport a repeatable 65 alpha...35 of which are pinpoint damage.

Mr 144

#17 p00k

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,661 posts

Posted 12 December 2012 - 07:21 AM

View PostCaptain Midnight, on 12 December 2012 - 05:25 AM, said:

MECH TIERS

S - God tier (stack these guys to win cheesy)

Atlas DDC (Streaks + Whatever), Raven 3L (Streaks), Catapult A1 (SRM6+Artemis), Cataphract 1X (5xLL), Cataphract 3D (4xML, 2xGauss, JJ), Catapult K2 (2xGauss/AC20)


A - Highly Competitive

Commando 2D (streaks), Cicada 3M (MPL/ML), Hunchback 4P (9ML), Atlas D/RS, Ilya Muromets (3xUAC5/AC10), HBK-4SP, Dragon 1C (4xLL, Endo, DHS, XL), Catapult C1, Dragon 5N (3xAC2), Cataphract 4X (4xAC2/AC5).


B - Workable

Catapult C4, Cataphract 2X, Jenner D (Such a fall from grace), Jenner F (Barely even acceptable now as well),

F - No way jose

Jenner K, Dragon 1N, Commandos, Ravens, Hunchbacks/Centurions, Cicadas, Awesomes.

WEAPONS

S - God tier

Streaks (OP, if you can use 'em), Artemis SRM4/6 (Short range but OP damage), Gauss (ideal alpha/dps), AC10 (great alpha/dps), Medium Laser (ideal mix of range, damage, and heat), Large Laser (Great mix of range, damage, and heat)

A - Highly Competitive

UAC5 (Jams, but works great when boated), AC20 (sick alpha, high heat), AC2 (high heat high dps), Medium Pulse Laser (nice DPS/heat) , PPCs (high heat high alpha),

B - Workable

LRMs (too hard to land, but good damage), non-artemis SRMs (not enough range), AC5 (not enough dps), LBX10 (not enough range), ER Large Laser (too hot), Large Pulse Laser (too hot, not enough range), Small laser (not enough range), Small Pulse Laser (not enough range), ER PPCS (too hot).

god tier:
ddc you dont need streaks. just pack srm's and learn to aim with them. that way you can keep your ecm disrupting the enemy's. plus, your job will be to kill the other team's atlases, not fight off their ravens
having played and mastered both those cataphracts, they both suck, though that build of 3d is a bit better than that build of 1x.
k2 is hardly god tier now, maybe tier a or b

tier a:
9ml hbk4p is still too hot even with all the fixins

tier b:
i'd bump jenner f to tier a. only people who got complacent with streaks think the f is worse than the d, especially now with ecm. sure the netcode is still broken, but the f is still better, especially as a backstabber



for weapons
god tier:
streaks are only useful on a few mechs now with ecm being so prevalent
artemis is useless with ecm being so prevalent, just take regular srm's and learn their two convergence ranges
gauss is maybe tier b now, anyone good with gauss can switch over to ac10 (or dual ac5 if you have the hardpoints/crits/tons)
funny you don't mention tonnage when talking mlas vs llas, since that's where mlas comes out on top. with respect to range, damage, and heat, llas > mlas. it's more heat efficient for damage, does more damage per hardpoint, and has longer range, it's simply less tonnage-efficient

tier a
ac20, 2, and ppcs are tier b. ac5 is tier a. it's the most heat efficient of the ac's, and while it does a bit less than the others when it comes to pure dps, it makes up for it with heat/range/projectile speed/tonnage/ammo. ac2 has high dps and good range but spreads damage everywhere and forces you to be in the open and vulnerable to take full advantage of it. ac20 is still too heat inefficient, too short range, too slow of a projectile, and gets crit out too easily, and can only be put in certain mechs with certain builds. ppc still sucks, though not as much as er ppcs

tier b
again, ac5 is better than these. so are srm's without artemis. id put smlas into tier a also, they're still useful in lighter mechs when boated.

#18 Kommisar

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 462 posts
  • LocationTennessee

Posted 12 December 2012 - 07:32 AM

A good read. A well thought out, well organized and structured write up of your observations of the current state of the game. I also tend to largely agree with your overall assessment; though I will admit to not having nearly as much experience in the 8v8 game. I would bump the Awesome up a tier in PUG/4 play; but that is minor. I would also say that, in my experience, a double stack of AC/5s is a bit better than a single AC/10 where it is possible to do so; such as an Atlas. One less heat, more range, higher velocity round and a bit of redundancy in getting the weapon knocked out by a crit.

I do enjoy that you have gone into the binary that exists with LRMs and Streaks right now between Over-Powered and Useless. To often, everything I read here is strong emotional rants one way or the other and leaves no room for a reasoned look at the nuances of an issue. I hope the Devs read that part.

#19 MaddMaxx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 5,911 posts
  • LocationNova Scotia, Canada

Posted 12 December 2012 - 07:45 AM

View PostJules Gonzales, on 12 December 2012 - 06:31 AM, said:

Gauss is overnerfed, it can explode even before the armor is stripped off that location. I wouldn't use the gauss myself. Agree on the ssrm4 though, but now that we have ECM...


One can assume that when the Dev correct the currently Pixilated 7X ZOOM feature, then the Gauss will once again find it proper place on the battlefield. That being, at LONG Range, with a solid LOS position, tearing 30pt chunks off of anything/anyone that dares stand still long enough to get noticed. :)

#20 MrPenguin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 1,815 posts
  • LocationSudbury, Ontario

Posted 12 December 2012 - 07:47 AM

View PostMaddMaxx, on 12 December 2012 - 07:45 AM, said:


One can assume that when the Dev correct the currently Pixilated 7X ZOOM feature, then the Gauss will once again find it proper place on the battlefield.


You don't actually need 7X zoom to hit stuff from very far away with gauss. That would just make it easier.





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users