3Rd Person "soon" According To Mwo Twitter
#1
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:36 PM
#2
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:37 PM
PGI, why didn't you purchase the license to MW4 from mek-tek? It's clearly the game you wanted to make.
#3
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:38 PM
THE QQ STORM OF OUR GENERATION IS APPROACHING!
Edited by MrPenguin, 20 March 2013 - 07:42 PM.
#4
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:38 PM
#5
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:39 PM
#6
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:39 PM
give it a shot. they can always take it out.
i hope they don't screw up tho.
personally am looking froward to seein my own camo spec
Edited by Tennex, 20 March 2013 - 08:24 PM.
#7
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:40 PM
Tennex, on 20 March 2013 - 07:39 PM, said:
Why do people say this? Do you realize this represents significant time, energy, and effort on PGI's part to develop, bugtest, bugfix, and "balance" a new feature like 3rd person cam? There's a whole mess of technical problems that need to get fixed. If PGI is busy working on a 3rd person camera no one bloody wants, they -aren't- working on other features that we DO want, like Community Warfare, improved netcode, and performance fixes.
Edited by Josef Nader, 20 March 2013 - 07:41 PM.
#8
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:40 PM
Truely they listen to our input and give us what the playerbase wants.
Unfortunately, that's the CoD playerbase.
Edited by QuantumButler, 20 March 2013 - 07:40 PM.
#9
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:40 PM
but it cannot keep up very fast
#10
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:40 PM
Edited by Infernus1986, 20 March 2013 - 07:41 PM.
#11
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:40 PM
#12
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:41 PM
Tennex, on 20 March 2013 - 07:39 PM, said:
i hope they don't screw up tho.
personally am looking froward to seein my own camo spec
To be honest, you're the first person I was expecting to completely start biting and clawing this thing to oblivion.
To say this post was a surprise is an understatement.
#13
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:41 PM
#14
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:42 PM
We tried to tell others what they would do.
It seems we've failed.
PGI is going back on their word. On Coolant. On Golden Ammo. Third person.
Even if they come out to deny Garth's comment and this twitter post, why should we believe them?
#15
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:42 PM
#16
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:42 PM
MrPenguin, on 20 March 2013 - 07:41 PM, said:
To say this post was a surprise is an understatement.
i'm not the person you think i am
i think we all have the games best interest in mind. i'm open to anything that may add to the playerbase
Edited by Tennex, 20 March 2013 - 07:43 PM.
#19
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:44 PM
daemur, on 20 March 2013 - 07:42 PM, said:
Me. Unless I was 4th person... I don't remember my assignment.
To be fair though most MW's have had 3rd person and most actual simulators I seem to have also have it so in a way it seems funny to not be here. Not that I would bother using it.
#20
Posted 20 March 2013 - 07:45 PM
There are much better things they can be working on aka Community Warfare, the Clans, dynamic terrain, netcode, 12v12
Hell anything besides a feature 90% of the people on here dont want. Does Hawken have 3rd person?
I'll give it a chance, but my hopes are low.
I am supposed to feel like a pilot in a 100 ton tank, not an autonomous robot with Gears of War style view.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users