Next Is Mech You'd Like To See?
#81
Posted 16 November 2013 - 11:22 AM
#82
Posted 18 November 2013 - 03:06 PM
Levi Porphyrogenitus, on 16 November 2013 - 05:45 AM, said:
Here you go, although I am not sure why you want another 25ton mech.
Khorn1, on 16 November 2013 - 11:22 AM, said:
Sorry, only IS mechs here.
#83
Posted 18 November 2013 - 04:35 PM
Red squirrel, on 16 November 2013 - 12:09 AM, said:
It's a fair point, but it cannot stand against the power of nostalgia.
Ngamok, on 16 November 2013 - 10:37 AM, said:
We should get along flawlessly.
#86
Posted 20 November 2013 - 06:35 AM
Red squirrel, on 06 November 2013 - 08:12 AM, said:
With project Pheonix all reseen are on the table again (IMHO).
It's so difficult to decide for 3. (Hollander, Crab, Mauler)
But I'd also like (Archer, Marauder, Hamamoto-Chi, Cyclops, King Crab)
But then it would be sad if Annihilator and King Crab would own the Atlas.
Shouldn't the Atlas be the king? Imagine what mosterous alphas the Annihilator and King Crab would be capable of. (At least the Annihilator is dead slow with 32KPH engine
I think that is what you sacrifice for the fire power. Still, some people will drop the quad Medium Pulse Lasers and up the engine size, maybe even change two of the LBX 10's to straight AC10 single slug cannons so they have something to rip open enemies with. It's intended to be an urban combat and base defender, not a front line Assault Mech.
#87
Posted 20 November 2013 - 06:49 AM
Ngamok, on 15 November 2013 - 11:08 AM, said:
Because it's been said in so many threads but people just keep mentioning it. Sure you can dream if you want. But why even bother brining it up. And I only hit upon the Rifleman one because it was the most recent thread. Yes, include the Warhammer, Marauder, Longbow, Archer, Rifleman, Phoenix Hawk, Ost series, and whatever else HG still holds in their grubby hands.
*fixed*
I am just being funny.
You are aware that the Longbow was in MW4 right?
#88
Posted 20 November 2013 - 08:25 AM
Drunk Canuck, on 20 November 2013 - 06:49 AM, said:
http://mecha-zone.de...bow-A-127181661
And:
http://www.macross2....-schematics.gif
Edited by Ngamok, 20 November 2013 - 08:26 AM.
#89
Posted 20 November 2013 - 11:54 AM
#90
Posted 20 November 2013 - 11:56 AM
#91
Posted 20 November 2013 - 11:59 AM
Ecliptor, on 20 November 2013 - 11:56 AM, said:
funny, because i prefer to not have melee weapons, but the hatchetman is all about melee. So, if we do add the hatchetman, then i guess i'd be ok with melee weapons.
#92
Posted 20 November 2013 - 05:12 PM
#93
Posted 20 November 2013 - 05:12 PM
For melee combat there would have to be mech and pilot attributes to unlock for better control, accuracy, and reflex speed.
#94
Posted 27 November 2013 - 10:08 AM
http://www.sarna.net/wiki/Thunder_Fox this is thunder fox btw
#96
Posted 28 November 2013 - 01:08 AM
I want to see the Annihilator and Panther or UrbanMech - simple to see how the QQ rises;
Annihilator is OP - (4 ballistic hardpoints in 4 locations)
Panther is worthless (to slow -not enough armor)
I knew - sometimes i only want to watch the world burning
#97
Posted 04 December 2013 - 06:06 PM
#98
Posted 05 December 2013 - 01:49 PM
BUT
I also voted for the black knight because the thing looks boss. Can't beat that shield arm.
#99
Posted 08 December 2013 - 01:26 PM
Karl Streiger, on 28 November 2013 - 01:08 AM, said:
I want to see the Annihilator and Panther or UrbanMech - simple to see how the QQ rises;
Annihilator is OP - (4 ballistic hardpoints in 4 locations)
Panther is worthless (to slow -not enough armor)
I knew - sometimes i only want to watch the world burning
The Annihilator would certainly rule deathmatch but in a game mode where you need to move 32.4 KPH max speed is quite limiting.
#100
Posted 22 January 2014 - 11:46 AM
You didn't have the Firestarter
Ambuscade
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users