Terrible Gtx 970 Experience With Mwo.
#101
Posted 21 March 2015 - 07:00 PM
#102
Posted 22 March 2015 - 08:09 AM
xWiredx, on 21 March 2015 - 07:00 PM, said:
Ha ha... I wish I had your problem and the "lowly" GTX 980 you have.... lol. I am sure it would produce better results then my XFX 7970 gb at 1440P for sure.
Edited by Bill Lumbar, 22 March 2015 - 08:10 AM.
#103
Posted 22 March 2015 - 08:30 AM
I dropped a few settings and it does run smoother. I had a R9 290x prior to upgrading and there was not much advantage going from AMD to NVIDIA. I can say that the power draw and heat is way less.
Also, I heard the GTX 970 was only using 3.5gb of memory instead of the advertised 4gb.
I got this off MSI forum:
[color=#FFFFFF]So we have now had it confirmed that the specification of the 970 GTX was wrong. These specifications were released by Nvidia and these were the specifications printed on the box of my MSI Gaming 970 4G. Namely that card has 4G of Vram running on a 256 bit bus. In reality we now know that only 7/8th (3.5G) of the 4G vram operates at the expected 224 Gb/sec memory bandwidth. We also know that the cards performance will seriously degrade in scenarios where a game tries to access that last 0.5G of vram.[/color]
[color=#FFFFFF]Games increasingly used up more Vram when using high res texture packs. Also running higher resolutions and sli profiles require much more Vram and can easily exceed 3.5G.[/color]
[color=#FFFFFF][/color]
#104
Posted 22 March 2015 - 11:29 AM
Bill Lumbar, on 22 March 2015 - 08:09 AM, said:
Yeah, not sure how this guy with a Titan X and a 4.7GhZ 5820K is getting worse frame rates than I am. Gremlins and unicorns most likely.
#105
Posted 22 March 2015 - 04:40 PM
xWiredx, on 22 March 2015 - 11:29 AM, said:
Not to mention his alleged 4K testing on his system. all the while running a 1440P monitor. hmmmmmmm!?!
#106
Posted 22 March 2015 - 05:50 PM
Smokeyjedi, on 22 March 2015 - 04:40 PM, said:
Actually, I think that's possible with DSR or whatever it is in the Nvidia control panel. Nvidia gave us an easy way of doing downsampling. I don't like it much, but to each their own.
#107
Posted 27 March 2015 - 09:19 AM
#108
Posted 22 July 2015 - 09:36 PM
#109
Posted 26 July 2015 - 07:19 AM
Edited by Gremlich Johns, 26 July 2015 - 07:21 AM.
#110
Posted 08 December 2015 - 10:31 AM
since i have my new pc with an i5 and a gtx750ti and 8 gig of ram i play the game all maxed out
with postAA on (playing on dx9, msaa is too much for my system) i play with 40 fps worst case is 30 fps.I know this comment sucks, but MWO really seems to favor pentium proccessors
#111
Posted 27 October 2016 - 10:49 AM
knightsljx, on 29 November 2014 - 10:14 AM, said:
Without even reading, I can tell you that GPU does next to nothing for MWO. You'd have known this if you did a quick search on the forums.
Just turn Particles and Efffects to low and Shadow to Medium. You can leave the rest on very high on a GTX970. I push between 45-110 FPS on my i5-3570K with GTX970 on those settings.
If you upgraded your GFX card just for MWO, I'm sorry to tell you but you should have upgraded your CPU instead.
why bother to answer when not even reading oO?
#112
Posted 27 October 2016 - 11:47 AM
Edited by Tarl Cabot, 27 October 2016 - 11:48 AM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users