Easy guys, easy...
I feel compelled to tell a story along these lines from last week: CSB/Not so CSB ahead. Skip over this post if not interested.
Got in a pug drop with FRR last week and found 2 other -MS- people in the group who had already dropped with most members of the team once or twice. The rest of the group was a mix of -SO-, 1st Hussars, 1COG, and some other non-unit affiliated pugs. They had grouped up in game to form a group of 9-ish or so. One of the -MS- guys was calling the drop. We attacked Taiga, found a group of pugs and won easily using a traditional -MS- attack plan.
Next drop, most everyone stuck around, but the -MS- DC had to take off and I took over at the group's request. As luck would have it, we attacked Taiga again and drew another pug opponent so I said we'd basically repeat the exercise. One of the guys asked me to explain in more detail the reasons for doing what we were doing in the drop beyond "go here, shoot that, stay together". So I got pretty verbose about why we opened the gate we did, why we left the other one closed, the decision point once inside the gate to move left or right based on the enemy's deployment, why we wanted to move to a particular spot and hold it for a bit, how to move up through the buildings in a way that prevented us from separating and getting isolated, why it's important to get the turrets when the opportunity presents itself, and so on.
The other -MS- person in the drop made the point that calling the drop is actually a small part of the success. It only works if the team trusts the caller and also has the ability to do what's being asked. It's not so much that there's only one right way to win, but more that using this particular attack plan did not lend itself to things like LRM's or long range sniping. Taiga is a brawly map and needs brawly mechs and tactics to do well, especially on attack, and especially the way we were doing it (i.e. move to the middle and hold the buildings between the gates).
In the end we won with an even more lopsided score than in the first match. The reason we did so well was because the team as a whole was able to perform in alignment with the attack strategy. There wasn't (as best I recall) any sense of "MUST ATTACK THIS WAY TO WIN, YOU NOOBS!!!" dynamic going on, just more of, "now that we've decided to attack using this plan, this is what needs to happen to make this successful". It was a truly cooperative effort and everything gelled just right.
This wan't the only way to attack Taiga, but it's a way -MS- has had consistent success with and one that's pretty easy to replicate with groups that haven't played together consistently. I got the impression everyone in the group was ok with it (at least I didn't hear any dissent), and I had no problem explaining the reasoning behind the various calls I was making. Don't know for sure if it helped anyone on the team with future matches, but I hope it did.
Pretty sure I was drinking and eating bacon while all of this was going on. Anyway, good times in the FRR. Hope to come back soon.
Edited by Khereg, 24 July 2015 - 07:48 AM.