22 replies to this topic

[Scout Derek]

Following the Topic: http://mwomercs.com/...the-nerfsbuffs/

[FupDup]

This thread makes Wubhawk sad.

[Scout Derek]

FupDup, on 21 May 2015 - 07:54 AM, said:

This thread makes Wubhawk sad.

This thread can make Wubhawk happy if the community thinks it's fine.

[Zeusus]

Scout Derek, on 21 May 2015 - 07:57 AM, said:

This thread can make Wubhawk happy if the community thinks it's fine.

Oh really? I don't see an option for buffs... Perhaps you can point it out?

[Scout Derek]

Zeusus, on 21 May 2015 - 08:03 AM, said:

Oh really? I don't see an option for buffs... Perhaps you can point it out?

Some are going to be chosen for nerfs, some will be chosen for buffs.

[Templar Dane]

Scout Derek, on 21 May 2015 - 08:04 AM, said:

Some are going to be chosen for nerfs, some will be chosen for buffs.

Arbitrarily decided by.........you, I assume?

It's good that you're not being biased or anything. I'm sure the whole topic disregarding all inner sphere mechs is unintentional.

[Scout Derek]

lordtzar, on 21 May 2015 - 08:07 AM, said:

Arbitrarily decided by.........you, I assume?

It's good that you're not being biased or anything. I'm sure the whole topic disregarding all inner sphere mechs is unintentional.

No, for now, think of it as a phase.

Phase 1: determine the communities stand on clan mechs

Phase 2: determine the communities stand on Inner Sphere Mechs

Phase 3 determine if the Clan mechs/ Is mechs are buffed/nerfed appropriately.

[FupDup]

I want to know who voted for "many nerfs." Wubhawk wants to know...

[Juodas Varnas]

FupDup, on 21 May 2015 - 08:21 AM, said:

I want to know who voted for "many nerfs." Wubhawk wants to know...

Whoever voted for that, has a terrible sense of humor.

[Moldur]

I think the Warhawk can get away with not being nerfed. The only build that I can see people wanting to be nerfed is the "meta" 4xLPL build. Everything else is fine, and with that "meta" build, the hardpoints are only in the arms, which are huge, knuckle draggers.

Sure, you can do a lot of damage with it, and I can see how a 12 man of nothing but Warhawks with LPL could be stupid as hell to play against, but that's nothing different from any of the other viable assaults really.

The wubhawk is good at what it does, but it has the glaring weakness of meh hardpoint height, easy component hitbox, and comparative uselessness in brawling/close range due to the previous factors as well as its heat. Just the other day I proceeded to blow the arms off one and watch it run around like a headless chicken. It was fun.

[Kyynele]

Biased poll is biased.

The only options are "needs nerfs" and "is fine." It's not fine. It's pretty bad. I could vote an option like "it doesn't need nerfs", but can't vote "it's fine."

[FupDup]

Kyynele, on 21 May 2015 - 08:59 AM, said:

Biased poll is biased.

The only options are "needs nerfs" and "is fine." It's not fine. It's pretty bad. I could vote an option like "it doesn't need nerfs", but can't vote "it's fine."

I think that's the way that each of Scout's threads here should've been.


Q: How is the balance of the [Insert Mech Name Here]?

A. Big nerfs
B. Small nerfs
C. Nothing
D. Small buffs
E. Big buffs

Edited by FupDup, 21 May 2015 - 09:04 AM.

[Scout Derek]

FupDup, on 21 May 2015 - 09:00 AM, said:

I think that's the way that each of Scout's threads here should've been.


Q: How is the balance of the [Insert Mech Name Here]?

A. Big nerfs
B. Small nerfs
C. Nothing
D. Small buffs
E. Big buffs

Should I change now, or in later posts?

First time I'm doing crap like this...

[FupDup]

Scout Derek, on 21 May 2015 - 09:04 AM, said:

Should I change now, or in later posts?

First time I'm doing crap like this...

The fire is already burning, so changing now could cause confusions... Try it with the future ones whenever you get to them.

[Scout Derek]

FupDup, on 21 May 2015 - 09:06 AM, said:

The fire is already burning, so changing now could cause confusions... Try it with the future ones whenever you get to them.

Alright, the next ones will have what you have suggested.

[VinJade]

lets face it the whiners that got the poor TW and crow screwed up now wants to weaken even more clan mechs. deal with it clan tech is better as they ARE better same with their mechs.

they all should be getting buffs not nerfs more so removing the nerfs from the TW & Crow.
hell I don't even use 'em(hate the crow for other reasons) yet I don't think it is fair to give the clans the shaft any more than they have been.

[Scout Derek]

VinJade, on 21 May 2015 - 09:26 AM, said:

lets face it the whiners that got the poor TW and crow screwed up now wants to weaken even more clan mechs. deal with it clan tech is better as they ARE better same with their mechs.

Just to let you know, I don't own any timbers or crows.

[VinJade]

Never said you did.

[Nightmare1]

It could use a buff for certain systems. Why only nerf options? At least you left us with he "No" option.

Very leading of you Derek.

[Scout Derek]

Nightmare1, on 21 May 2015 - 10:31 AM, said:

It could use a buff for certain systems. Why only nerf options? At least you left us with he "No" option.

Very leading of you Derek.

Sorry nightmare1, please refer to my original thread, located in the general forums.

Going through stages right now to get a majority of votes to see who whats this and what.