Jump to content

Unit Implementation


28 replies to this topic

Poll: Unit Implementation (108 member(s) have cast votes)

Joining a unit

  1. Yes I would like to join a unit, have my pilot name changed to reflect the unit I have joined and I would like to primarily play with other members in my unit (46 votes [33.09%])

    Percentage of vote: 33.09%

  2. Yes I would like to join a unit, but I don't want to be stuck only playing with my unit (41 votes [29.50%])

    Percentage of vote: 29.50%

  3. Yes, however I would like to be able to join multiple units with individual pilots and pilot XP like more traditional MMORPG's (9 votes [6.47%])

    Percentage of vote: 6.47%

  4. I like the idea of unit implementation but I don't want it to impair my ability to enjoy the full MWO Universe regardless if I join a unit or not (32 votes [23.02%])

    Percentage of vote: 23.02%

  5. No, I do not want to join a unit and I don't want my game play effected by unit implementation (6 votes [4.32%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.32%

  6. Other, See below (5 votes [3.60%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.60%

Types of units

  1. I would like the full range of canon units available, Planetary Defense Forces, House units, Merc units and Clan Units (59 votes [47.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 47.20%

  2. I would like just canon house and clan units as well as player created Merc units (31 votes [24.80%])

    Percentage of vote: 24.80%

  3. I don't care what type of units are implemented (9 votes [7.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 7.20%

  4. I don't care what type of units are implemented and I don't want unit types to interfere with my being able to experience the full MWO universe game play to include Clantech (22 votes [17.60%])

    Percentage of vote: 17.60%

  5. Other, See Below (4 votes [3.20%])

    Percentage of vote: 3.20%

Pilot and player statistics

  1. I would like player, pilot and account statistics to be available to unit leaders for recruitment and vetting purposes as well as Merc contracts, I would also like the statistics to be greatly expanded to include role capability and efficiency (64 votes [52.89%])

    Percentage of vote: 52.89%

  2. I would like the account statistice to be available to unit leadership for recruitment and vetting purposes, as well as Merc Contracts (14 votes [11.57%])

    Percentage of vote: 11.57%

  3. I am not interesting in making the current statistics available (38 votes [31.40%])

    Percentage of vote: 31.40%

  4. Other, See below (5 votes [4.13%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.13%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 HC Harlequin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 655 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 01:31 AM

I personally would like to see units and unit implementation become a primary factor in gameplay, I put this poll together to identify a baseline.

#2 James The Fox Dixon

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 2,572 posts
  • LocationEpsilon Indi

Posted 15 November 2012 - 01:33 AM

Heyas Harlie,

I voted 1, 2, and 1 since I believe that will be a great asset to the game.

#3 HC Harlequin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 655 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 02:53 AM

bump for more votes

#4 Taizan

    Com Guard

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,692 posts
  • LocationGalatea (NRW)

Posted 15 November 2012 - 03:07 AM

1,1,1

Especially with question 3 I guess I'm not the only one who finds the current stats a bit meager - not role related or useful for recruitment.

For example I love to support heavies and assault with my medium or support a light with wearing down a target so the K/D ratio isn't really doing much for me as my goal is to assist - yeah sometimes I get the kill but most of the time it is someone else which is fine for me. Avoiding to overheat, avoiding loosing components, tagging enemies and protecting / supporting others are my primary goals in a match.
As we do not really know how much detail the match data has - in the end raw stats might not be useful for anyone or only in combination i.e "How many of the enemies that Taizan tagged were successfully hit by LRMs". So yes I'd like to see more useful and role related stats.

#5 Jun Watarase

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 3,504 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 03:16 AM

I know unit implementation is going in sooner or later, but i really dread seeing it happen. There was enough unit drama in closed beta, i can't imagine what it would be like when people are showing off their 'I AM STAR CAPTAIN FURFAG OF CLAN WULF WOOF WOLF" tags or whatever. Not to mention the whole rank circle jerk "I HAVE THE RANK OF COLONEL IN A FICTIONAL UNIT, LISTEN TO ME!!!! OMG U NOOBS!!!!".

And the game is already full of people ripping off canon units to try and make themselves appear more "legitimate" or as "badass" as the canon unit. Then there's going to be the clowns who make parody units like "G a y Death Legion" because "lulz we are so witty amirite guise???".

Edited by Jun Watarase, 15 November 2012 - 03:17 AM.


#6 Strum Wealh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Raider
  • The Raider
  • 5,025 posts
  • LocationPittsburgh, PA

Posted 15 November 2012 - 03:55 AM

I voted "other" for the first question - I generally agree with the first option, except for the name-changing aspect.
I voted for the first option in the second question, and the third option in the third question.

#7 Adrienne Vorton

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,535 posts
  • LocationBerlin/ Germany

Posted 15 November 2012 - 04:33 AM

for honour and glory of the Death´s Hand Brigade! /0

:rolleyes:

#8 HC Harlequin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 655 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 05:16 AM

Bump for more votes

#9 Reoh

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 959 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 05:55 AM

I would like the major canon units, but not necessarily every possible unit ever as the player base could become overly fragmented. I think it would be better if sub-units could be created for the major house units and that those could possibly use canon house affiliated units if they desired. I would like to be able to represent my unit, prefer to play with them, but not exclusively.

I believe that expanding the statistics for role could be good. I think it should be variable on mech class or possibly even chasis or variants. These statistics should be available to view publicly (anybody in game), privately (anybody on friends list), or not at all based on the user's profile choices. Some Units may feel the need to require revealing the statistics but it should be the player to decide whether or not to agree (possibly a secondary profile statistics preference option).

[edit]

PS - Would like to see units have their own chat, be able to form alliances with alliance chat and preferential to serve together on the field. I think it would be great if PGI would rent private servers to units so that they could practice together and invite opponents to play against them. These would be simulated matches and not award pay\repair costs.

Edited by Reoh, 15 November 2012 - 05:58 AM.


#10 HC Harlequin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 655 posts

Posted 15 November 2012 - 11:55 PM

Shameless bump for more votes

#11 Velba

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 414 posts
  • LocationSeattle, WA, USA

Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:05 AM

Nice poll! I voted 1/1/1, why wouldn't want all that stuff?!

#12 Kurayami

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Stone Cold
  • Stone Cold
  • 916 posts
  • LocationSochi

Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:19 AM

View PostVelba, on 16 November 2012 - 12:05 AM, said:

Nice poll! I voted 1/1/1, why wouldn't want all that stuff?!

^this^

also fix "see below" in last one please)

#13 Lyoto Machida

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 5,082 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 12:35 AM

View PostJun Watarase, on 15 November 2012 - 03:16 AM, said:

I know unit implementation is going in sooner or later, but i really dread seeing it happen. There was enough unit drama in closed beta, i can't imagine what it would be like when people are showing off their 'I AM STAR CAPTAIN FURFAG OF CLAN WULF WOOF WOLF" tags or whatever. Not to mention the whole rank circle jerk "I HAVE THE RANK OF COLONEL IN A FICTIONAL UNIT, LISTEN TO ME!!!! OMG U NOOBS!!!!".

And the game is already full of people ripping off canon units to try and make themselves appear more "legitimate" or as "badass" as the canon unit. Then there's going to be the clowns who make parody units like "G a y Death Legion" because "lulz we are so witty amirite guise???".


Have you ever posted anything positive towards non-PUG play?

#14 HC Harlequin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 655 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:29 AM

Bump for more votes

#15 ArmandTulsen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,184 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 02:55 AM

Oh, hell, yes.

1,1,1.

#16 HC Harlequin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 655 posts

Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:37 AM

Expanded the statistics questions in a related poll... http://mwomercs.com/...755-statistics/

#17 Joseph Mallan

    ForumWarrior

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • FP Veteran - Beta 1
  • 35,216 posts
  • Google+: Link
  • Facebook: Link
  • LocationMallanhold, Furillo

Posted 16 November 2012 - 03:56 AM

View PostReoh, on 15 November 2012 - 05:55 AM, said:

I would like the major canon units, but not necessarily every possible unit ever as the player base could become overly fragmented. I think it would be better if sub-units could be created for the major house units and that those could possibly use canon house affiliated units if they desired. I would like to be able to represent my unit, prefer to play with them, but not exclusively.

I believe that expanding the statistics for role could be good. I think it should be variable on mech class or possibly even chasis or variants. These statistics should be available to view publicly (anybody in game), privately (anybody on friends list), or not at all based on the user's profile choices. Some Units may feel the need to require revealing the statistics but it should be the player to decide whether or not to agree (possibly a secondary profile statistics preference option).

[edit]

PS - Would like to see units have their own chat, be able to form alliances with alliance chat and preferential to serve together on the field. I think it would be great if PGI would rent private servers to units so that they could practice together and invite opponents to play against them. These would be simulated matches and not award pay\repair costs.

I read a post a few months ago that once implemented in the Meta game (yet to be implemented) A pilot would earn "honor points" towards joining a canon house unit, and IIRC gaining rank. Chains of Command are a must for good coordination.

#18 HC Harlequin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Mercenary
  • Mercenary
  • 655 posts

Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:01 AM

shameless bump for more votes..
updated poll to come

#19 Teralitha

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 3,188 posts

Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:04 AM

""I would like the full range of canon units available, Planetary Defense Forces, House units, Merc units and Clan Units""

AND PIRATES!


How could you forget pirates... honestly..

Edited by Teralitha, 19 November 2012 - 11:05 AM.


#20 Agent of Change

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 3,119 posts
  • LocationBetween Now and Oblivion

Posted 19 November 2012 - 11:26 AM

I really don't care how it's implemented as long as three things happen:
  • 1. There are Pilots to fill the ranks of the Dead Man's Hand
  • 2. There are groups to pay us to kill other groups
  • 3. There are groups for us to kill when we are paid to.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users