5 replies to this topic

[Fherot]

Need some extra weight from my missile hard point to upgrade my engine.

What would fill this spot best?

1x SRM6 w/ Artemis FCS or 2x SRM4?

This is an otherwise stock Centurion CN9-D. I'm only upgrading gradually as I play matches. I honestly like the stock setup but I really need that extra speed more than the LRM10.

Thank you.

[Nothing Whatsoever]

Are you staying with an XL or going Standard? I assume XL, but asking to be sure.

And are you staying with the LB 10-X?

[Deathlike]

Two SRM4s are better.

When your right torso is exposed, the damage would be spread between both launchers instead of 1.

I don't think the ammo consumption at this point would be an issue.

[Fherot]

Standard engine, sticking to the AC10.

I have an alternate B I'm going to try as well but both work around the AC10 which I love.

Edit: good point about two launchers splitting the damage taken, I didn't think of that.

Edited by Fherot, 27 March 2013 - 10:24 AM.

[Nothing Whatsoever]

I ran an CN9-A similar to this for a bit, but then I decided to take off the Auto Cannon for a 275 engine and the three SRM6 and 2ML on that one.

So could this work for you on the CN9-D?

[Fherot]

I love my AC10, and I couldn't bring myself to have a centurion without a big ballistic... I know stats wise more missiles may be better but I have more fun with a big gun and I'm getting pretty good with free-look aiming it.