45 replies to this topic

[Implacable]

More mechs. Then I'd like to know more about the economics.

[Professor Sakharov]

I would absolutely love to see more news feeds leading up to the conflict. That would just be icing on the cake.

[Mal]

StrataDragoon, on 28 May 2012 - 01:18 PM, said:

should be interesting here peoples opinions.

*If you choose Other explain please

I'm a tad confused. The game is already in Beta... so the answer to what we can see before Beta would be... 'nothing'?

[Ian]

Not all of us have seen Beta though so we can see lots before we see Beta.

More Mechs and Maps are a definite, destructible terrain is also a must. A Campaign wont happen I don't think.

More game types would be fantastic in the long run. Raids and such as opposed to just battling for terrain.

[SGT_Stubby]

More news feeds would be great. Some kind of video to go along with the news feed would be awesome.

[Sen]

Before MwO had even been announced, I had a lot of dreams about the "ultimate MMO". . and this was the setting. My vision ALSO started approx 3049, due to the unstable climate around that time period. However, I was thinking more like the entire Inner Sphere wrapped into it. All IS factions were present, as well as Merc units [and potentially clans] World control completely controlled by players, with potentially thousands of people involved with the attack/defense of any given world [or broken down into strategic points on a world to scale down. . . but the original concept was that you'd have to spread out anyway. . .

Solaris VII was there, in all it's glory. So were tank and aerospace support/piloting [shouldn't take much to mod the interface]

It was never a question of what WOULD be included. . .more a matter of what WOULDN'T [ideally nothing] You could incorporate starter campaigns that group people of similar experience together to teach coordination, tactics, etc, based on your chosen. . "faction" [for lack of a better term"

Out in the thick of it, depending on the world, you'd have legendary mechwarriors on the field [either for or against] and all the fun and challenge that'd go along with it.

Granted, putting all that together would probably be an insane amount of work, not to mention implementing a lot of that would be difficult if not outright impossible [as written], but that's what has been drifting through my head for years. The best part is. . . with time it'd be easy to expand the current incarnation of the actual game to include things like this : )

[Lucky Clove]

I like tehbob and Ian's thoughts on this subject. I love to see a good amount of freedom in the mech lab and plenty of maps featuring destructable terrain would be great.

But on a personal note, I really want to see the Hollander.

[LordDeathStrike]

perfectblue, on 28 May 2012 - 01:29 PM, said:

Maps. Are you not exhausted from seeing the forest map in every bit of media published?

theres a city map too.

Hickory, on 28 May 2012 - 08:26 PM, said:

I like tehbob and Ian's thoughts on this subject. I love to see a good amount of freedom in the mech lab and plenty of maps featuring destructable terrain would be great.

But on a personal note, I really want to see the Hollander.

the hollander is 3054 or 3055 is it not?

[Valkyrie Onyx]

I think a Camaign feacher would be awesome! and have they even said anything about maps yet?

[UBCslayer]

StrataDragoon, on 28 May 2012 - 05:54 PM, said:

I totally agree with those that wanna see more maps
Im also kinda wanting to see how the campaign will look like
Good Story always put me in the mood to do multiplayer afterwards lol

I would enjoy some sort of campaign as well, but was under the impression that there would be no campaign included in MWO, it would simply be a PVP game. Can anyone verify this?

[Stormeris]

quads

[Ian]

I'm pretty sure you will be able to make a decent almost Hollander sooner than that. Its just a 35 tonner with a GR. Wait for a 35 tonner with a ballistic hard point and build it yourself. The problem imo is that the Hollander gives up way too much for that GR. No back up weapons, pathetic armor. GL to you is all i can say.

[ManDaisy]

I want to see how pulse lasers are doing right now.

Edited by ManDaisy, 28 May 2012 - 09:27 PM.

[Marrax]

I voted 'other' because i would like to see the physics of physical contact brought into the game. So many mechs would become available once physical combat is brought into the game (the Axeman for example [one of my favourites]).

And seriously seeing an Atlas punch in the cockpit of a Masakari is just priceless no matter how many times you see it.

[chutche2]

Really the main thing I want to know about is the campaign and factions and all that. Want to hear more about that whole aspect of the game.

[Chimerus]

More mechs! Id eventually like to see the MW4 roster imported (including the mektek, if possible). You can never have too many mechs!

[Kooky Carter]

I would really like to see some more maps; especially some form of an urban one that is intended for a lot of brawling.

And more Mechs would be awesome - who doesn't want to see more Mechs?

[_NARCoMAN_]

e3 should spill the rest of the beans

[CW Grayson]

More maps.
Would like to see indoor/cave maps, hot maps with lava streams, icy maps with vision-limiting snow, urban enviroment, map with base (maybe with turrets), maps with water where i can cool down with leg-mounted heatsinks or deeper water where i can hide with shutdown mech...

can think of many fancy stuff with maps, hope to see it done in the future.

Edited by CW Grayson, 29 May 2012 - 02:34 AM.

[Vladimarous]

Gotta love some mechs