Will The Jagermech Be The New Cat-K2?
#1
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:04 PM
#2
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:07 PM
#3
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:10 PM
Yes, 2xAC20 / Xl engine.
Edited by WolvesX, 24 February 2013 - 05:10 PM.
#4
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:11 PM
#5
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:12 PM
2 AC/20s with a 275-300XL -- 80KPH Boomcat is tempting
and
4 UAC/5s with a ~225-250XL -- painfully slow but that rapid fire might make it a powerful DPSer
Other than that, there doesn't seem to be a whole lot that the Jaeger can do that the K2 doesn't already cover.
#6
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:12 PM
I predict not so vulnerable cockpit.
#7
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:17 PM
Cos the jagermech has arms which can easily be shot off instead of a ridiculously small side torso profile.
Also looks like the jager has the same head size as an awesome.
It's as fat as an awesome.
No I'm predicting it won't come close to being K2 good.
#8
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:24 PM
#9
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:25 PM
Nauht, on 24 February 2013 - 05:17 PM, said:
Cos the jagermech has arms which can easily be shot off instead of a ridiculously small side torso profile.
Also looks like the jager has the same head size as an awesome.
fortunately the awesome now has a fairly tiny cockpit hitbox
also, who cares how easily the arms are shot off? a k2 you can shoot it in the head or ct and kill the mech outright for not much more effort than it would take to blow off half of its armament
#10
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:27 PM
Nauht, on 24 February 2013 - 05:17 PM, said:
Cos the jagermech has arms which can easily be shot off instead of a ridiculously small side torso profile.
Also looks like the jager has the same head size as an awesome.
It's as fat as an awesome.
No I'm predicting it won't come close to being K2 good.
well, the K2 will still be a better brawler, for sure- the Jagermech is supposed to be a long range platform- think gauss/ac5s and ac2s. you're not gonna see a lot of em within 270M but they can hurt hard out to 1000. Also, with gauss mounted in the arms you dont have to worry about crits damaging your XL engines - so dont think of this as another ac20 K2, think of it as the return of the gausscat
#11
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:36 PM
#12
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:38 PM
Midosa Kaze, on 24 February 2013 - 05:36 PM, said:
Base armor is utterly irrelevant given that it can be modified freely.
Still, problem will be tonnage... many folks may opt for glass cannon builds to run the kinds of ballistics the Jag will open up. 4 UAC is a dream, but probably not a realistic one.
#13
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:40 PM
Midosa Kaze, on 24 February 2013 - 05:36 PM, said:
It has the same armor capacity. The stock variants just allocate too little tonnage to armor in favor of the heavier weapons.
#14
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:41 PM
QUAD UAC5s, XL engine, Max armor, ENDOSTEEL and as much ammo you can push into the frame
good-day gentlemen.
#15
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:47 PM
p00k, on 24 February 2013 - 05:25 PM, said:
also, who cares how easily the arms are shot off? a k2 you can shoot it in the head or ct and kill the mech outright for not much more effort than it would take to blow off half of its armament
Nah far easier to blow the arms off something than core it.
It all depends on the situation and what is damaged but when I aim to neuter a mech the arms are far easier to disable than trying to knock out the K2's side torsos. Coring the K2 can be pita if he pilot knows what they're doing to mitigate damage.
Also the size of the head box doesn't matter so much when it's located down near the chest area. People are far more willing to take the headshot knowing that they're going to hit something if they miss - rather than just take the chance their shots will hit air as it misses a top mounted cockpit.
I'm calling that the jager won't be as effective as the K2 - we'll see how it turns out when it's released. We could go on theorycrafting til then.
#16
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:51 PM
Also it says these mechs were anti-air mechs. So if these things are built to target flying vehicles......balistic shoot down things faster then any mech..... It would be nice if it was a feared flak-88 type of mech.
Aiming up had better not be a problem right?
Talks about targeting computer....maybe that should give a advanced non-pip zoom.....quirk.
#17
Posted 24 February 2013 - 05:59 PM
(Also, do you want to pilot a quad AC2 or quad UAC5 Jagermech, yes or yes?)
Edited by Royalewithcheese, 24 February 2013 - 06:00 PM.
#18
Posted 24 February 2013 - 06:03 PM
#19
Posted 24 February 2013 - 06:05 PM
#20
Posted 24 February 2013 - 06:05 PM
20 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 20 guests, 0 anonymous users