DocBach, on 27 February 2013 - 08:29 AM, said:
I managed to get to the top 10 medium slot using a non-cheese, non FOTM build. I bought a CN9-A for the tournament (owned a 9D with the stock XL engine and a gauss rifle), didn't have much cash so I sold the LRM-10 for two SRM-6's and double heat sinks. I wanted to compete in the tournament without using a cheese 'Mech just to see how well I could do.
I didn't run the 3x SRM-6 large engine build because I couldn't afford a large engine, and when I could I decided I really liked the setup with the slow standard 200. The AC was great for making long range shots, or putting holes in stuff right where I wanted them, and the SRM's would exploit the damage.
So yes, I think an amount of individual skill can make up for not using kraft macaroni, at least a little bit.
Granted, but the post that I quoted implied that taking an inferior build makes you a more skilled pilot. That's not true. Your skill might be able to compensate for a bad build, but it doesn't make you better. Or cooler. Or anything but dead meat to an equally-skilled pilot in a better build.
Also, given the definition of "cheese" in other games is doing something unorthodox . . . is, say, a 3x SRM6 centurion or A1 splatcat really cheese since that's the most prevalent accepted build for those variants? That's akin to calling a FFE Protoss "cheese" in SC II, when it's in fact the most common thing ever.
Edited by Harrison Kelly, 27 February 2013 - 09:03 AM.
























