Hobietime, on 05 March 2013 - 12:36 PM, said:
Have you thought that maybe it's not PGI but IGP?
IGP is just like every publisher. They are the ones who monetize the game, not PGI. I am pretty sure this is something from them, not PGI.
Have you considered that it's PGI's place to stand up and say,
"That's not the game we sold the founders and current purchasers on."
or
"Hey guys IGP would like us to introduce new monetizing features, we are far too lazy to read the massive post about things you'd like to see implemented and would pay for, or the discussion of said things that puts them into reasonably balanced - implementable features"
Instead of "We are going to start implementing p2w features. Thanks for supporting us while our game was an interesting and fun development project. Make sure to post your thoughts about this in our thread because our pr team likes to post things like 'we value your opinion'."