I Don't Support P2W But...
#1
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:06 PM
For Christ' sake, every other thread is I HATE P2W GG PGI I'M GONNA QUIT...you guys haven't even TRIED it yet.
I realize that the MC version is directly better (by one module slot), but honestly, let's just see how it plays out first?
I do realize why many people, including myself, are feeling weary about this implementation, which seems like a foray into P2W mechanics...but all I'm asking is that we wait and give the new system atleast a week before we brandish our pitchforks?
tl;dr
Calm. Down. Give. It. A. Try. Before. You. Rage.
Thanks
#2
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:07 PM
#3
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:08 PM
I don't support MC consumables.
#4
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:10 PM
If this forum hadn't lost its **** when it was announced the Jenner would get ECM do you think it would have been retroactively removed? Considering they've basically not touched the core functions of the thing since release? Yea....
#5
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:11 PM
#7
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:12 PM
Windies, on 04 March 2013 - 07:11 PM, said:
It's an easy solution
They say "our bad, this was dumb" and scrap the whole thing.
Problem solved, everyone goes home happy.
#8
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:13 PM
p8ragon, on 04 March 2013 - 07:06 PM, said:
For Christ' sake, every other thread is I HATE P2W GG PGI I'M GONNA QUIT...you guys haven't even TRIED it yet.
I realize that the MC version is directly better (by one module slot), but honestly, let's just see how it plays out first?
I do realize why many people, including myself, are feeling weary about this implementation, which seems like a foray into P2W mechanics...but all I'm asking is that we wait and give the new system atleast a week before we brandish our pitchforks?
tl;dr
Calm. Down. Give. It. A. Try. Before. You. Rage.
Thanks
But see, the mere fact that you can say "I realize the MC version is directly better" means that there's something very, very wrong with what they're doing. The degree to which the paid version is better is largely irrelevant (especially considering the fact that we have no reason to assume that other consumables won't follow the same road, in which case the small advantages would simply continue to stack).
#10
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:13 PM
By "gold ammo territory", I mean a thing that is technically available for free, but too grindy to be worth using.
Of course, the item would also have to be pretty darn good as well for that to be the case. I'm not sure coolant pods qualify, we don't know yet.
Bottom line: I'm not worried. Maybe a little skeptical, maybe a little disappointed in PGI decision making again, but not worried. We shall see soon enough.
Edited by Warrax the Chaos Warrior, 04 March 2013 - 07:15 PM.
#12
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:14 PM
p8ragon, on 04 March 2013 - 07:06 PM, said:
For Christ' sake, every other thread is I HATE P2W GG PGI I'M GONNA QUIT...you guys haven't even TRIED it yet.
I realize that the MC version is directly better (by one module slot), but honestly, let's just see how it plays out first?
I do realize why many people, including myself, are feeling weary about this implementation, which seems like a foray into P2W mechanics...but all I'm asking is that we wait and give the new system atleast a week before we brandish our pitchforks?
tl;dr
Calm. Down. Give. It. A. Try. Before. You. Rage.
Thanks
Are you one of the people that said this about ECM too?
I'll bet you were.
All I'm gonna say is, told you so.
#13
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:18 PM
Fate 6, on 04 March 2013 - 07:14 PM, said:
I'll bet you were.
All I'm gonna say is, told you so.
hahahah i wasn't even active on the forums when the whole ECM thing came into play. I think it's fine though...so long as they fix the matchmaking to ensure that both teams have atleast one ecm mech.
#14
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:20 PM
#15
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:20 PM
#16
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:25 PM
Say I want to use only 1 coolant flush in a game, well, the MC coolant flush is clearly superior. I can use 1 module slot for a 20% C-Bill flush, or 1 module slot for a 35% MC flush. Complete no brainer here on which is better.
Say i want to use 2 coolant flushes in a game (or air strike, or artillery strike), then the C-Bill option is by far the superior option. Why? An MC consumable CAN'T be stacked, so the ONLY way to get multiple uses is to go with the C-Bill option.
So long as the C-Bill option isn't prohibitively expensive, then I just don't see a problem here. MC is superior if you want to only be able to use an option once in a battle, C-Bills are superior for multi-use. I don't know about you guys, but I'll probably want to be able to use my consumable more then once....especially if it allows me to drop explosive ordinance on someones head.
#17
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:27 PM
N0MAD, on 04 March 2013 - 07:20 PM, said:
This, exactly. I quit World of Tanks. Not buying pay2win ammo. I'm not buying pay2win coolant. And I will not support a developer that uses that BS.
#18
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:28 PM
N0MAD, on 04 March 2013 - 07:20 PM, said:
But we don't know that until the actual item comes out tomorrow.
Honestly, i don't think the vast majority of the MWO population even USES modules. Most people whom are active on the forums are veteran or competitive players. The average player probably doesn't even use a single module, much less two.
In that sense I can understand why many forum members are so outraged. It is higher level play which will be affected by this implementation...however, i think everyday matches for average players such as myself won't change.
#19
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:28 PM
#20
Posted 04 March 2013 - 07:29 PM
3 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 3 guests, 0 anonymous users