

Show Your Support
#61
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:11 PM
PGI gets money from us.
PGI has to pay IGP regularly for the original investment startup funding.
IGP is using some of their recent proceeds to prop up other games.
These are all facts. Whether or not we can add in:
PGI took MWO proceeds and gave it to Mechwarrior Tactics
is an opinion and cannot be directly proven or disproven. You two don't agree, fine. It doesn't matter anyway. No one is forcing anyone to spend more regardless of the reason for refusal.
#62
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:12 PM
#63
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:12 PM
#64
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:13 PM
Shumabot, on 08 March 2013 - 12:56 PM, said:
If they were being used as such it would be our concern. Founders Program was to help develop MWO. Hey look... MWO! Mechwarrior Tactics is done by a different development team that doesn't get ANY of PGI's money they made off of the Founder's program except maybe filtered indirectly through IGP taking it's cut of PGI's profits from being the publishing company and then investing in another project.
#65
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:15 PM
Shumabot, on 08 March 2013 - 01:07 PM, said:
You're really, really, really bad at not sounding like you're making everything you say up on the spot. Try not contradicting yourself in literally every other post. You have directly contradicted yourself twice in a row.
That is unless you actually DO have secret information about the cash flow between these companies. Do you? If not you should probably stop posting.
Your right. At this time my thoughts are incomplete and not translating well to text at this time. However I agree with the post above. This is pointless and I need to move on.
#66
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:17 PM
Vermaxx, on 08 March 2013 - 01:11 PM, said:
PGI gets money from us.
PGI has to pay IGP regularly for the original investment startup funding.
IGP is using some of their recent proceeds to prop up other games.
These are all facts. Whether or not we can add in:
PGI took MWO proceeds and gave it to Mechwarrior Tactics
That's not actually how studio/publisher relationships generally work. IGP wasn't an angel investor, and it's highly unlikely they're treating this like a car loan.
#67
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:18 PM
PropagandaWar, on 08 March 2013 - 12:55 PM, said:
Last few days Ive seen your name pop up. Its always negative. Go troll elswhere unless you have something constructive to say.
Edited by Yoseful Mallad, 08 March 2013 - 01:19 PM.
#68
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:21 PM
Mercules, on 08 March 2013 - 01:13 PM, said:
If they were being used as such it would be our concern. Founders Program was to help develop MWO. Hey look... MWO! Mechwarrior Tactics is done by a different development team that doesn't get ANY of PGI's money they made off of the Founder's program except maybe filtered indirectly through IGP taking it's cut of PGI's profits from being the publishing company and then investing in another project.
Why do you think that's how their contract works? That's not how these contracts ever work, and the founders program was likely contractually split well before the public ever heard about it. They certainly haven't taken that money to get staff or equipment, they already had both and haven't improved either.
Where do you think that moneys going.
Edited by Shumabot, 08 March 2013 - 01:22 PM.
#69
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:26 PM
Shumabot, on 08 March 2013 - 01:21 PM, said:
To the publisher as their cut of the profits, just like I said. What the publisher does beyond that is not PGI's fault. Once it is on IGP's books then it is theirs to do with. That doesn't mean the portion PGI gets is not invested by PGI for PGI. That doesn't mean my founders money didn't get used for it's purposes which was development of MWO. It means IGP then took their cut and invested it elsewhere.
Now, if I give money to PGI and NOT Roadhouse where do you think IGP will reinvest? Where people are putting in money. So even if half my money is going to IGP and used to start up another project it still makes PGI lucrative and look better to their publisher so that the game continues.
#70
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:28 PM
Mercules, on 08 March 2013 - 01:26 PM, said:
To the publisher as their cut of the profits, just like I said. What the publisher does beyond that is not PGI's fault. Once it is on IGP's books then it is theirs to do with. That doesn't mean the portion PGI gets is not invested by PGI for PGI. That doesn't mean my founders money didn't get used for it's purposes which was development of MWO. It means IGP then took their cut and invested it elsewhere.
Now, if I give money to PGI and NOT Roadhouse where do you think IGP will reinvest? Where people are putting in money. So even if half my money is going to IGP and used to start up another project it still makes PGI lucrative and look better to their publisher so that the game continues.
Why do you think they'd do that? You're assuming altruism in business, and that's foolish. IGP has every incentive to take from paul to give to peter so that both revenue streams can become active as soon as possible. Stop presuming there are ethics in the interactive entertainment business. There aren't.
There has been no visible efficacy in the founders money for PGI. No one has been hired, they haven't improved the servers, they already had all of their equipment. If that money has been spent it's been spent on lavish office furniture, it sure as hell hasn't gone to getting more personnel to increase the rate of development (which is still incredibly sluggish).
Edited by Shumabot, 08 March 2013 - 01:31 PM.
#71
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:34 PM
Shumabot, on 08 March 2013 - 01:28 PM, said:
Why do you think they'd do that? You're assuming altruism in business, and that's foolish. IGP has every incentive to take from paul to give to peter so that both revenue streams can become active as soon as possible. Stop presuming there are ethics in the interactive entertainment business. There aren't.
There has been no visible efficacy in the founders money for PGI. No one has been hired, they haven't improved the servers, they already had all of their equipment. If that money has been spent it's been spent on lavish office furniture, it sure as hell hasn't gone to getting more personnel.
Wow... you have their accounting books? You think existing payroll is free? I'm sure renting an office space and T3 trunks is free.
For someone who "understands" business you don't seem to understand operation costs.
As for IGP I know my company doesn't continue projects that don't make money. I would assume any successful business would have a similar model. "Oh, we have sold 4 subscriptions in the last month? We should dump some more money into it. That will bring more subscribers." NOT.
#72
Posted 08 March 2013 - 01:54 PM
#73
Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:23 PM
Vermaxx, on 08 March 2013 - 12:49 PM, said:
Unless you tell me you didn't ever use your premium time...in which case I need to go away because fork trying to grind several mech lines' worth of XP without premium.
I don't give a crap about aesthetics. Not in game, not in real life. I don't wash my car, cause it offers no real benefit other than making it look nicer and it doesn't snow here, so no salt to wash off. Same thing with mech paint jobs. I don't care what it looks like, color wise. Plus, I can't even see it during a match. I'm just like you but in reverse, I don't believe someone could care about such trivial stuff and even pay money for it.
And yeah, maybe you should go away cause I haven't activated my time yet. (kidding, not meant to be mean) I'm still thinking of ebaying my account because I don't like how the game has progressed since beta went open. It will go for more on ebay with full founders MC and time.
As far as the grind without founders time, playing matches is a grind I am ok with, since I am going to be doing that anyway. yeah it takes a lot longer, but I'm not in any epeen battles, so I don't care. I play to have fun. Plus, it would be a waste since I don't play much nowadays.
#74
Posted 08 March 2013 - 02:25 PM
Common really?
#75
Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:07 PM
I have barely played another game in that time. At store prices here in Aus that would equate to about 2 top shelf console games or the PC equivalent. Those games might last me 2 or 3 weeks. I would contend that MWO has actually saved me money since I usually bought a new game every 6-8 weeks. I bought Civilisation 5, 2 days before I got into closed Beta and have played it about 5 times since, that was wasted money.
My MC spends so far have been on Mechbays, a few mechs early on, Unit paints (3000) but by far I spend the most on xp conversions so I don't have to spend time playing garbage chassis just so I can level up the one I like.
I will carefully spend what I have left until CW gets here and PGI stop wasting resourses on stuff they said they would never bring in (Coolant Pod, 3rd person etc) and get the game they promised out to us. I have still to activate my founders premium time.
BTW the argument over MW Tactics and funding is probably more complicated than anyone knows. There are at least 2 employees that I can think of that are working on both projects, this indicates that at the very least they are sharing resources.
#76
Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:32 PM
#77
Posted 08 March 2013 - 03:46 PM
Edited by BumbleBee, 08 March 2013 - 03:48 PM.
#78
Posted 08 March 2013 - 04:40 PM
Shumabot, on 08 March 2013 - 12:56 PM, said:
I'd say its the business of any founder if the funds are being used in an unethical fashion that goes against the stated intention of the founders program.
You're bad at propaganda, you just sound like a child. In one post you are absolutely certain that the money isn't going to MW:T, in the next you say no one could possibly know that and it's not our business. Shifting sands much?
in that case, tell us where the money trail leads? Otherwise......
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users