Phaesphoros, on 15 March 2013 - 06:03 AM, said:
Please don't take this personally. This is just how science works (you cannot prove anything, only falsify). It's just there are so many events, hard to distinguish, in this video.
I don't even deny there is an issue. I just claim you cannot prove or show it clearly with this video.
I am shooting an 80 damage alpha. The atlas takes negligible damage to any location other than its CT (the left torso goes from orange to red, but that is it).
The 2 awesomes were 9Ms using a total of 6SRM4s which is 60 dmg. Given the lack of much spread damage taken by the Atlas these missiles would have been sufficient to take the CT from Orange armor to Orange Internal. My 80 damage alpha did not register as a hit per hit indicator, nor did it land on the CT of the atlas ( the volleys just before mine would have to hit somewhere but the atlas paperdoll certainly did not indicate 60 damage from the Awesome volleys anywhere except the CT), nor did it land anywhere else, as it would have surely done more damage to the atlas' armor than what was indicated.
I most certainly did not miss, and the atlas backing away from me did not have the required time to move. it would have taken several seconds for it to get up the hill far enough for the missiles to not in the very least strike its legs (which the paperdoll does not indicate that as happening).
Therefore the only conclusion is the Awesomes missed the entire mech (unlikely given explosion placement and range) and my hit indicator failed to register a hit which spread very little of the damage to any location, or my volley did no damage.
Occam's razor clearly points to my volley doing no damage as the logical culprit.
Before the volleys paperdoll
After volley paperdoll
You can see the atlas only took slight damage to the head, CT, and Left torso. Any other damage was negligible.
Edited by 3rdworld, 15 March 2013 - 06:54 AM.