End Of Beta Assault. What Will It Be?
#101
Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:26 PM
#102
Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:35 PM
I'd like it to be an Annihilator. The flea shows they are considering wolfs dragoons mechs though... so I'll hold out hope....
#103
Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:40 PM
#104
Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:47 PM
Belorion, on 16 March 2013 - 04:40 PM, said:
nope, but I think it if a good number to have 5 mechs of each weight class.
Also it does not feel like they are pushing out any new concept art (including mech 20)
#105
Posted 16 March 2013 - 04:50 PM
TungstenWall, on 16 March 2013 - 04:47 PM, said:
Also it does not feel like they are pushing out any new concept art (including mech 20)
They will eventually, but not anytime soon. They still have 4 months of mechs after the JagerMech is released Tuesday.
#106
Posted 16 March 2013 - 05:22 PM
Belorion, on 16 March 2013 - 04:50 PM, said:
They will eventually, but not anytime soon. They still have 4 months of mechs after the JagerMech is released Tuesday.
True.
Still, 5 is a nice round number. "Choose from 20 mechs, and more to come" sounds cool for a Commercial on youtube/TV tho.
+ rumor is they will give the laser buff to ballistics by the time the Highlander comes out, and collisions soon after the highlander (for DfA.) Then the final 4 mechs could be devoted to more 12v12 improvements/maps, better garage UI, and polish.
But yeah its just a guess
#107
Posted 16 March 2013 - 05:35 PM
#108
Posted 16 March 2013 - 05:39 PM
#109
Posted 16 March 2013 - 05:51 PM
My #1 'want' choice is the annihilator. It is, in my opinion a pretty iconic assault mech, and I would be able to point it out and name it in a lineup before any of the other mechs in this list.
I'm personally expecting the Zeus to be next however. I'm pretty sure it's been mentioned several times in past news updates and the like, I don't remember a single word about any of the others on the list.
#110
Posted 16 March 2013 - 06:02 PM
#112
Posted 16 March 2013 - 07:15 PM
#113
Posted 16 March 2013 - 07:26 PM
Rickrom, on 16 March 2013 - 07:15 PM, said:
Huh. Right era for a devastator, it has three variants, it hasn't really been featured in a MW game before, carrying an energy and ballistic load-out that we don't really see in any current assault (unless you count the -RS)... that might actually be different enough from what we have, with enough of a compatible nature, to be what they go with!
I'm excited about that possibility now! I want to change my vote to Devastator!
Or King Crab, although that uses a build rule that they don't allow in MWO right now. (it crit-splits the AC20's in the arms between said arms and the side torsos).
#114
Posted 16 March 2013 - 07:38 PM
TheMadTypist, on 16 March 2013 - 07:26 PM, said:
Huh. Right era for a devastator, it has three variants, it hasn't really been featured in a MW game before, carrying an energy and ballistic load-out that we don't really see in any current assault (unless you count the -RS)... that might actually be different enough from what we have, with enough of a compatible nature, to be what they go with!
I'm excited about that possibility now! I want to change my vote to Devastator!
Huh. Yeah. maybe so.
Edited by Cferre, 16 March 2013 - 07:39 PM.
#115
Posted 16 March 2013 - 08:06 PM
That said, I wonder why there are no 55 tonners announced yet?
#116
Posted 16 March 2013 - 08:30 PM
Zeus would be nice, but it's far too similar to the Awesome to bring a lot of variety on it's own.
I always found the Victor to be a disappointment, honestly, and the rest I wouldn't applaud or mind either way.
#117
Posted 16 March 2013 - 08:32 PM
Being of the purple eagle, I'd love a Wolverine just to pilot a WVR-6M, but alas...
#119
Posted 17 March 2013 - 03:11 AM
PGI so far has only picked mechs that are in production among the Successor States (and yes, this includes SLDF mechs like the Highlander because it's been in production again since the mid 3030's).
#120
Posted 17 March 2013 - 03:18 AM
...
What do you mean, it's not an Assault?
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users