144 replies to this topic

[Sable Dove]

No effort to balance the most broken aspects of the game;
nerfs to chassis that are powerful because of broken weapons (or to a chassis that has one variant that is powerful, and still is);
Blatant P2W implemented - no shame evident;
no significant bugfixes;
implemented many largely pointless (and apparently bugged) control changes - overwrite keybindings, lacks understanding of the term 'toggle.'


I was hoping to get some new mechbays (master my Hunchbacks finally; maybe try a new chassis or two), and maybe some paints (when there's a sale; prices are OP). Like the look of the Dogtag cockpit item too.
Can't justify giving PGI money when every patch hurts the game overall. Especially when they're clearly moving the game towards a pay-to-win model.

Not that I expect this to stir great change, but hopefully it lets PGI know that some people are discouraged from giving them money when they don't make any progress on the balance front, and when they shift more towards P2W.

[Tennex]

YAY HIGHLANDEr.

[MonkeyCheese]

QQ more

[Fenris Krinkovich]

Stop with the P2W. Cool Shot 18 and Cool Shot 9x9 are exactly the same. One costs your so-valuable time playing the game, one costs less than a DIME. Not even that, it's like eight cents if you buy the smallest MC package. If eight cents is what's between you and winning, I just don't know what to tell you. ******* freeloader.

[Chavette]

Two weeks? More like one month

[Chris Morris]

I disagree on nearly all your points. I hope you find what you are looking for in a game however.

[Sable Dove]

Fenris Krinkovich, on 19 March 2013 - 04:20 PM, said:

******* freeloader.

Love this mentality. If they want an open beta so they don't have to pay for a QA department, why would I pay them? In fact, I stated I would be willing to give them money if they stopped making the game worse, and maybe even made it a little better.

If you make a free-to-play game supported by micro-transactions, and either fail to produce content worth paying for, or screw up the game so badly that even the things that should be worth the price aren't justifiable, then why should you get money? The players are basically working for PGI, and not only does PGI routinely ignore them, but also lie to them.

Are you seriously suggesting that people should pay to help someone? Anyone who volunteers their time to try and improve something is a freeloader? Okay.

[Felicitatem Parco]

This thread is going straight to Kaetetoa where it can be discussed, as it is not constructive.

[octatonic]

I paid for the coolant flush but I did not win what gives PGI please fix this immediately. Also where are the new trial mechs this is a heinous crime and I am very upset in real life right now.

[Commander Kobold]

How many times will I have to repeat this? If you have the basic unlocks for the A1 C1 or C4 the "nerfs" are non existant the only chassis that has a noticeable change is the k2 and even then it's not that bad.

[octatonic]

But the numbers are smaller therefor they are ruined forever. What now mister Omni thirteen?

[Ter Ushaka]

octatonic, on 19 March 2013 - 04:40 PM, said:

I paid for the coolant flush but I did not win what gives PGI please fix this immediately. Also where are the new trial mechs this is a heinous crime and I am very upset in real life right now.

I agree, I have not won any games since purchasing these Pay 2 Win mechs with MC. I demand a full refund and a video apology by Russ posted onto Youtube, delivered while he wears a plunger on his head. I paid for your games, I pay your salaries. Listen to your customers, I am your customer therefore I am always right, DO YOU UNDERSTAND?

[Ryvucz]

Hi thread.

[Agent of Change]

[Voridan Atreides]

FU?

[Agent of Change]

Indeed

[Voridan Atreides]

Interesting. Sounds like a wonderful place.

[Agent of Change]

I feel like

many of the posters

in GD

failed to get degrees there.

[Voridan Atreides]

GD is FU.

[Agent of Change]

Hmm

you may be

on to something there