Jump to content

Community Warfare?


9 replies to this topic

#1 Xandergod

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 145 posts
  • LocationIllinois

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:26 PM

We the people, participants of the MWO beta and fans of the Battletech franchise. Hereby demand answers regarding the future of Mechwarrior online.

This goes directly to the Devs and Upper management in PGI. There was a statement made about the future of this game. It wasn't even a press release. Furthermore, no statement was even posted to the OFFICIAL forums. Personally, I find it offensive that such news wouldn't get official mention in the forums. I find it even more offensive that such statements would be made and not elaborated on in the forums.

Forum participants may not be the bulk of your player base, but we are the most vocal. To make such an announcement without engaging the community at all, shows a complete lack of respect for the people who arguably love your game the most.

It is quite obvious that plans are in place. These plans will directly impact my participation in this game post beta. I believe everyone who plays wants some answers. I want to know if I should quit today, rather than waste my time participating in something that will be of no interest later.

#2 Carrioncrows

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 2,949 posts

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:27 PM

What's this we stuff?

I'll wait until I have something in had before I ***** about it.

Edited by Carrioncrows, 30 March 2013 - 05:28 PM.


#3 Xandergod

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 145 posts
  • LocationIllinois

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:29 PM

View PostCarrioncrows, on 30 March 2013 - 05:27 PM, said:

What's this we stuff?

I'll wait until I have something in had before I ***** about it.

Why don't we have information yet. That is the point of the forum post. This information was already made public. Shouldn't an official response be included?

Edited by LexLuther, 30 March 2013 - 05:30 PM.


#4 Krazy Kat

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 696 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:30 PM

Dude there is already a forum post with 88 pages already on this subject. Don't start another one.

#5 Xandergod

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 145 posts
  • LocationIllinois

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:32 PM

View PostKrazy Kat, on 30 March 2013 - 05:30 PM, said:

Dude there is already a forum post with 88 pages already on this subject. Don't start another one.

I know about the other post. I've read many pages of it. It says the official response will come when people get back from holiday. I'm saying that is rude.

#6 Moromillas

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 943 posts
  • LocationSecret **** moon base

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:35 PM

Somewhat valid points, but it needs to go in the main discussion.

This is about the game being pay to play for mercs and clans, aff?

#7 Carrioncrows

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Rage
  • Rage
  • 2,949 posts

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:38 PM

View PostLexLuther, on 30 March 2013 - 05:29 PM, said:

Why don't we have information yet. That is the point of the forum post. This information was already made public. Shouldn't an official response be included?


Out of all the gaming companies and communities I have been associated with PGI is by far the best at communication and giving us a road map for future content.

Some companies are just a media blackout

If they take the option to play their cards close to their chest, good on them. Because between now and then the Community warfare could change a hundred times in a hundred different ways.

I am fine with them getting it right, and sometimes getting it right is not a democratic vote open to suggestions.

Let the man work.

#8 El Death Smurf

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 362 posts
  • LocationIdaho

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:40 PM

this one's for you lex.
http://youtu.be/eGQEAiZJMco

you self entitled bass

Edited by El Death Smurf, 30 March 2013 - 05:41 PM.


#9 Moromillas

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 943 posts
  • LocationSecret **** moon base

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:45 PM

View PostBuddahcjcc, on 30 March 2013 - 05:38 PM, said:

The answer to your question is theyve done a 180 on their stance with that idea, and are blaming the whole thing on a "miscommunication" by the author of the piece. The author has tweeted that he did the interview from quotes so theres nothing really to get wrong.
The author is attempting to contact PGI to see what they think is wrong about the article.

Do you still have it in a tab?

#10 Egomane

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 8,163 posts

Posted 30 March 2013 - 05:47 PM

View PostLexLuther, on 30 March 2013 - 05:32 PM, said:

It says the official response will come when people get back from holiday. I'm saying that is rude.


No reason to open up another thread about it. You'll have to be patient, just like the rest of us.

This thread is now closed, just like all the others.





5 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 5 guests, 0 anonymous users