Gremlich Johns, on 03 June 2012 - 11:58 AM, said:
$60 is not that much of a gamble, considering what we have already seen. It's not like it is a Kickstarter experiment, now, is it.
I guess that statement strikes me as over-trivializing.
Well, it's the biggest gamble you can make in games, it's the highest price going.
People that don't really know the odds or the payoff usually don't gamble.
Funny, I spent decades not having to gamble and it worked real well, the best developers were usually keen on showing off demos of the quality of their work and earning customers, well, when quality came before gambling.
Quote
How many of us know a guy who plunked down $60 plus tax for a game only to find out he did not care for it and said "Oh, well>" and moved on to the next game.
With only so much pie, the quality developers that really have the minds, talent, drive, skill, that eat, sleep, breath it for years are not compensated appropriately, under your system. That is why gaming has become a joke on what is selling, more people buying lies everyday, and more people are ok with it too. It's always easier to manipulate and lie to people, it goes farther in the systems of today.
Edited by MadBoris, 03 June 2012 - 12:12 PM.