Champion Mechs Are Laughable!
#41
Posted 15 April 2013 - 08:52 PM
#42
Posted 15 April 2013 - 08:52 PM
Yoseful Mallad, on 15 April 2013 - 06:24 PM, said:
Um... LOL!!! Ill pass!! I can build the same mech with C-Bills and the 5% extra XP boost I can live without. Taking someone's custom mech build slapping a 5% XP boost on it and calling it a Champion mech is laughable!!
If this is your only way to come up with Champion mechs... I'm really worried lol.
I admit. A little... bland.
But think of it this way: there're plenty of folks who will shell out to support the game and just straight buy a mech for MC. That's how PGI supports this thing in the first place. Now those folks will get the chance to buy those mechs with a 5% xp boost and the title 'champion.'
And really, every month or two I will go spend a little money on MWO--I was around in closed beta, but wasn't sure I'd stick with the game and didn't want to commit to founder's. Now I think I like playing, and that just as a gesture of thanks and to satisfy my own desire for instant gratification (thanks, American culture) I'll MC a mech every once in a while. I know that if I should want a model and they have a 'champion' or 'regular' version, I'll probably pick the champion.
No, it doesn't really change the decision of 'will I buy or not,' I'm still going to shell out a little every once in a while out of sheer thanks. But I consider it a nice little gesture from the devs to give me more options.
So... Thanks!
#43
Posted 15 April 2013 - 08:54 PM
#44
Posted 15 April 2013 - 08:55 PM
Koniving, on 15 April 2013 - 06:26 PM, said:
http://mwomercs.com/...ost__p__2205477
They told me I clued in super late.
MWO: Twitch.tv Action Apr. 2, 2013
21:20
It's Russ's voice.
#45
Posted 16 April 2013 - 03:20 AM
OneEyed Jack, on 15 April 2013 - 08:26 PM, said:
#46
Posted 16 April 2013 - 03:57 AM
DanNashe, on 15 April 2013 - 06:58 PM, said:
Secondly, my understanding is they had a great idea for a competition.
It went really well but PGI outright said "man guys, this took a LOT of time and effort on our part to compile results. This is cool, but it's not worth developer time."
So I suspect after they did all this, some guy said "hey, you know what might make this kind of thing worth our time in the future . . . ". So probably not an evil conspiracy.
Even if it was, so what? Would I have voted differently? Sure.
Am I hurt by it? No.
Back on the main point:
Would I buy it for MC for 5% exp boost when I prefer the 1C variant which can run similar weapons? Of course not.
Would I pay 2,000 MC for even a 1C variant with 5% more exp? No.
But will other people? I don't know.
If 2 of them sell, obviously, the rewards aren't worth it.
If 500 of them sell, PGI made a good money making decision.
Given how the coding works, I bet it took one guy very l ittle time to create Champion mechs (by create I mean add in code that says "if you play this mech, you get 5% more exp!", not the whole competition thing).
If they don't sell at all, they've delayed a feature I want by 1/2 a day at most, for nothing.
It won't hurt my game play at all. I can just not buy it.
IF they sell 10,000 of them, it won't hurt me at all, because I can buy an identical mech with C-Bills and just play 5% more games on mine.
But it will help me, because that's potentially $100,000 - the cost of a new chassis!
So why the *anger*?
It will be desirable, or it won't.
If it's not desirable, they'll increase the bonus or they will not introduce any more champion mechs.
Either way, it hurts no one.
And yeah, actually, when I started, I bought mechs with MC.
Why? Because I was willing to pay $30 bucks to support the game, And that got me 5 mechbays and 2 mechs.
So the day after I Finished my 25 games I had 3 different mechs I could play.
In contrast, I could have spent that money on one hero mech and nothing else.
IT could also depend on price point.
IF champion mechs are 1250 or lower, that's $8 to save myself 60 games.
That's 10 hours of my life.
Yeah, sometimes 10 hours of my life is worth $8.
(Why? Because maybe I have 10,000 exp on the trial mech and just want to play a dragon!)
In fact, here's a novel idea.
You said it is dumb to buy c-bill mechs with MC.
Let's say your right.
Let's say a mech costs 5 million cbills (2000 MC).
No one would pay MC if they're smart (according to you).
But let's say for 2000 MC I get the same mech AND a 5% exp bonus.
Now suddenly, it is looking a lot more tempting because the eXP bonus is a free perq for spending MC. In other words, suddenly there's at least a small reason to buy these variants with MC.
Best of all, it's not pay to win at all! Not even *potentially* P2W like hero mechs could be if they accidentally introduced one that was the best in chassis. The more money PGI makes on things like that, the better this game will be for all of us.
I'm just saying, why the hostility, man? Take a chill pill and relax!
Actually bad decisions do leave scars, don't think for a moment when running a buisness that you can do what ever experiment you like and not get feedback. Cause and affect, silly ideas then loss of public confidence. PGI makes a lot of these and in return people think about their buisness like this...
FrOdO, on 15 April 2013 - 07:04 PM, said:
You see, we are the ones being hurt because our devs are looking foolish for the whole world to see. Staining the game's rep and making it less likely for a good outcome for this titles future. It all adds up, people do remember. This BS idea of a mc purchasable mech ontop of mc consumables, 3rdperson, more bugs than ever and the cw that is hushed for months then suddenly has a deadline on a plateform that's as unfinished as this one is... you see where the decisions are taking their toll. Don't you?
#47
Posted 16 April 2013 - 04:23 AM
by letting the community offer designs you get viable and solid builds. By then offering them as trial mechs you let average casual user try it for free and then you offer it up to them for a modest fee ready to go. they do not need to tinker with anything and still get to feel like they have a good mech with some added value thanks to the xp boost.
So it is a win/win/win situation. PGI get the community involved, we all get less aweful triamechs and the average casual player can oen a good mech that is hassle free without it affecting the "leet" crowd AT ALL. =)
These mechs are not aimed at the advanced user but the casual, fairly uninitiated player that will/does make up the majority of the game.
Edited by AlexEss, 16 April 2013 - 04:24 AM.
#48
Posted 16 April 2013 - 04:30 AM
bigdaddynash, on 16 April 2013 - 03:57 AM, said:
Actually bad decisions do leave scars, don't think for a moment when running a buisness that you can do what ever experiment you like and not get feedback. Cause and affect, silly ideas then loss of public confidence. PGI makes a lot of these and in return people think about their buisness like this...
You see, we are the ones being hurt because our devs are looking foolish for the whole world to see. Staining the game's rep and making it less likely for a good outcome for this titles future. It all adds up, people do remember. This BS idea of a mc purchasable mech ontop of mc consumables, 3rdperson, more bugs than ever and the cw that is hushed for months then suddenly has a deadline on a plateform that's as unfinished as this one is... you see where the decisions are taking their toll. Don't you?
Yeah, all of this.
#49
Posted 16 April 2013 - 04:46 AM
OneEyed Jack, on 15 April 2013 - 08:26 PM, said:
You do realize that the 'lower MC price point' obviously is compared to Hero Mechs (mentioned in the beginning of the paragraph) that are a lot more expensive than standard variants. The champion will not be cheaper than a regular 5N.
Edit:
I'm personally disappointed because I thought there would be a new cool thing to buy. If and when this doesn't even look different than the regular 5N, I'd be paying money just for the letter C in parentheses. That's just not cool enough.
I would've likely bought it even if they just added a small hat on it. Everything is better with hats. But no. No hats.
Edited by Kyynele, 16 April 2013 - 04:52 AM.
#50
Posted 16 April 2013 - 04:47 AM
Yoseful Mallad, on 16 April 2013 - 03:20 AM, said:
What is worth what for other people is not for you to decide.
#51
Posted 16 April 2013 - 04:56 AM
Somebody wins a community contest, and their design gets a 5% XP bonus, a new classification, and in the game after what was probably three hours tops of a developer's actual work time after the decision was made. No real resource expenditure on PGI's part (aside from wading through the original contest), and the community gets an outlet to start pumping competitively modified designs straight into the cash shop. ...apparently, this is grounds for calling PGI names again. Jeebus. These guys just can't win around here.
If you don't like it, don't buy it. If you do like it, there you go. This isn't the sort of decision that should be raising a ruckus, folks. Come on, there are so many other things you all could be harping on PGI and threatening to LEAVE AND NEVER COME BACK(!!!) over. if you're going to be unreasonable reactionaries (again), at least pick something worth reacting to, eh?
#52
Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:12 AM
#54
Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:17 AM
Team Leader, on 15 April 2013 - 06:33 PM, said:
People buy the regular chassis for MC, why would this one be any different? It's less money than the N variant, so it makes more sense for people to buy this one than the N.
#55
Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:19 AM
Edited by Viper69, 16 April 2013 - 05:20 AM.
#56
Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:27 AM
But one thing has to be said and that is PERSON who is original designer of that mech should get his Dragon or whatever mech championed by PGI or get one for free. If they want to seel stuff from comunity. It will dont cost them anything its just digitali produced goodies which prob that person wouldnt buy anyway just to get his chassis champ status. But it would be nice thank you from PGI.
If they are people who will buy them lets give them blast maybe we will see some more content added into game faster:P.
Edited by JuiceKeeper, 16 April 2013 - 05:29 AM.
#57
Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:30 AM
I never, ever use my 5N.
A 1C or a 1N would have been a better choice. In fact, I see zero reason why it wasn't a 1N instead. 1Ns are solid mechs.
Edited by Mister Blastman, 16 April 2013 - 05:34 AM.
#58
Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:31 AM
Yoseful Mallad, on 16 April 2013 - 03:20 AM, said:
I understand what you're saying perfectly. You're saying that Champions are not worth it, largely because they cost twice as much as the regular, and I'm pointing out that, according to the Creative Director Update, they don't. They are, in point of fact, cheaper. Therefore, your reading comprehension is **** and your entire blowhard argument is the same.
Kyynele, on 16 April 2013 - 04:46 AM, said:
It's obviously compared to the Hero mechs that are mentioned absolutely nowhere in the paragraph? Again, I bring up reading comprehension. You do realize that Hero (which can be bought for
#59
Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:36 AM
Yoseful Mallad, on 15 April 2013 - 06:42 PM, said:
And now even if new players liked it and wanted it because they got to use it as a trial mech, they can't use it anymore unless they buy it with real money? LMAO!!! Come on PGI... Stop it!
oh...
I hadn't thought of that. Perhaps it will remain a trial variant without the boost? If not, that's pretty messed up, funny and sad all at the same time.
#60
Posted 16 April 2013 - 05:39 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
























