Oloccorb, on 17 April 2013 - 02:27 PM, said:
They never stated
it was never
going to make it
into the game.
They just stated
it was a
lower priority.
Posted 17 April 2013 - 03:36 PM
Oloccorb, on 17 April 2013 - 02:27 PM, said:
They never stated
it was never
going to make it
into the game.
They just stated
it was a
lower priority.
Posted 17 April 2013 - 04:02 PM
Edited by AnubiteGroove, 17 April 2013 - 04:03 PM.
Posted 17 April 2013 - 04:03 PM
AnubiteGroove, on 17 April 2013 - 04:02 PM, said:
Show me
where I took
a dump?
If you
find what
I have to say
so distasteful,
take a look
at my sig
and fix it
yourself.
My formatting
is allowed.
Deal with it.
Posted 17 April 2013 - 04:53 PM
Willie Sauerland, on 17 April 2013 - 03:36 PM, said:
They never stated
it was never
going to make it
into the game.
They just stated
it was a
lower priority.
Posted 17 April 2013 - 05:07 PM
Posted 17 April 2013 - 05:17 PM
Posted 17 April 2013 - 05:43 PM
Dakkaface, on 17 April 2013 - 01:30 PM, said:
Posted 17 April 2013 - 05:48 PM
jeffsw6, on 17 April 2013 - 05:43 PM, said:
Well written and accurate.
The problem is,
does PGIGP
have enough staff
to actually implement this?
Do they have
enough staff
to support it?
That could be a
part of the problem
as well...
Posted 17 April 2013 - 05:50 PM
AnubiteGroove, on 17 April 2013 - 04:02 PM, said:
Edited by Team Leader, 17 April 2013 - 05:50 PM.
Posted 17 April 2013 - 05:53 PM
Team Leader, on 17 April 2013 - 05:50 PM, said:
I see.
By "interesting"
and "construction"
it must mean
I don't agree with you.
I'm ok with that.
Most,
it seems,
can't handle it.

Posted 17 April 2013 - 05:55 PM
Black Templar, on 17 April 2013 - 01:16 PM, said:
Posted 17 April 2013 - 06:01 PM
Team Leader, on 17 April 2013 - 05:58 PM, said:
I don't disagree.
At all.
But,
will we get it?
Not for a while.
This to me
is the very sad
truth.
By the way,
I am not going
to make the
judgement call
whether the decision
is right or wrong.
Somewhere,
I have to trust
PGI is making
the best decisions
for their strategy.
Either they will
make it
or
fail.
I have no control
over this at all.
Posted 17 April 2013 - 06:03 PM
Koniving, on 17 April 2013 - 01:26 PM, said:
Posted 17 April 2013 - 06:03 PM
Posted 17 April 2013 - 06:57 PM
Posted 17 April 2013 - 06:58 PM
Willie Sauerland, on 17 April 2013 - 01:21 PM, said:
It is a low priority
since people tend
to prefer their own
VOIP solutions.
See the link
in my signature
for publicly accessible
teamspeak servers.
We need voip
Cos pug matches
Involve casual players
Dropping in
Who don't have
Regular teammates
To voip with
So we need in game voip
Posted 17 April 2013 - 07:02 PM
Willie Sauerland, on 17 April 2013 - 05:48 PM, said:
Well written and accurate.
The problem is,
does PGIGP
have enough staff
to actually implement this?
Do they have
enough staff
to support it?
That could be a
part of the problem
as well...
Lukoi, on 17 April 2013 - 05:55 PM, said:
MentalPatient, on 17 April 2013 - 06:58 PM, said:
We need voip
Cos pug matches
Involve casual players
Dropping in
Who don't have
Regular teammates
To voip with
So we need in game voip
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users