Edited by Khan Reaper, 19 April 2013 - 12:38 AM.


Hmmm...did They Make The Change On The Weight Balancing Today?
#1
Posted 19 April 2013 - 12:38 AM
#2
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:07 AM
If they think they put the weight balance in, they did it wrong.
#3
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:09 AM
#4
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:10 AM

#5
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:11 AM
#7
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:22 AM
Svidro, on 19 April 2013 - 01:07 AM, said:
If they think they put the weight balance in, they did it wrong.
100 tons don't seem a big deal to me.
#8
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:43 AM
in the spidy - 3 ppc will kill you in 1 shot, 2 gauss will kill you in 1 shot. AC40 obviously will kill me in 1 shot.
im afraid these are not the times for light pilots.
get your U/AC-10/5/2s and PPCs ladies and germs!! now is the time!
for all you assaults, remember how you were told never to run after lights? well now you should, they are easy bate!!!
#9
Posted 19 April 2013 - 02:03 AM
Never thought I'd miss LRM storms, but at least I could dodge those.
#11
Posted 19 April 2013 - 10:45 AM
Hopefully they just pushed it back like some people posted.
#12
Posted 19 April 2013 - 12:35 PM
Svidro, on 19 April 2013 - 10:45 AM, said:
Hopefully they just pushed it back like some people posted.
They didn't say WEIGHT balancing, they said weight CLASS balancing. Which is very different.
This means for every Assault you have, they have one--but it could be an Atlas, or an Awesome. For every Heavy you have, they have one--but it could be a Dragon or a Cataphract. For every Medium, etc., etc.
This means that the tolerance could be "0" and you could theoretically still be up or down about 160 tons.
#13
Posted 19 April 2013 - 12:37 PM
Svidro, on 19 April 2013 - 10:45 AM, said:
Zero weight tolerance is a little absurd target. I think anything within 150 tons is acceptable. Tonnage is not the end all of balance.
#14
Posted 19 April 2013 - 12:40 PM
Hammerfinn, on 19 April 2013 - 12:35 PM, said:
They didn't say WEIGHT balancing, they said weight CLASS balancing. Which is very different.
This means for every Assault you have, they have one--but it could be an Atlas, or an Awesome. For every Heavy you have, they have one--but it could be a Dragon or a Cataphract. For every Medium, etc., etc.
This means that the tolerance could be "0" and you could theoretically still be up or down about 160 tons.
That seems like something easy to check:
http://mwomercs.com/...making-phase-4/
WEIGHT CLASS MATCHING
We're adding the ability for us, the developers, to adjust our weight matching tolerances on the fly. This is giving us a controlled way to tighten up the weight imbalance between teams that players are experiencing.
...
Also:
Here's the plan:
On Tuesday, April 16th, we'll patch as normal and will put in the adjusted Elo values.
On Thursday, April 18th (tentative date), we'll drop the weight matching tolerance to zero. This won't require a patch or an interruption of service.
Edited by Asakara, 19 April 2013 - 12:41 PM.
#15
Posted 19 April 2013 - 12:48 PM
*sigh*
#16
Posted 19 April 2013 - 12:49 PM
Screech, on 19 April 2013 - 12:37 PM, said:
Zero weight tolerance is a little absurd target. I think anything within 150 tons is acceptable. Tonnage is not the end all of balance.
One hundred fifty tons will make a wild amount of difference in any match. About the only time it won't is if you've got stalkers vs atlas. And that is mostly because stalker has been overly gifted in many other ways. In almost every other case you definitely want the heaviest mech of it's class. Cataphracts over dragons and any assault at all over an awesome.
#17
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:14 PM
Keifomofutu, on 19 April 2013 - 12:49 PM, said:
One hundred fifty tons will make a wild amount of difference in any match. About the only time it won't is if you've got stalkers vs atlas. And that is mostly because stalker has been overly gifted in many other ways. In almost every other case you definitely want the heaviest mech of it's class. Cataphracts over dragons and any assault at all over an awesome.
Pilot skill matters more than mech weight. I happen to do way more damage and have more kills in my dragons than in my cataphracts.
#18
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:17 PM
Hammerfinn, on 19 April 2013 - 01:14 PM, said:
Pilot skill matters more than mech weight. I happen to do way more damage and have more kills in my dragons than in my cataphracts.
Random pilots will randomly equal out skill wise. Or do you have a crystal ball that guarantees that the outweighed team won't get the noobs as well? Pilot skill is an irrelevant argument to matchmaker balance. The mechs don't have to even up one for one in a balanced weight system. They just have to add up to a very close weight total. IE If they get a bigger assault you get a bigger heavy to balance it out.
Edited by Keifomofutu, 19 April 2013 - 01:19 PM.
#19
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:20 PM
Cel, on 19 April 2013 - 01:09 AM, said:
they said it was adjustable form the servers.
Screech, on 19 April 2013 - 12:37 PM, said:
Zero weight tolerance is a little absurd target. I think anything within 150 tons is acceptable. Tonnage is not the end all of balance.
doubt its actually going to be zero. probably a 50 ton leeway or something. and after a while the system adds more space.
#20
Posted 19 April 2013 - 01:24 PM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users