

Devs What Are You Planning To Do With Collisions Over The Next 7 Months Because Optimizing The Old System Just Doesnt Cut It.
#1
Posted 09 April 2013 - 09:55 AM
Since we are being forced to play a combat game that involves , oh about 200 "collisions" per match... without collisions for the better part of the year, what exactly do you have planned...
?
How about an update for the collisions mechanic WIP?
Its my opinion far to few people realize that in the mechwarrior universe , collisions are everything..
They are immersion, they are strategy,, they are cool.. THink of all the iconic Battletech imagery, most of them are depicting collisions of one variety or another..
I think its borderling insane to state that collisions are something we will see after launch.. Ive said it before, but I think a fair analogy is to release a racing game<psuedo sim> with out drafting or drift..
So, how about a little info since we have to stand in the corner for another 6 months min.
Anyone else long for some type of complex collision dfa models that can actually attract players because .. " hey giant robots smashing into each other is cool dontcha know?"
#2
Posted 09 April 2013 - 09:55 AM
#5
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:03 AM
Knockdown:
Needs to be based on momentum, IE Mass x Velocity vs Mass x Velocity. Cryengine should be capable of this kind of physics.
Collision damage/DFA:
Damage conversion based on momentum. This is the hardest part to get right but is critical for DFA to work. Also likely why it is getting put on hold so long.
#6
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:04 AM
#8
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:14 AM
My assumption is that knockdown as it was seen before mayl occur by heavy hitting weapons, like MW3 and MW4 based on certain factors. I assume collission damage itself will be tweaked, so ramming into someone will cause inreased damage (but not actual knocking them over) and probably Jump Jetting on to someone as well will have increased damage. That in itself would pave the way for testing grappling, punching, or attacks with melee weapons.
Edited by General Taskeen, 09 April 2013 - 10:15 AM.
#10
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:22 AM
Megalosauroid, on 09 April 2013 - 10:05 AM, said:
Yeah, hence the "what are you planning to do in the next 7 months" part.
My guess would be "work on implementing knock downs along with all the other stuff we have to work on." What kind of answer are you looking for? A detailed timeline with week by week tasks that it takes to get knockdown implemented?
Or do you just want a command chair post with a quick update on knockdowns? I think there are a lot of other things coming a lot sooner that I'd rather see command chair posts about. Given that it's 7 months away, there probably isn't a lot to update on at this point.
Edited by malibu43, 09 April 2013 - 10:23 AM.
#11
Posted 09 April 2013 - 10:27 AM
#12
Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:24 AM
Jetfire, on 09 April 2013 - 10:03 AM, said:
Knockdown:
Needs to be based on momentum, IE Mass x Velocity vs Mass x Velocity. Cryengine should be capable of this kind of physics.
Collision damage/DFA:
Damage conversion based on momentum. This is the hardest part to get right but is critical for DFA to work. Also likely why it is getting put on hold so long.
if they do indeed have something very nice in the works then i can completely deal with the timeline.. A rehash of what we had , no.
lets hope theyre working on something like you outlined.
irony1999, on 09 April 2013 - 10:20 AM, said:
Based off their answer, nothing. They're not looking at it till after launch.
lets hope thats NOT the answer.. I assumed we wont be seeing collisions till after launch., but they will be working on it till then. Not.. theyre not touching it till after launch.. If thats the case, then I think its a scary proposition when we would actually see collisions in game.
#14
Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:39 AM
mekabuser, on 09 April 2013 - 11:24 AM, said:
lets hope theyre working on something like you outlined.
lets hope thats NOT the answer.. I assumed we wont be seeing collisions till after launch., but they will be working on it till then. Not.. theyre not touching it till after launch.. If thats the case, then I think its a scary proposition when we would actually see collisions in game.
If this is the case then i think we will see collisions neverTM
wait... i think i did that TM thing wrong
#15
Posted 09 April 2013 - 11:39 AM
#16
Posted 09 April 2013 - 12:37 PM
General Taskeen, on 09 April 2013 - 10:14 AM, said:
Running through each other is exploitable, especially by light mechs that move faster anyways. It's still possible for teammates to troll you through Friendly Fire, and all-chat in game. Someone FF me and then claimed ecm was to blame for his stupid action.
Edit: My point is, if these concerns were the cause of collision removal, then the problem really hasn't been solved yet.
Edited by Xizore, 09 April 2013 - 12:42 PM.
#17
Posted 09 April 2013 - 01:06 PM
Then they'll start working on the actual physics of the collisions mass, velocity, what hits where, how much damage to impart to whom, calculating knockdown odds and so on.
What will they TELL us in this same time span? On collisions, probably not much, but we'll be getting other aspects of the actual core game between now and then, so we're not going to be lacking on information, it's just not always going to be the information we want

#18
Posted 09 April 2013 - 01:10 PM
What developer in their right minds is going to get into nitty gritty with something that is 6 months down the road? Seriously?
So you can trounce it out in 9 months and say: Hey, 9 months ago you said X, now we are getting Y ... come here so I can smack you in the face with this flounder.
Really? Why would they want to even expose themselves? Furthermore, this is like the 3rd thread I have seen on this ... you are not posting multiple threads are you?
#19
Posted 09 April 2013 - 01:12 PM
Sure i wanna do some highlander burials with my new toy but when i cave in someones cockpit i want it to work properly first time every time.
#20
Posted 09 April 2013 - 01:12 PM
Edited by Yoseful Mallad, 09 April 2013 - 01:13 PM.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users