42 replies to this topic

[ThinkTank]

I'm talking imagery and its connection to mammalian psychophysiology. You're the one that mentions weirdness, which is telling in and of itself. "Weird" is not a technical term and has no place in frank discussion. I dont think it's "weird" to be attracted to the opposite sex. Do you?

[Straften]

This should help us get back on topic

[Cryptozoology]

ThinkTank, on 03 May 2013 - 12:27 AM, said:

I'm talking imagery and its connection to mammalian psychophysiology. You're the one that mentions weirdness, which is telling in and of itself. "Weird" is not a technical term and has no place in frank discussion. I dont think it's "weird" to be attracted to the opposite sex. Do you?

oh no absolutely not, of course it isn't weird for people to be attracted to other people, although you might consider couching your question in language that isn't so heteronormative. anyway seeing as how this isn't an academic discussion and hasn't been from the beginning, something i think i telegraphed adequately enough though maybe to subtly for some people, i think "weird" is a perfectly cromulent word to describe your choice of analogy and the things that it betrays about your thought processes, ie: that you understand that women in the sex industry are objectified to an insane degree and that you are also simultaneously totally okay with that.

and then there's the bonkers undercurrent in your posting that reveals you've probably put a lot of thought into biotruths and tbh that's p whack too

Edited by Cryptozoology, 03 May 2013 - 11:47 AM.