Jump to content

The Post Lerian Jihad Forward Operating Base And Recruitment Center


217 replies to this topic

#121 Cryptozoology

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 90 posts

Posted 10 May 2013 - 11:06 PM

View PostNoesis, on 09 May 2013 - 11:10 PM, said:

a w hole pile of words


friend noesis i think that if you take a quick gander at the timeline of This Here Thread i think you'll find that pretty much all posts on the current topic of the thread that i made were in response to other people's posts ?

i mean, really , all i really did here was call jeff dunham's puppets racist, which they are, and then reply to people.

so

i mean if you think about it




aren't you guys the real thread derailers ?





i mean isn't that kind of what you do ?








~makes u think~

#122 blinkin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,195 posts
  • LocationEquestria

Posted 11 May 2013 - 12:34 AM

View PostmiSs, on 10 May 2013 - 11:21 AM, said:

Keep calm and visit page 10.

Cheers!

VIOLATION OF THE PAGE 10 RULE!

#123 Noesis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,436 posts
  • LocationIn the Lab

Posted 11 May 2013 - 05:01 AM

Posted Image

Today I has interesting wall to watch

#124 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 11 May 2013 - 05:45 AM

View PostCryptozoology, on 10 May 2013 - 11:03 PM, said:

friend willie sutherland could you please let me know which of your rules i'm violating thx id appreciate it


As the goons have claimed leadership of all House Liao
and you are clearly a member of House Liao
it stands to reason you are a goon even if you have no
affiliation with that particular group, per se.
As such, the particular rule in violation would be the 6th.
:P



#125 Texas Merc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Patron
  • The Patron
  • 1,237 posts

Posted 11 May 2013 - 09:02 PM

Crypto I admire your courage to bring peace to all peoples. Unfortunately, unless you have some ability to control all Human emotion and reason under your control, then I will have to say you fail. Fail in all arguments or any reason. If you are a Troll then so be it.

ie 10 hates these forums and spaces and indentations but these forums kinda suck anyway

#126 Cryptozoology

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 90 posts

Posted 11 May 2013 - 10:11 PM

View PostWillie Sauerland, on 11 May 2013 - 05:45 AM, said:


As the goons have claimed leadership of all House Liao
and you are clearly a member of House Liao
it stands to reason you are a goon even if you have no
affiliation with that particular group, per se.
As such, the particular rule in violation would be the 6th.
:)





oh


welp.





sorry

#127 Cryptozoology

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 90 posts

Posted 11 May 2013 - 10:19 PM

View PostTexas Merc, on 11 May 2013 - 09:02 PM, said:

Crypto I admire your courage to bring peace to all peoples. Unfortunately, unless you have some ability to control all Human emotion and reason under your control, then I will have to say you fail. Fail in all arguments or any reason. If you are a Troll then so be it.

ie 10 hates these forums and spaces and indentations but these forums kinda suck anyway



it's not about bringing peace to all people that's impossible! not that that isn't the glorious and ever-distant future towards which all of humanity should strive. if you never stop reaching for the stars then before you know it you will have achieved such dizzying heights, Texas Mercenary.

but anyway what the more immediate short - term goal is is gradual progress, baby steps. maybe one person stops and thinks before they make a super hilarious joke about assaulting some girl they seen at a club. maybe some dude calls his friends out for being discriminatory against that one black guy that they all work with. maybe a group of friends decide not to vote for a politician because of some sexist screed he published on the creepy far-right echo chamber he likes to post in. these are small achievements but they are victories regardless

no one person can change the world or bring an end to all human suffering, but through constant concerted effort gradual changes can be wrought in society. it won't be easy, Texas Mercenary, the right thing to do never is. we will stumble and we will fall, but there is greatness just outside of our reach, and how can we stop grasping for it ? we owe ourselves to keep fighting. we owe it to ourselves and to the future

Edited by Cryptozoology, 11 May 2013 - 10:20 PM.


#128 Noesis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,436 posts
  • LocationIn the Lab

Posted 12 May 2013 - 12:15 AM

View PostCryptozoology, on 11 May 2013 - 10:19 PM, said:



it's not about bringing peace to all people that's impossible! not that that isn't the glorious and ever-distant future towards which all of humanity should strive. if you never stop reaching for the stars then before you know it you will have achieved such dizzying heights, Texas Mercenary.

but anyway what the more immediate short - term goal is is gradual progress, baby steps. maybe one person stops and thinks before they make a super hilarious joke about assaulting some girl they seen at a club. maybe some dude calls his friends out for being discriminatory against that one black guy that they all work with. maybe a group of friends decide not to vote for a politician because of some sexist screed he published on the creepy far-right echo chamber he likes to post in. these are small achievements but they are victories regardless

no one person can change the world or bring an end to all human suffering, but through constant concerted effort gradual changes can be wrought in society. it won't be easy, Texas Mercenary, the right thing to do never is. we will stumble and we will fall, but there is greatness just outside of our reach, and how can we stop grasping for it ? we owe ourselves to keep fighting. we owe it to ourselves and to the future


Posted Image

Useful evidence that from all sensible appearance suggests that Liao moderators think that derailment of threads is not a socially acceptable posting practice.

But more interestingly then is the evidence that doesn't really demonstrate the best practice of the applied social humour you seem to be concerned about considering it is advocating the acceptance of slavery or removal of human rights?

[cynical]
I mean what if someone accepts this demonstration of fantasy based humour like Jeff Dunham's puppetry as being behaviour they can translate as acceptable into a real life social context. I mean these "influences" you suggest that we cannot simply apply mature filtering to won't protect people from your commentary and I'm now concerned for the numerous domino influences you may have created to all the Liao pilot populace and beyond. I would suggest you may have considerable reparation to make if you uphold your beliefs with any real convictions.
[/cynical]

Edited by Noesis, 12 May 2013 - 12:59 AM.


#129 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 12 May 2013 - 02:17 AM

View PostCryptozoology, on 11 May 2013 - 10:11 PM, said:



oh


welp.





sorry


I assure you it is nothing personal.
You are of course welcome to stay.
I just wanted to ensure you were aware of the rules.
And of course your breaking thereof.
:)



#130 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 12 May 2013 - 02:22 AM

View PostNoesis, on 12 May 2013 - 12:15 AM, said:

[cynical]
I mean what if someone accepts this demonstration of fantasy based humour like Jeff Dunham's puppetry as being behaviour they can translate as acceptable into a real life social context. I mean these "influences" you suggest that we cannot simply apply mature filtering to won't protect people from your commentary and I'm now concerned for the numerous domino influences you may have created to all the Liao pilot populace and beyond. I would suggest you may have considerable reparation to make if you uphold your beliefs with any real convictions.
[/cynical]


Interesting.
It appears we have a Liao charlatan in our midst.
Good job going and finding the evidence Noesis!
I would like your post multiple times if I could.



#131 Noesis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,436 posts
  • LocationIn the Lab

Posted 12 May 2013 - 03:27 AM

View PostWillie Sauerland, on 12 May 2013 - 02:22 AM, said:


Interesting.
It appears we have a Liao charlatan in our midst.
Good job going and finding the evidence Noesis!
I would like your post multiple times if I could.




It is with a heavy heart that such efforts were applied since it is potentially only helping to add to any of the related "blame culture" practices being exercised for affect in this thread, as opposed to focusing on the related topic material in a more constructive way and respectful framework.

But apparently sometimes this kind of method is necessary in terms of a corrective process to social functioning as advised by some for the greater good sometimes so I'm not too concerned.

There is I think an important distinction between "talking the path" and "walking the path" that reflects with some pertinence on the discussion and how it is being treated, so as a result thought it relevant to include.

It is a pity really given the aspiring motivations that are being mentioned within the discussion.

Edited by Noesis, 12 May 2013 - 04:24 AM.


#132 Cryptozoology

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 90 posts

Posted 12 May 2013 - 11:50 AM

Friend Noesis you're back ! how good to see you !

and even gooder to see that you wasted a bunch of your time looking at my posting history, how flattering of you to do ! :)


unfortunately though it looks like you may have Missed The Point Completely.

as i said before it's all about a matter of degrees, about context, and complicated issues like social interaction require a modicum of critical thinking to interact with intellectually.

you see, the Capellan Confederation is a neo-feudal galactic state founded in the year 2367 and existing only within the fictional Battletech Universe, a setting for a bunch of tabletop and video games starring giant robots that can transform into planes and shoot lasers. it's Not A Real Place and its people Don't Exist. so you see, friend Noesis, if one were to make a joke about how this fictional autocratic hellhole is a feudal nightmare, it's not really a big problem because Nobody Who Really Exists Actually Lives There.

if we wanted to examine house liao and how it might be damaging real life people though we could certainly take a look at how there's a bunch of problematic stereotypes about asians and asian rulers wrapped up there and that's certainly a problem when a person designs a thing and buys into a bunch of real-life stereotypes and then disseminates their fictional creation and now a bunch of people are growing up and The Bad Guy Is A Crazy Asian Person.

on the other hand, friend Noesis, we have people like Jeff Dunham, who I guess we're still on, and he makes jokes about Arabs and Terrorism, which are Real Things In The Real World Where You And I Both Live. So when Jeff Dunham makes a joke about arabs or does an insulting caricature of a middle eastern accent etc etc etc etc etc etc etc then these are jokes about Real Life People.

do you see how there is a difference there between Literally Made Up By Some Guy And Not Real At All and Actually Real And Existing Right Now ?

#133 Noesis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,436 posts
  • LocationIn the Lab

Posted 12 May 2013 - 12:26 PM

I don't see any distinction based on your argument.

Exposure to a fictional reality as a form of entertainment where people can explore ideas as a thought exercise still exposes people to the social ideas as represented within them. This since your argument was that irrespective of the context people are incapable of discerning the appropriate truth related to the content and would apply unintentional social consequences due to this impressionability.

#134 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 12 May 2013 - 12:28 PM


Cryptozoology, if I may request a point of clarification,
you are stating context is important.
In other words, the fact racism exists within a fictional universe
and it is adhered to within the context of "role-play" then it is ok
and as such Asians, for one, should not get upset for this fictionalized racism
as it does not translate into the non-fictional universe per se.
However, as Jeff Dunham is clearly real talking about real things in a
non-fictional universe then it stands to reason it only perpetrates racism
within the real world.
Am I understanding your point correctly?



#135 Cryptozoology

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 90 posts

Posted 12 May 2013 - 12:51 PM

View PostNoesis, on 12 May 2013 - 12:26 PM, said:

I don't see any distinction based on your argument.

Exposure to a fictional reality as a form of entertainment where people can explore ideas as a thought exercise still exposes people to the social ideas as represented within them. This since your argument was that irrespective of the context people are incapable of discerning the appropriate truth related to the content and would apply unintentional social consequences due to this impressionability.


yes exactly except you seem to still be grappling with the idea that Some Things Matter More Than Others. as an example: feudal societies no longer exist ! we don't live in a world where there is a society which has as one of its core societal structures a reciprocal relationship between a warrior class, a landed nobility and a disenfranchised labor class. this isn't a problem in society, and doesn't affect anybody, so a joke about how a landed noble could order around peasants like they were playthings is pretty much equivalent to a joke about dragons or unicorns or The God Emperor Of The Galaxy Crushing The Opposition With His Legions Of Space Marines.


View PostWillie Sauerland, on 12 May 2013 - 12:28 PM, said:


Cryptozoology, if I may request a point of clarification,
you are stating context is important.
In other words, the fact racism exists within a fictional universe
and it is adhered to within the context of "role-play" then it is ok
and as such Asians, for one, should not get upset for this fictionalized racism
as it does not translate into the non-fictional universe per se.
However, as Jeff Dunham is clearly real talking about real things in a
non-fictional universe then it stands to reason it only perpetrates racism
within the real world.
Am I understanding your point correctly?




it looks like you aren't understanding my point correctly, friend William. the argument that problematic elements in a work of fiction are de facto totally okay because the work is fictional is bunk - if i might diverge a little bit to make a point by analogy, let's suppose that I wrote a book where there's a space colony on a planet where a bunch of white astronauts settle down and start a colony and they import a bunch of death-row inmates from earth to do all the agricultural work. then this new space society starts to resemble the antebellum southern united states and through a bunch of weird pseudoscience i make up this state of affairs is justified and i depict this new colony as an ideal place to live and the primarily black population of inmates are at peace with their lot in life, and where everything owns and is operating As Nature Intended.

do you see how my book, while fictionalized, is advocating a society built on the enslavement of black people and depicting it as a great place to live and is therefore Really Terrible ?

to get back to BattleTech, I don't really play a whole pile of tabletop battletech or consume expanded universe fiction ( i do neither of these things at all ) but if we were to take the case of the Capellan Confederation and examine it, we would find an autocratic feudal society where the lower classes are disenfranchised and underprivileged, and we would also find that this society is depicted as A Bad Thing in the fiction. That's okay I guess ?

we would also find however that their leaders are a ruling party of people of asian descent and they're depicted as scheming manipulative sneaky and evil. these are common stereotypes found throughout many types of fiction about asian leaders. these instances while taken in isolation, are not so bad! after all, you could certainly have a future society where the leaders are all dicks and they just so happen to all be asian, and that's not a problem if this fictional setting existed in a vacuum. but the fictional setting Does Not Exist In A Vacuum ! it is part of the fantasy / sci fi tabletop game genre and if we look at OTHER material of this type, we see many OTHER instances of rulers who are evil dicks and are asian people. And we see this in books as well. And comic books. and video games. and movies. and music videos. and we see this depiction in the news when discussing asian countries, and we hear about it on the radio, and people we know talk about real life asian leaders like this. when we take into account The Whole Of Real Society That We Live In and and understand that fictional works do not exist in isolation from the rest of society we can see how one small instance of something kinda racist contributes to a Racist Culture where we are bombarded through multimedia constantly all the time every day every where by the same racist stereotypes and this fosters and reinforces racist attitudes in us and in the rest of society.

#136 Noesis

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 4,436 posts
  • LocationIn the Lab

Posted 12 May 2013 - 01:06 PM

Crypto, you may want to look into the subject of affective psychology.

It may help you explore the realms of how people respond in an emotional way to stimuli even fictional. It includes subject material like repression of ideas, subconscious processes and triggering mechanisms from associative connotations held in the persons memory or associated parts of their existing personality and understanding.

But a simple example that might explain my point: A horror movie is catergorised as such due to the expected emotional response to the viewing of the content even if a work of fiction.

#137 Texas Merc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Patron
  • The Patron
  • 1,237 posts

Posted 12 May 2013 - 03:09 PM

this is currently my favorite thread for some reason.

#138 Cryptozoology

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 90 posts

Posted 12 May 2013 - 03:57 PM

View PostNoesis, on 12 May 2013 - 01:06 PM, said:

Crypto, you may want to look into the subject of affective psychology.

It may help you explore the realms of how people respond in an emotional way to stimuli even fictional. It includes subject material like repression of ideas, subconscious processes and triggering mechanisms from associative connotations held in the persons memory or associated parts of their existing personality and understanding.

But a simple example that might explain my point: A horror movie is catergorised as such due to the expected emotional response to the viewing of the content even if a work of fiction.


sorry friend Noesis do you think that you could use another example to explain your point ? i don't know if i understand what your point is, maybe you could expand a little on affective psychology as it's something I don't think I've heard about before

#139 Texas Merc

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Patron
  • The Patron
  • 1,237 posts

Posted 12 May 2013 - 07:07 PM

hey here is a pro tip guys: YOU CAN'T CHANGE HUMAN NATURE. that is all

#140 Cryptozoology

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • 90 posts

Posted 12 May 2013 - 07:42 PM

a fallacious appeal to a nebulous and ill-defined so called "human nature" is frequently used as a defense for something that one is being confronted about - of course i shot that guy sneaking around on my lawn in the middle of the night five times then chased him down when he tried to escape and unloaded the rest of my bullets into his back, self defense is human nature ! ! ! ! not only that but it's a pretty poor defense as what exactly constitutes "human nature" is unclear and if i were to press you, friend texan mercenary about what you mean by human nature what exactly would you say it was ? what aspect of "human nature" is it that you claim is immutable and justifies the objectionable parts of society we've been discussing ?

and even if this human nature did exist and was immutable then why is it a good justification for People Doing Bad Things ?

i sometimes see nice things in stores i want but if i just start grabbing them i can't tell the police "you don't understand i really wanted this pile of stuff"

Edited by Cryptozoology, 12 May 2013 - 07:43 PM.




6 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 6 guests, 0 anonymous users