

Misery Pay To Win!
#1
Posted 05 May 2013 - 06:15 AM
#2
Posted 05 May 2013 - 06:33 AM
The Misery is not going to beat any other stalker instantly just cause of AC's.
If you want AC's get an atlas.
And if you think different players having different capabilities is wrong, go play COD...
#3
Posted 05 May 2013 - 06:35 AM
No other mech in game have such big side torso,which means your ballistic weapon won't last long.Where is P2W in that,could you explain?Maybe you say as well that X-5 is P2W too as it has missile hardpoints while the other cicadas haven't?
Edited by MasterBLB, 09 May 2013 - 03:34 AM.
#4
Posted 05 May 2013 - 06:39 AM
#5
Posted 05 May 2013 - 06:41 AM
Hero mechs are in no way instantly superior to the standard variants.
A different hard-point/slot allocation, paint scheme, name and XP and C-bill bonus serve only to make the game have a little more variety.
i do not fear hero variants more than other mechs.
#6
Posted 05 May 2013 - 06:45 AM

#7
Posted 05 May 2013 - 06:53 AM
GoManGo, on 05 May 2013 - 06:45 AM, said:

No offense, but the cicada is the fastest mech in the game and IS a medium
#8
Posted 05 May 2013 - 06:58 AM
FlyingTurtle, on 05 May 2013 - 06:53 AM, said:
No offense, but the cicada is the fastest mech in the game and IS a medium
Well after buying a copy of MechWarrior 4 Mercenaries and playing it online MWO mechs are like turtles stuck in a sand pit .It is the way the mechs move and accelerate in MWO that makes them so stupid overall if you don't believe me go on E-Bay buy a copy of Mercenaries and play it? http://video.search....=yfp-t-900&tt=b
#9
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:02 AM
coolcook007, on 05 May 2013 - 06:15 AM, said:
So? You don't have to pay to get an assault with ballistics. Just get a highlander or atlas.
Not P2W.
GoManGo, on 05 May 2013 - 06:58 AM, said:
Well after buying a copy of MechWarrior 4 Mercenaries and playing it online MWO mechs are like turtles stuck in a sand pit .It is the way the mechs move and accelerate in MWO that makes them so stupid overall if you don't believe me go on E-Bay buy a copy of Mercenaries and play it? http://video.search....=yfp-t-900&tt=b
I hated MW4 for that very reason. Mechs didn't feel like Mechs, they felt like people. There was no feeling of *mass*, of being in a huge engine of destruction. MW4 was terrible.
#10
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:05 AM
GoManGo, on 05 May 2013 - 06:45 AM, said:
If you don't like slow mechs, why did you buy a Stalker? Hell, why did you buy an assault at all?
Get a Jagermech, Catapult, or Dragon. My Flame ticks along at 104kph quite nicely, and kittycats easily manage 86kph.
#11
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:06 AM
#12
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:08 AM
Wintersdark, on 05 May 2013 - 07:02 AM, said:
Not P2W.
I hated MW4 for that very reason. Mechs didn't feel like Mechs, they felt like people. There was no feeling of *mass*, of being in a huge engine of destruction. MW4 was terrible.
If PGI would have taken just stock MechWarrior 4 Mercenaries and remade it with all new Graphics and sound remade the maps like in MWO and added a chat/game launcher lobby then ladder leagues and planetary I would bet you $1 million USD we would have over a million players playing the game world wide instead we have a buggy mess that is a crap MechWarrior game overall and the Devs and mods even attack and try to destroy there own player base and fans on the forums.
#13
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:09 AM
GoManGo, on 05 May 2013 - 07:08 AM, said:
If PGI would have taken just stock MechWarrior 4 Mercenaries and remade it with all new Graphics and sound remade the maps like in MWO and added a chat/game launcher lobby then ladder leagues and planetary I would bet you $1 million USD we would have over a million players playing the game world wide instead we have a buggy mess that is a crap MechWarrior game overall and the Devs and mods even attack and try to destroy there own player base and fans on the forums.
Maybe. I wouldn't be one of them, though, I hated MW4 with a passion - it wasn't Mechwarrior, it was a standard FPS with mech skins.
#14
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:10 AM
#15
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:13 AM
#16
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:14 AM
I'll move this thread to the
Edited by Prosperity Park, 05 May 2013 - 07:16 AM.
#17
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:17 AM
#18
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:40 AM
GoManGo, on 05 May 2013 - 06:58 AM, said:
Well after buying a copy of MechWarrior 4 Mercenaries and playing it online MWO mechs are like turtles stuck in a sand pit .It is the way the mechs move and accelerate in MWO that makes them so stupid overall if you don't believe me go on E-Bay buy a copy of Mercenaries and play it? http://video.search....=yfp-t-900&tt=b
First. You do know that MW4merc is free to get now? Paying money for something that you can get for free is, well, strange().
Second: MWO is not MW4. If you want to play MW4 i would suggest to play MW4 (obviously).
And i like the movement of the mechs (the accelerate and break). Combined with the mech tweaks for different turning and torso twist, it give a bit more varieties. Now all they have to do it to remove the 140kph limit after the fix of the netcode (cicada with 178 kph no armor, no weapons, but damm fast).
#19
Posted 05 May 2013 - 07:45 AM
Especially not if there are alternatives with similar loadouts.
If weapons would generate less heat or weight less on this mech. This would be P2W.
if his armor would be 2x as strong as the normal mech armor for normal weight. This would be P2W.
If he would have more critical slots as a normal mech (more than only the hand and lower arm activators). This would be P2W.
If he would a Warhawk with full loadout instead of a stalker . This would be P2W.
A Stalker with a ballistic slot? Not P2W.
#20
Posted 05 May 2013 - 08:21 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users