Jump to content

Why I ******* Hate Elo.


125 replies to this topic

Poll: This, is a poll. (22 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you like ELO?

  1. Biased Option #1 (11 votes [5.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.61%

  2. Biased Option #2 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  3. Biased Option #3 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  4. Biased Option #4 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  5. Biased Option #5 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  6. Biased Option #6 (11 votes [5.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.61%

  7. Biased Option #7 (11 votes [5.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.61%

  8. Biased Option #8 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  9. Biased Option #9 (12 votes [6.12%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 6.12%

  10. Biased Option #10 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  11. Biased Option #11 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  12. Biased Option #12 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  13. Biased Option #13 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  14. Biased Option #14 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  15. Biased Option #15 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  16. Biased Option #16 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  17. Voted Biased Option #17 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  18. Biased Option #18 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  19. Biased Option #19 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  20. Biased Option #20 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

Do you think I'm right?

  1. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #1 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  2. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #2 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  3. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #3 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  4. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #4 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  5. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #5 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  6. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #6 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  7. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #7 (11 votes [5.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.61%

  8. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #8 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  9. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #9 (13 votes [6.63%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 6.63%

  10. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #10 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  11. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #11 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  12. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #12 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  13. Voted Biased Option In Favor of Poster #13 (11 votes [5.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.61%

  14. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #14 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  15. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #15 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  16. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #16 (10 votes [5.10%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.10%

  17. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #17 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  18. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #18 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  19. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #19 (9 votes [4.59%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

  20. Biased Option In Favor of Poster #20 (11 votes [5.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 5.61%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#41 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 29 May 2013 - 05:38 PM

View PostRyvucz, on 29 May 2013 - 02:51 PM, said:

That's too vague. I shall blame ELO instead.


You could just suck less...
Or give in to the "competitive builds" side of the Forst.
(It was a stretch but so worth it... :) )



#42 Ryvucz

    Zunrith

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,839 posts
  • LocationColorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 31 May 2013 - 09:58 AM

View PostWillie Sauerland, on 29 May 2013 - 05:38 PM, said:


You could just suck less...
Or give in to the "competitive builds" side of the Forst.
(It was a stretch but so worth it... :( )




I refuse to make "competitive builds", so it's ELO's fault.

You hear that Mr. ELO!?

ALL

YOUR

FAULT!

#43 Ryvucz

    Zunrith

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,839 posts
  • LocationColorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 02 June 2013 - 09:09 PM

So, how do I suck less in this scenario?

Posted Image

#44 blinkin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,195 posts
  • LocationEquestria

Posted 02 June 2013 - 09:31 PM

View PostRyvucz, on 02 June 2013 - 09:09 PM, said:

So, how do I suck less in this scenario?

Posted Image

well if your catapult used SRM then you need to be more careful and plan out your approach. if your catapult used LRM, assault mechs are big and slow. usually very tasty targets for an LRM mech. you don't even have to hold the target the whole time. assault mechs are far too slow to dodge very far.

#45 Ryvucz

    Zunrith

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,839 posts
  • LocationColorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 03 June 2013 - 03:15 AM

View Postblinkin, on 02 June 2013 - 09:31 PM, said:

well if your catapult used SRM then you need to be more careful and plan out your approach. if your catapult used LRM, assault mechs are big and slow. usually very tasty targets for an LRM mech. you don't even have to hold the target the whole time. assault mechs are far too slow to dodge very far.


I'm pointing out the massive tonnage difference. ;D

My A1 has a mix of LRM and SRM, just in case you wondered. =O

#46 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 03 June 2013 - 08:01 AM

View PostRyvucz, on 02 June 2013 - 09:09 PM, said:

So, how do I suck less in this scenario?

Posted Image


How do you suck less?
Stop SCOUTING with your CATAPULT!



#47 blinkin

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 3,195 posts
  • LocationEquestria

Posted 03 June 2013 - 10:26 AM

View PostWillie Sauerland, on 03 June 2013 - 08:01 AM, said:

How do you suck less?
Stop SCOUTING with your CATAPULT!

i scout with my SRM catapult C4 and do well. you just have to be tactical and come up on a side where no one is expecting you.

#48 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 03 June 2013 - 11:34 AM

View Postblinkin, on 03 June 2013 - 10:26 AM, said:


i scout with my SRM catapult C4 and do well. you just have to be tactical and come up on a side where no one is expecting you.


You and I can do this.
Rycuz has difficulties.
Hence my suggestion.
:)



#49 Ryvucz

    Zunrith

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,839 posts
  • LocationColorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 03 June 2013 - 04:56 PM

View PostWillie Sauerland, on 03 June 2013 - 11:34 AM, said:


You and I can do this.
Rycuz has difficulties.
Hence my suggestion.
;)




I made misstep off a cliff while attempting to lock onto a target, and fell.

That was unintentional.

However, seeing the massive amount of assaults they had, it did not matter.

#50 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 04 June 2013 - 05:24 AM

View PostRyvucz, on 03 June 2013 - 04:56 PM, said:

I made misstep off a cliff while attempting to lock onto a target, and fell. That was unintentional. However, seeing the massive amount of assaults they had, it did not matter.


Wrong.
You had plenty of mobility on your side.
The advantage should have been yours.



#51 Ryvucz

    Zunrith

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,839 posts
  • LocationColorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 04 June 2013 - 12:19 PM

View PostWillie Sauerland, on 04 June 2013 - 05:24 AM, said:


Wrong.
You had plenty of mobility on your side.
The advantage should have been yours.




I object.

#52 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 05 June 2013 - 08:09 AM

View PostRyvucz, on 04 June 2013 - 12:19 PM, said:

I object.


Wow.
It really pains me to do this, but you obviously want it...
Posted Image



#53 Mike Forst

    Postmaster General

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 577 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 05 June 2013 - 03:14 PM

View PostRyvucz, on 02 June 2013 - 09:09 PM, said:

So, how do I suck less in this scenario? Posted Image


Don't use a bad mech

#54 Ryvucz

    Zunrith

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 2,839 posts
  • LocationColorado Springs, Colorado

Posted 07 June 2013 - 11:44 AM

View PostMike Forst, on 05 June 2013 - 03:14 PM, said:


Don't use a bad mech


>GASP<

Ooooo, I'm tellllllinnnnn'!

You said the "B" word!

View PostWillie Sauerland, on 05 June 2013 - 08:09 AM, said:


Wow.
It really pains me to do this, but you obviously want it...
Posted Image




I don't actually understand what this means.

Is it like an alert for an incoming missile, or similar to a Red Alert?

#55 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 10 June 2013 - 07:18 AM

View PostRyvucz, on 07 June 2013 - 11:44 AM, said:

I don't actually understand what this means.

Is it like an alert for an incoming missile, or similar to a Red Alert?


Just ignore the blinking red light.
Don't worry...
It'll all be over soon.
;)



#56 Mike Forst

    Postmaster General

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 577 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 10 June 2013 - 07:41 AM

View PostWillie Sauerland, on 10 June 2013 - 07:18 AM, said:


Just ignore the blinking red light.
Don't worry...
It'll all be over soon.
;)




Wish the same could be said for your posting

#57 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 10 June 2013 - 01:24 PM

View PostMike Forst, on 10 June 2013 - 07:41 AM, said:

Wish the same could be said for your posting


So, you are anti-never not post?
:rolleyes:



#58 Mike Forst

    Postmaster General

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 577 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 10 June 2013 - 01:44 PM

No but that was just too easy a shot to take

#59 Willie Sauerland

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bad Company
  • Bad Company
  • 1,209 posts
  • LocationKansas City, Missouri, USA

Posted 11 June 2013 - 04:18 AM

View PostMike Forst, on 10 June 2013 - 01:44 PM, said:

No but that was just too easy a shot to take


True.
I did leave myself open for that one.
Well played Sir, well played.



#60 Mike Forst

    Postmaster General

  • Developer
  • Developer
  • 577 posts
  • Twitter: Link
  • LocationVancouver, BC

Posted 11 June 2013 - 08:52 AM

Thank you



4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users