87 replies to this topic

[jaakkomm]

Whining about play styles is pointless but those ppc need a nerf.

[Lupus Aurelius]

jaakkomm, on 15 May 2013 - 11:00 AM, said:

Whining about play styles is pointless but those ppc need a nerf.

No, they don't....

(show us on the paper doll where the PPC touched you...)
(lol, see my previous post, see what I mean...)

Edited by Lupus Aurelius, 15 May 2013 - 11:04 AM.

[jaakkomm]

Yes, they do...

[Lupus Aurelius]

jaakkomm, on 15 May 2013 - 11:06 AM, said:

Yes, they do...

let's save some time here

No, they don't
yes, they do
no
yes
obligatory mother comment
obligatory father comment'
obligatory ****** comment
obligatory umad bro comment
obligatory strw man arguements
obligatory chewbacca defense comment

rinse, repeat....

[jaakkomm]

You forget Obligatory age comment.

[General Taskeen]

AntiCitizenJuan, on 14 May 2013 - 03:19 PM, said:

Is this a picture of the OP?

[AntiCitizenJuan]

General Taskeen, on 15 May 2013 - 11:40 AM, said:

Is this a picture of the OP?

If you want to get technical it's the pilot from the MW4 intro with some googly eyes, but yes, that is the implication

[I am]

Aww hes making googly eyes at me.

Sorry you don't like the OP's OP, or the OP. You one of those cats taht is crying for buffs to the discussed weapons? Doesn't change the truthfullness of the assertions.

[Keifomofutu]

I am, on 15 May 2013 - 01:11 PM, said:

Aww hes making googly eyes at me.

Sorry you don't like the OP's OP, or the OP. You one of those cats taht is crying for buffs to the discussed weapons? Doesn't change the truthfullness of the assertions.

If you had bothered to read any of the guides you would have learned how stuff like PPCs actually work. But instead you went off on some mostly dumb rant and got laughed at.

And the devs themselves admitted that basically all missiles are CT hungry mostly because of the splash mechanic. That's why they got nerfed so hard. Streaks still going for centre torso is not some brainstorm that you discovered first.

Edited by Keifomofutu, 15 May 2013 - 01:19 PM.

[I am]

Keifomofutu, on 15 May 2013 - 01:18 PM, said:

If you had bothered to read any of the guides you would have learned how stuff like PPCs actually work. But instead you went off on some mostly dumb rant and got laughed at.

And the devs themselves admitted that basically all missiles are CT hungry mostly because of the splash mechanic. That's why they got nerfed so hard. Streaks still going for centre torso is not some brainstorm that you discovered first.

Whaaaaa? LOL. Someones laughing. Yes, streaks still go CT, think I covered that in the OP, anything else to add?

Also said, SRMs work fine now, PPCs are effective at close range, and LRMs are currently very effective. Threw in that commandos are fantastic, a mech that by and large the masses have labeled as sub-par.

[Skadi]

My mind after reading this

[IceSerpent]

I am, on 14 May 2013 - 07:08 PM, said:

That I am doing well with the above weapon systems is not opinion, it is fact. I am seing it, I am doing it. It leads me to speculate that most, not all, but most of the named systems actually work just fine and the tears are unjustified.

Did you ever consider that your definition of "doing well" might be vastly different from the one the rest of us use?

[RG Notch]

IceSerpent, on 15 May 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:

Did you ever consider that your definition of "doing well" might be vastly different from the one the rest of us use?

Or that you are playing with people who don't know any better? I have to say I hadn't played a light in awhile and I guess my Elo reset because I say mechs and weapons used that I haven't seen in months and wow, I was playing 2 of the worst mechs I've ever used and I was still killing some of these people. Some one had small pulse lasers and MGs, all he needed was an LBX to complete the trifecta of awful. Ok maybe a flamer.
In all seriousness, keep using what you find effective, me I'll keep using what I find effective and we'll all have fun. Of course if you think those issues people are talking about aren't real for competitive players I can't help you.

[Keifomofutu]

IceSerpent, on 15 May 2013 - 01:53 PM, said:

Did you ever consider that your definition of "doing well" might be vastly different from the one the rest of us use?

Obligatory Elo is E-low. The fact that he states he uses LRMs all the time and does super duper awesome with them should have been a good clue.

Edited by Keifomofutu, 15 May 2013 - 02:54 PM.

[I am]

You guys just cant stand it. No one is buying your forum tears for LRM buffs. Using them for a few matches a day, is far from all the time. At the mid to upper ELO you can do great with LRMs, if you know how and when to use them.

Keep lying. Even if you do get your unnecessary buffs, I'll just change weapons.

[Roland]

I am, on 15 May 2013 - 03:16 PM, said:

At the mid to upper ELO you can do great with LRMs, if you know how and when to use them.

Do you believe that you have a high Elo ranking?

[AntiCitizenJuan]

Roland, on 15 May 2013 - 03:42 PM, said:

Do you believe that you have a high Elo ranking?

which is why Elo should be visible

[Ph30nix]

im sorry any credibility your post might have had ended the second you said LRM's are still OP

[IceSerpent]

AntiCitizenJuan, on 15 May 2013 - 03:46 PM, said:

which is why Elo should be visible

I am not so sure - imagine the OP's shock and tears if he were to stare at the undeniable proof of his Elo rating being below 50...

[Keifomofutu]

IceSerpent, on 15 May 2013 - 04:11 PM, said:

I am not so sure - imagine the OP's shock and tears if he were to stare at the undeniable proof of his Elo rating being below 50...

I've played WoT. He would say that stats mean nothing and that he is just so unlucky that every single match he gets crappy teammates who just bring him down.

Edited by Keifomofutu, 15 May 2013 - 04:46 PM.