The X5, What A Disapointment....
#1
Posted 17 May 2013 - 02:42 AM
are there any plans to change the X5 or did i waste the mc for a 3rd class mech ? cause atm the 3M is by far better than the X5 when you give it the skeleton and the armor.
i´m really thinking about selling the X5 so i get the mechbay slot free for a different mech, please do something about this issue and give it at least the ams....cause the way it is at the moment its nothing but a prime target for every mech with LRM and rather useless.
hope you work on it and i dont regret i bought the damned think for MC
cheers,
durutti
#2
Posted 17 May 2013 - 03:04 AM
In fact your post is a duplicate of one posted just a day or two ago that got pages of respones defending the X-5.
Some tips
- remember your not really a medium. Your a heavier-than-usual-light. Play accordingly.
- The stock fit is actually very good on the x-5. What have you changed?
- Not every other mech has arms. See the other Cicada varients.
#3
Posted 17 May 2013 - 03:56 AM
i guess the main reason why it has no arms is pretty much explained in my first sentence... the jenner has at least the advantage of aiming vertical
Edited by Adrienne Vorton, 17 May 2013 - 03:57 AM.
#4
Posted 17 May 2013 - 04:02 AM
:-)
#5
Posted 17 May 2013 - 04:12 AM
#6
Posted 17 May 2013 - 04:13 AM
Or, if they ever buff SRMs back to their old values, using a pair of SRM6s would give you a very high alpha, making it great for backstabbing.
Really, without the SRM buff, the X-5 is a Jenner Prime without Jump Jets. So, I bought the X-5 assuming SRMs are going to get tweaked, since SRMs are currently awful.
#7
Posted 17 May 2013 - 04:14 AM
X-5 can pack respectable firepower and still run at 133km/h. With two SRM6 it becomes a first class backstabber and a big game hunter.
#8
Posted 17 May 2013 - 04:28 AM
Waiting to see what they do with SRM/SSRM long term before I look at it again.
Enjoying Cicada laser boat anyway.
#9
Posted 17 May 2013 - 04:28 AM
In which case I say FEE to you sir, why is AMS sooooooo important? Your too fast to hit with most missles anyway??
#10
Posted 17 May 2013 - 04:54 AM
Huntsman, on 17 May 2013 - 04:02 AM, said:
:-)
QFT
They are already tough to kill, adding a BAP will only make them better against lights.
And saying the X5 is bad? Maybe you are a bad pilot? Maybe leave the mech in its stock config?
#11
Posted 17 May 2013 - 07:10 AM
my problem isnt that i dont understand the cda nor that i got a problem with the mech.....all i wanted to say is that _every_ other mech got ams and/or ecm (the 3M) except this one....thats a information that should at least have a reason (except "its already that fast..."). and, with the modifications, the 3M is by far better (imho), the other versions for sure not much worse (the 3M with ecm and a ppc-flamer combination or with uac/lbx is a killer, has the same speed, ams AND ecm)
for sure adding an ecm or ams would justify the price (only purchasable with MC ???) better than the possible slots it has now, 3000MC are a nice amount and if i had knew that it had no ams/ecm i would have got me a different mech for that price - its no fun being downed by LRM when approaching the enemy
cheers,
durutti
Kitane, on 17 May 2013 - 04:14 AM, said:
X-5 can pack respectable firepower and still run at 133km/h. With two SRM6 it becomes a first class backstabber and a big game hunter.
well the srm 6 dont make much sense as it doesnt fire 6 missiles but only 2 at once so the chance to hit with a lot of them is rather small
#12
Posted 17 May 2013 - 07:19 AM
#13
Posted 17 May 2013 - 07:19 AM
#14
Posted 17 May 2013 - 07:29 AM
#16
Posted 17 May 2013 - 08:18 AM
4 ML + 2 streak + BAP (light crusher, after May 21st)
4 ML + 2 SRM6 (big mech backstabber)
#18
Posted 17 May 2013 - 01:36 PM
IMO, this mech doesn't need AMS. Also, it's arguably the best default loadout of any mech in the game. It comes standard with just about everything you would ever want to load. All I've done is drop a DHS and swap the SRM2s for streaks and I've been having a blast with this little *******.
#19
Posted 17 May 2013 - 01:39 PM
#20
Posted 17 May 2013 - 01:41 PM
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users