So, I Embraced The Cheese...
#21
Posted 01 June 2013 - 11:29 AM
#22
Posted 01 June 2013 - 11:31 AM
scJazz, on 01 June 2013 - 10:03 AM, said:
Well since there is currently no shake at all and shake is being implemented because of poptarting it would be a gigantic stretch to imagine that it wouldn't noticeably effect poptarting. This makes sense right?
Did you see the hack job they did with LRM's? Why would you expect this to work any better?
Dude42, on 01 June 2013 - 11:29 AM, said:
I feel like this may be a good way to go.
#23
Posted 01 June 2013 - 01:28 PM
Dude42, on 01 June 2013 - 11:29 AM, said:
My Jenner would be made very sad by this change.
Pretty much the only way to get a decent laser strike on the front of an assault/heavy mech is to run past them from behind, tap the jets, and face them while gliding away.
Heading straight towards a heavy/assault is asking to die, and with 1sec beam duration running past them spreads the damage out hugely, not to mention most decent players will still hit you.
#24
Posted 01 June 2013 - 02:33 PM
One Medic Army, on 01 June 2013 - 01:28 PM, said:
Pretty much the only way to get a decent laser strike on the front of an assault/heavy mech is to run past them from behind, tap the jets, and face them while gliding away.
Heading straight towards a heavy/assault is asking to die, and with 1sec beam duration running past them spreads the damage out hugely, not to mention most decent players will still hit you.
How do you think lights without jumpjets feel?
#25
Posted 01 June 2013 - 02:52 PM
But really, a moving heat scale (cap increases as HS numbers increase), no negative effects as the heat increases other than shutdown (or damage w/override), no negative effects from engine crits (+5 then +10 heat increase), cross hairs in zoom and real lack of convergence activity/cone of fire.
With JJ jitters, lights will be least affected since 99% do not fire from range but are generally up close as it is.
Edited by Tarl Cabot, 01 June 2013 - 02:54 PM.
#26
Posted 01 June 2013 - 03:03 PM
Chavette, on 01 June 2013 - 10:17 AM, said:
To some degree, I agree with you.
However... in order to, you know, use your weapons, you have to actually expose yourself to fire from the enemy. You can't spend too long sitting behind cover. You have to be able to seize the initiative at some point. If you're not luring the enemy in for a trap, then spending all day behind cover simply means that you'll be picked off one by one by the enemy that has gained command of the field.
And when you expose yourself to fire - unless you're running like a bat out of hell in a Jenner - you're going to find 4+ppcs deposited into a single point on your torso. A gauss round or two might connect elsewhere (if you're lucky - they'll just remove your arm).
It's getting pretty bad - to the point where people are using completely silly armor builds to try and counter the problem. I've run into several brawlers in my Jenner that have virtually no armor on their rear torso. I mean I just rake my lasers across them and I'm into their internals.
Why?
Because, most of the time, they are up against heavies and assaults that cannot capitalize on exposed flanks - yet they can also put stupid amounts of pinpoint damage onto one's armor. It's become turrett battles. Exactly what PGI said they were trying to move Mech Warrior away from.
#28
Posted 01 June 2013 - 03:28 PM
#30
Posted 01 June 2013 - 03:45 PM
Deathlike, on 01 June 2013 - 03:36 PM, said:
It is probably because they can't boat the weapons that the Stalker and Atlas can routinely enjoy.
What is your point? Stalker and Atlai has no jumpjets.
Treb poptarts were a pain in the *** also. Need BV or tonnage limits to make them a pain again.
#31
Posted 01 June 2013 - 04:02 PM
Chemie, on 01 June 2013 - 09:27 AM, said:
I don't think he's ever said anything but that line after any of the balance passes or introduction of new, overpowered or nullifying items. It's his standard line.
NRP, on 01 June 2013 - 03:28 PM, said:
Hey! What about my poptart SDR-5D? It's got lots of jump jets and not quite that many ERPPCs. Well to tell the truth it has just the one. And that's its only weapon. But never you mind, it's a poptart I tell you! Pop. Tart!
#32
Posted 01 June 2013 - 04:05 PM
mt CTF-1X with 4 PPCs does just as well as my 3D
the 3D has the jump jets
but the 1X goes 86.6
anything with a 35-60 point long range alpha is devastating
with PPCs you can have huge alphas for really low tonnages
PPCs seem to do 8 damage at 800 meters from my experience, no need for high heat ERs
#33
Posted 01 June 2013 - 04:29 PM
Edustaja, on 01 June 2013 - 09:37 AM, said:
3D cataphracts at least have a serious drawback in its comparable fragility.
and low hanging fruit. (weapons)
Aim64C, on 01 June 2013 - 03:03 PM, said:
To some degree, I agree with you.
However... in order to, you know, use your weapons, you have to actually expose yourself to fire from the enemy. You can't spend too long sitting behind cover. You have to be able to seize the initiative at some point. If you're not luring the enemy in for a trap, then spending all day behind cover simply means that you'll be picked off one by one by the enemy that has gained command of the field.
And when you expose yourself to fire - unless you're running like a bat out of hell in a Jenner - you're going to find 4+ppcs deposited into a single point on your torso. A gauss round or two might connect elsewhere (if you're lucky - they'll just remove your arm).
It's getting pretty bad - to the point where people are using completely silly armor builds to try and counter the problem. I've run into several brawlers in my Jenner that have virtually no armor on their rear torso. I mean I just rake my lasers across them and I'm into their internals.
Why?
Because, most of the time, they are up against heavies and assaults that cannot capitalize on exposed flanks - yet they can also put stupid amounts of pinpoint damage onto one's armor. It's become turrett battles. Exactly what PGI said they were trying to move Mech Warrior away from.
Very well said.
#34
Posted 01 June 2013 - 04:31 PM
#35
Posted 01 June 2013 - 04:40 PM
IV Amen, on 01 June 2013 - 03:45 PM, said:
What is your point? Stalker and Atlai has no jumpjets.
Treb poptarts were a pain in the *** also. Need BV or tonnage limits to make them a pain again.
That's the thing. "Poptarting" was a harassing game. So you take a PPC or two to the torso. Just dangerous enough to cause you to have to switch up your plans. You can't ignore the jumper - but you can't really afford to chase him down over it, either, as that's the game he wants you to play.
A highlander jumps up with 3 PPCs and a gauss rifle - and it's a different story. That's some serious firepower being put on you.
There's literally no difference between using "poptarting" and standing still.... except for the fact that you can jump, fire, and drop behind cover (as if you were standing still) while your enemy has a moving target that has assault-class armor on it.
There should be an accuracy penalty that goes along with such tactics. There should be a reason why you would want to walk out in front of your enemy to get in a shot rather than jump-jet.
Sure - it's not going to keep people from doing it - but it wouldn't be so bad that the only way people see to counter it is to focus fire with 18 PPCs from their team.
The whole thing has gotten stupid.
#36
Posted 01 June 2013 - 04:57 PM
I can't wait for the screams of anguish.
#37
Posted 01 June 2013 - 04:59 PM
#40
Posted 01 June 2013 - 05:01 PM
What's a tiny shake going to do? Zilch. There should be a completely different 'convergence issue' associated with jump sniping. But then that just means grounded snipers and more 6 PPC stalkers. There needs to be some other measure to this that allows them to play their jump sniping game but without the pin-point accuracy it has.
Edited by Koniving, 01 June 2013 - 06:24 PM.
4 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users