Jump to content

Would You Pay To Remove Jj Shake?


30 replies to this topic

Poll: Would you pay MC to remove JJ shake (114 member(s) have cast votes)

Would you pay to remove JJ shake?

  1. Yes (20 votes [16.39%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 16.39%

  2. No (102 votes [83.61%] - View)

    Percentage of vote: 83.61%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#1 Bluemaxx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 115 posts
  • LocationAustralia....somewhere

Posted 11 June 2013 - 05:35 AM

Read the title, now vote!

#2 snowfalcon8

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 36 posts
  • LocationPerth Western Australia

Posted 11 June 2013 - 05:38 AM

what does J J mean though

#3 Bluemaxx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 115 posts
  • LocationAustralia....somewhere

Posted 11 June 2013 - 05:40 AM

jolly jumpers :)

#4 MustrumRidcully

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,644 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 05:41 AM

View Postsnowfalcon8, on 11 June 2013 - 05:38 AM, said:

what does J J mean though

Jeffry Jacobs. He created Alias and directed the new Startrek Movies.

I have no problem with his camera shake, but he might really overdo the lense flare a bit. But I wouldn't pay for having it removed (though I might still watch a movie where he tones it down. Maybe that constitutes paying for it?)

Edited by MustrumRidcully, 11 June 2013 - 05:42 AM.


#5 qwerty

    Member

  • PipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 39 posts
  • LocationAustralia

Posted 11 June 2013 - 05:43 AM

hell no it is to much pay to win as it is

#6 bloodnor

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 735 posts
  • Locationwarrington Cheshire UK

Posted 11 June 2013 - 07:48 AM

how would this work. would you have them charge us for giro-stabilization that all mechs already have built into there torso so there is no shake a technology we have already mastered in this day and age 2013. i don't use PPC and im not a POPTART but cam shake is a dumb idea sorry PGI my highlander agrees. just remover the shake but keep the aiming difficulties .

Edited by bloodnor, 11 June 2013 - 07:49 AM.


#7 Gaan Cathal

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Bridesmaid
  • Bridesmaid
  • 2,108 posts

Posted 11 June 2013 - 08:11 AM

I voted. You can't tell though, because the OP can't create a forum poll properly.

#8 One Medic Army

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,985 posts
  • LocationBay Area, California

Posted 11 June 2013 - 10:36 AM

Not only would I not, I would stop paying if others could, because then we'd go back to poptart wars while forcing people to pay to participate.

#9 Hotthedd

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The People's Hero
  • 3,213 posts
  • LocationDixie

Posted 11 June 2013 - 10:45 AM

No way!

One of my favorite parts of watching "Good Times" back in the '70s was watching JJ shake while saying "Dy-No-Mite!!".

#10 Mechteric

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 7,308 posts
  • LocationRTP, NC

Posted 11 June 2013 - 11:38 AM

dumb poll is dumb

#11 Bluemaxx

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Philanthropist
  • Philanthropist
  • 115 posts
  • LocationAustralia....somewhere

Posted 11 June 2013 - 02:47 PM

mmmm....that's right people, feed me your rage :D give into the dark side of pay to win

#12 Blue Footed Booby

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 393 posts
  • LocationHere?

Posted 11 June 2013 - 06:29 PM

Why yes, I think letting people pay money to completely game balanced tweaks is a FANTASTIC idea.

#13 Tekadept

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 1,290 posts
  • LocationPerth, Australia

Posted 11 June 2013 - 06:37 PM

Posted Image

#14 Typhoon Storm 2142

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 302 posts
  • LocationHamburg

Posted 11 June 2013 - 10:25 PM

View PostBluemaxx, on 11 June 2013 - 05:35 AM, said:

Read the title, now vote!


What a lame poll. I voted yes and no, because I could.

I would rather pay for a forum ban of the OP.

#15 The Gunman

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 220 posts
  • LocationLow Orbit

Posted 11 June 2013 - 11:30 PM

Voted 'yes' and 'no' because poll wasn't created properly.

#16 Skoaljaw

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Survivor
  • Survivor
  • 126 posts
  • LocationAnywhere, USA

Posted 12 June 2013 - 02:00 PM

I believe it is right where it needs to be. In the table top game there were severe penalties against your to-hit roll while jumping. To counter this in our game here, just pull the trigger as you are falling and not during the jump.

#17 ExtremeA79

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 351 posts
  • LocationTexas

Posted 12 June 2013 - 03:10 PM

View PostSkoaljaw, on 12 June 2013 - 02:00 PM, said:

I believe it is right where it needs to be. In the table top game there were severe penalties against your to-hit roll while jumping. To counter this in our game here, just pull the trigger as you are falling and not during the jump.

The penalties are simulating you jumping, moving while in air, then landing, while your enemy is moving. Thats what TT was simulating.

#18 Petroshka

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 235 posts

Posted 12 June 2013 - 03:12 PM

where is the option to pay to increase everyone's jj shake?

#19 OldScarab

    Rookie

  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3 posts
  • LocationBrisbane

Posted 12 June 2013 - 07:40 PM

They should keep it as it is now, but apply some Newtonian physics to jumpers so mechs firing ballistics would turn or spin depending on the force of released shot and distance of the barrel from the centre of mass...
Spinning mechs for everyone...

#20 Inkarnus

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Overlord
  • Overlord
  • 1,074 posts
  • LocationInner Sphere

Posted 13 June 2013 - 12:38 AM

voted no cuz obviously troll thread of a {Noble MechWarrior}





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users