Jump to content

Graphics Settings Gtx 650


10 replies to this topic

#1 One of Little Harmony

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • The Devoted
  • The Devoted
  • 159 posts

Posted 20 June 2013 - 04:40 PM

I have a Nvidia GTX650 that's attached to a i7-4770K. (Don't laugh)

What do you think my optimal graphics settings should be?

I'm getting like above 30 on average, with my lows like the high 20's.

View PostOne of Little Harmony, on 20 June 2013 - 04:40 PM, said:

I have a Nvidia GTX650 that's attached to a i7-4770K. (Don't laugh)

What do you think my optimal graphics settings should be?

I'm getting like above 30 on average, with my lows like the high 20's.


With settings on Very High.

#2 Badconduct

    Dezgra

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 364 posts

Posted 21 June 2013 - 06:15 AM

The 650 is Meh.. at best.

You will have to experiment with it to really get a good FPS. If you download MSI afterburner, you can track the FPS on screen while you play.

A 660, even a 570, would probably give much better performance. Keep in mind on here, the highlighted card is the 650 ti, which is a fair bit quicker.

Posted Image

Edited by Badconduct, 21 June 2013 - 06:15 AM.


#3 Oderint dum Metuant

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 4,758 posts
  • LocationUnited Kingdom

Posted 23 June 2013 - 06:20 AM

View PostOne of Little Harmony, on 20 June 2013 - 04:40 PM, said:

I have a Nvidia GTX650 that's attached to a i7-4770K. (Don't laugh)

What do you think my optimal graphics settings should be?

I'm getting like above 30 on average, with my lows like the high 20's,



With settings on Very High.


This was a premade built PC ?

Yea the 650 standard is pretty weak :/ , mid 20's is going to be about it.

#4 Catamount

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • LIEUTENANT, JUNIOR GRADE
  • 3,305 posts
  • LocationBoone, NC

Posted 23 June 2013 - 06:28 AM

View PostOne of Little Harmony, on 20 June 2013 - 04:40 PM, said:

What do you think my optimal graphics settings should be?


Well since you won't be CPU bound until you get your fps a lot higher, basically leave anti-aliasing alone and otherwise just start turning settings down until the fps is acceptable to you. "Optimal" is somewhat subjective; it just depends on how much graphical quality you're willing to sacrifice for framerate. Once you hit a framerate you can live with and don't want the graphics any lower, you've hit the optimal settings.

#5 Smokeyjedi

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Liquid Metal
  • Liquid Metal
  • 1,040 posts
  • LocationCanada

Posted 23 June 2013 - 10:46 AM

believe it or not...... the GeForce experience will tweak things quite heavily In a direction......A few times ive actually tried it out with my GTX460 256bit 1GB the way it wants...

#6 Gremlich Johns

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The 1 Percent
  • The 1 Percent
  • 3,855 posts
  • LocationMaryland, USA

Posted 23 June 2013 - 02:25 PM

I'd get a GTX 560 instead

#7 red stapler

    Member

  • Pip
  • 17 posts
  • LocationNashville, TN

Posted 24 June 2013 - 10:07 AM

View PostOne of Little Harmony, on 20 June 2013 - 04:40 PM, said:

What do you think my optimal graphics settings should be?


The 650 is comparable to my 550Ti and should run well (50-60FPS) at medium settings with antialiasing off.

#8 Badconduct

    Dezgra

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 364 posts

Posted 24 June 2013 - 05:38 PM

View Postred stapler, on 24 June 2013 - 10:07 AM, said:


The 650 is comparable to my 550Ti and should run well (50-60FPS) at medium settings with antialiasing off.


at 640x480

#9 red stapler

    Member

  • Pip
  • 17 posts
  • LocationNashville, TN

Posted 25 June 2013 - 04:10 AM

View PostBadconduct, on 24 June 2013 - 05:38 PM, said:


at 640x480


It's not that bad, I run at 1600x900.

#10 Badconduct

    Dezgra

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • 364 posts

Posted 25 June 2013 - 04:31 AM

View Postred stapler, on 25 June 2013 - 04:10 AM, said:


It's not that bad, I run at 1600x900.

Posted Image

#11 v4skunk

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPip
  • Veteran Founder
  • Veteran Founder
  • 178 posts

Posted 06 July 2013 - 11:10 AM

View PostGremlich Johns, on 23 June 2013 - 02:25 PM, said:

I'd get a GTX 560 instead

LOL that card is over 2 years old.
OP get a 7870XT, 7950 or a GTX760.





4 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 4 guests, 0 anonymous users