Jump to content

@ Paul Inouye : Why Did You Nerf The Large Pulse Lasers?


306 replies to this topic

Poll: @ Paul Inouye : Why Did You Nerf The Large Pulse Lasers? (305 member(s) have cast votes)

Do you want to know why Paul did nerf the LPL?

  1. Yes. (241 votes [79.02%])

    Percentage of vote: 79.02%

  2. No. (50 votes [16.39%])

    Percentage of vote: 16.39%

  3. Other (explain) (14 votes [4.59%])

    Percentage of vote: 4.59%

Vote Guests cannot vote

#181 jeffsw6

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,258 posts
  • LocationLouisville, KY (suburbs)

Posted 10 July 2013 - 04:45 AM

Who really cares since the only useful mech is the STK-3F ...

#182 keith

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,272 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 04:49 AM

View Postjeffsw6, on 10 July 2013 - 04:45 AM, said:

Who really cares since the only useful mech is the STK-3F ...


they made it that way, and it such a shame the game was so fun back in CB. u could do everything and do all the tactics. even snipe even though u had no zoom...

#183 MustrumRidcully

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,644 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 05:58 AM

Maybe the answer is just:
"Because he can".

No one can dispute that.

#184 WolvesX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Machete
  • The Machete
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 10:09 AM

View PostMustrumRidcully, on 10 July 2013 - 05:58 AM, said:

Maybe the answer is just:
"Because he can".

No one can dispute that.

:rolleyes:

#185 bucurmish

    Member

  • PipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • Elite Founder
  • 54 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 10:33 AM

View PostWolvesX, on 10 July 2013 - 10:09 AM, said:

:rolleyes:


I wish we could dispute that . Sadly this thread has 100% more chances of being closed before the next balance patch than Paul answering us.

#186 Dreamslave

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 627 posts
  • LocationUpstate New York

Posted 10 July 2013 - 10:37 AM

LPL's were rarely used in any of the thousands of matches I've played before the nerf. I haven't seen a single LPL since the nerf. And I've been looking. GG PGI, GG.

#187 MustrumRidcully

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 10,644 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 10:42 AM

View PostDreamslave, on 10 July 2013 - 10:37 AM, said:

LPL's were rarely used in any of the thousands of matches I've played before the nerf. I haven't seen a single LPL since the nerf. And I've been looking. GG PGI, GG.

I have an idea...

Let'S just replace the PPC and the LPL stats and vice versa! You don't eve have to change the color!

This way, we've solved the problem of PPC stalkers overnight, and LPLs are useful again!

Edited by MustrumRidcully, 10 July 2013 - 10:43 AM.


#188 SgtMaster

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Knight Errant
  • Knight Errant
  • 247 posts
  • LocationMontreal

Posted 10 July 2013 - 10:47 AM

i think they did it to have everyone just use the ppc's...

much easier game to learn if everyone is using 1 mech and only 1 weapon type...

#189 SirLANsalot

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Legendary Founder
  • Legendary Founder
  • 1,540 posts
  • LocationWashington State

Posted 10 July 2013 - 10:49 AM

Pulse Lasers are being Normalized, and theres only been one pass on them. We have no idea what they are bring normalized TO, but at least there getting reworked. (This they all said IN THE PATCH, and in the COMMAND CHAIR posts)

Personally I LOVE the new damage numbers from the LPL, and hope to see them up there damage in total, and quicken the damage dealt. Heat (as always) should be the drawback factor of ANY energy weapon, its what keeps them in check vs the other types. Normal PPC needs to go back to its 9 heat and the ER back to its 13. Then the LPL will look quite enticing, and the PPC OMG YOUR A NOOB Apocalypse can come to an end.

#190 Deathlike

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Littlest Helper
  • Littlest Helper
  • 29,240 posts
  • Location#NOToTaterBalance #BadBalanceOverlordIsBad

Posted 10 July 2013 - 11:17 AM

View PostMustrumRidcully, on 10 July 2013 - 10:42 AM, said:

I have an idea...

Let'S just replace the PPC and the LPL stats and vice versa! You don't eve have to change the color!

This way, we've solved the problem of PPC stalkers overnight, and LPLs are useful again!


Well, at least LPLs would actually be boated properly.

#191 kesuga7

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Challenger
  • The Challenger
  • 1,022 posts
  • LocationSegmentum solar - Sector solar - Subsector sol - Hive world - "Holy terra"

Posted 10 July 2013 - 11:19 AM

i never asked for this

or did anyone else

#192 jeffsw6

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,258 posts
  • LocationLouisville, KY (suburbs)

Posted 10 July 2013 - 11:35 AM

View PostSirLANsalot, on 10 July 2013 - 10:49 AM, said:

Personally I LOVE the new damage numbers from the LPL, and hope to see them up there damage in total, and quicken the damage dealt.

Why? It got a miniscule damage increase and a not-as-miniscule heat increase, taking away its status as the dmg/heat leader among energy-weapons.

The LPL change was stupid. I'll read your reasoning for why you disagree, but in the context of all the other weapons having many advantages over it, I don't see why you would want to use an LPL on any build.

#193 Gallowglas

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Ace Of Spades
  • Ace Of Spades
  • 1,690 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 11:44 AM

I'm pretty sure it's because they wanted to collect and parse data with normalized numbers before deciding how, and what, they need to adjust.

#194 WolvesX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Machete
  • The Machete
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 11:44 AM

View Postjeffsw6, on 10 July 2013 - 11:35 AM, said:

Why? It got a miniscule damage increase and a not-as-miniscule heat increase, taking away its status as the dmg/heat leader among energy-weapons.

The LPL change was stupid. I'll read your reasoning for why you disagree, but in the context of all the other weapons having many advantages over it, I don't see why you would want to use an LPL on any build.

Maybe he means DMG is ok, but heat far to high.

Like 7.3 Heat with 10.6 dmg.

#195 kesuga7

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Challenger
  • The Challenger
  • 1,022 posts
  • LocationSegmentum solar - Sector solar - Subsector sol - Hive world - "Holy terra"

Posted 10 July 2013 - 11:52 AM

View PostGallowglas, on 10 July 2013 - 11:44 AM, said:

I'm pretty sure it's because they wanted to collect and parse data with normalized numbers before deciding how, and what, they need to adjust.


wowzer good post lol

#196 WolvesX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Machete
  • The Machete
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 10 July 2013 - 11:55 AM

View Postkesuga7, on 10 July 2013 - 11:52 AM, said:


wowzer good post lol

You can't collect data if no one uses them because they are terrible.

No serious player is going to use them.

So you get BAD data instead.

#197 WolvesX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Machete
  • The Machete
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 11 July 2013 - 02:35 AM

EDIT: sry for double post.

Edited by WolvesX, 11 July 2013 - 02:36 AM.


#198 jeffsw6

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 1,258 posts
  • LocationLouisville, KY (suburbs)

Posted 11 July 2013 - 04:42 AM

View PostGallowglas, on 10 July 2013 - 11:44 AM, said:

I'm pretty sure it's because they wanted to collect and parse data with normalized numbers before deciding how, and what, they need to adjust.

View PostWolvesX, on 10 July 2013 - 11:55 AM, said:

You can't collect data if no one uses them because they are terrible.

Let me elaborate on WolvesX's post.

PGI doesn't even understand which weapons are good and which aren't. If the Machine Gun issue didn't demonstrate that clearly, the LPL adjustment certainly does. They do not know why good players find themselves forced into PPC/Gauss builds and away from anything resembling a short-range, brawler build.

They don't understand that the data they are getting from all weapons, except PPC/Gauss, is bad.

Bad data is worse than no data at all. It can either be discarded entirely, or it can be used to draw incorrect conclusions. PGI continues to draw incorrect conclusions about game-play.

There can be no reason why they adjusted LPL, other than their ignorance.

#199 Victor Morson

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Elite Founder
  • 6,370 posts
  • LocationAnder's Moon

Posted 11 July 2013 - 05:07 AM

View Postjeffsw6, on 11 July 2013 - 04:42 AM, said:

Let me elaborate on WolvesX's post.

PGI doesn't even understand which weapons are good and which aren't. If the Machine Gun issue didn't demonstrate that clearly, the LPL adjustment certainly does. They do not know why good players find themselves forced into PPC/Gauss builds and away from anything resembling a short-range, brawler build.

They don't understand that the data they are getting from all weapons, except PPC/Gauss, is bad.

Bad data is worse than no data at all. It can either be discarded entirely, or it can be used to draw incorrect conclusions. PGI continues to draw incorrect conclusions about game-play.

There can be no reason why they adjusted LPL, other than their ignorance.


And importantly, they refuse the help of the people who could help them, pretty much. It's a vicious circle.

#200 WolvesX

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • The Machete
  • The Machete
  • 2,072 posts

Posted 11 July 2013 - 06:55 AM

View PostVictor Morson, on 11 July 2013 - 05:07 AM, said:


And importantly, they refuse the help of the people who could help them, pretty much. It's a vicious circle.

And that bring up an other question:

Why do they refuse the help? Many volks are able and willing!





1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users