Why? Because that's the best way PGI could come up with so players of lesser skill don't feel like they're being crushed without being given a chance to learn. You don't learn much when you walk out and take PPCs/NoobKill LRMs to the face.
However, perhaps the problem is worth examining in greater detail.
Is the problem really that noobs get crushed?
Or is it because they get crushed in a way that does not allow them to learn, and is also remarkably not fun?
Would it be then worth considering that if we removed ELO, so noobs had to fight these same pros that were beating them, BUT everyone was in stock mechs, so noobs would likely at least get a fight in, they may still have fun?
The proposal:
If you run a stock mech, your ELO does not apply, only weight matching. You are only matched against others in stock mechs, or basic/noob ELO.
Anticipated result:
More people run stock mechs, instead of min/maxed builds. We get messier, but more 'fun' games, for pro and noob alike. ELO is dubious at the best of times anyway, so it'd be difficult for this proposed change to make things worse.
Disclosure:
I enjoy min/max, PPC Stalker/Poptart Online as much as the next person. But honestly speaking I play plenty of that in serious 8v8 competition. I'd like to have something different/fun to play when I'm actually looking to relax.
Edited by Valore, 04 July 2013 - 06:49 PM.