jakucha, on 05 July 2013 - 07:22 PM, said:
Nice game balance thread guys, I can see why the devs take you seriously.
As seriously as we take their game balance attempts.
0
Large Pulse Laser Needs A Nerf...
Started by WolvesX, Jul 05 2013 10:14 AM
25 replies to this topic
#21
-
-
- 2,183 posts
Member
- LocationToronto
Posted 06 July 2013 - 06:25 AM
As seriously as we take their game balance attempts.
#22
-
-
- Overlord
- 427 posts
Member
Posted 06 July 2013 - 06:34 AM
GaussDragon, on 06 July 2013 - 06:25 AM, said:
As seriously as we take their game balance attempts.
Bit hard when most of the feedback on the forums is worthless. Delete yourself.
#23
-
-
- Legendary Founder
- 10,644 posts
Member
Posted 06 July 2013 - 06:34 AM
Deathlike, on 05 July 2013 - 10:56 AM, said:
Wub wub wub your boat
Gently down the stream.
Merrily merrily merrily
Balance is but a dream!
Gently down the stream.
Merrily merrily merrily
Balance is but a dream!
Brilliant.
#24
-
-
- Legendary Founder
- 6,733 posts
Member
- LocationWisconsin, USA
Posted 06 July 2013 - 07:15 AM
While I'll not add to the troll value of this thread (it has plenty of its own, fun read) I will say that PGI doesn't have a great track record of reading well though-out posts.
The "official" ECM thread was littered with a billion and a half GOOD ideas with thought behind them, from all around the game (newer players and veteran players)
After 60+ pages of ideas, PGI removed the IFF interference and attached a hardpoint to ECM..
After that.. never did or will do a very long and thought out post. (I spent 3 hours just writing the idea post after discussing it in a thread with others... and that got nothing- never again.)
If MWO is going to fail, it will be entirely on PGI.. the players really have no say on the direction or balance.
The "official" ECM thread was littered with a billion and a half GOOD ideas with thought behind them, from all around the game (newer players and veteran players)
After 60+ pages of ideas, PGI removed the IFF interference and attached a hardpoint to ECM..
After that.. never did or will do a very long and thought out post. (I spent 3 hours just writing the idea post after discussing it in a thread with others... and that got nothing- never again.)
If MWO is going to fail, it will be entirely on PGI.. the players really have no say on the direction or balance.
#25
-
-
- The Resolute
- 500 posts
Member
- LocationThe Fresh River City
Posted 06 July 2013 - 07:57 PM
this applies?
#26
Posted 06 July 2013 - 11:38 PM
Livewyr, on 06 July 2013 - 07:15 AM, said:
While I'll not add to the troll value of this thread (it has plenty of its own, fun read) I will say that PGI doesn't have a great track record of reading well though-out posts.
The "official" ECM thread was littered with a billion and a half GOOD ideas with thought behind them, from all around the game (newer players and veteran players)
After 60+ pages of ideas, PGI removed the IFF interference and attached a hardpoint to ECM..
After that.. never did or will do a very long and thought out post. (I spent 3 hours just writing the idea post after discussing it in a thread with others... and that got nothing- never again.)
If MWO is going to fail, it will be entirely on PGI.. the players really have no say on the direction or balance.
The "official" ECM thread was littered with a billion and a half GOOD ideas with thought behind them, from all around the game (newer players and veteran players)
After 60+ pages of ideas, PGI removed the IFF interference and attached a hardpoint to ECM..
After that.. never did or will do a very long and thought out post. (I spent 3 hours just writing the idea post after discussing it in a thread with others... and that got nothing- never again.)
If MWO is going to fail, it will be entirely on PGI.. the players really have no say on the direction or balance.
I read fail as in Jail. The first thing that came to mind is not to drop the soap.
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
