Remove The Lousy Pretty Baby Quirk And Add One Hardpoint.
#61
Posted 23 August 2013 - 08:09 AM
The Awesome in general needs help, and the Pretty Baby really needs to be the most maneuverable of all the Awesomes vs. have deceleration like a barge. It also needs better hardpoints - no idea what's with Awesomes and laughable hardpoints, especially tiny missile slots.
#62
Posted 23 August 2013 - 11:53 AM
#63
Posted 23 August 2013 - 05:02 PM
#64
Posted 24 August 2013 - 11:26 AM
It needs the deceleration quirk removed, and needs it's acceleration and twist speed maxed the F out, so that it can be the only assault capable of outrunning LRM volleys.
#65
Posted 03 October 2013 - 01:25 AM
There is noway you can say that adding a extra hard point to the PB is pay to win. the porks head has 8 hard points and is allowed to equip a big engine. Pb only has 6 hard points incase you forgot.
WHYWHYWHYWHYWHY does the PB get three nerfs?!?!?!?!?!?
deceleration reduction, reduced hard points, no extra modules or torso twist.
FIX THE PRETTY BABY PLEASE!
#66
Posted 03 October 2013 - 09:43 AM
#67
Posted 03 October 2013 - 09:57 AM
That's why we can't have nice things.
#68
Posted 03 October 2013 - 10:20 AM
#69
Posted 03 October 2013 - 10:54 AM
i totally agree. the standard 8 series are way better in every way.
i only want the pb to be on par not sub par or op. pgi igp devs wtf.. fix it please
Edited by King Arthur IV, 03 October 2013 - 11:38 AM.
#70
Posted 03 October 2013 - 11:07 AM
General Taskeen, on 21 July 2013 - 07:05 PM, said:
Every mech has that installed already; It's called the incoming missile warning.
#71
Posted 03 October 2013 - 11:10 AM
That at least kind of balances that specific nerf. Adding another harpoint and making the missle tubes in the LA completely modular would get my thumbs up of approval.
#72
Posted 03 October 2013 - 12:28 PM
The video is a bit misleading making it seem like the PB had some special types of lasers, LRM15, and PPC. In most of these encounters you know it wasn't the PB who would win.
Wow! Did you see that Medium Laser? No I don't want my money back, I want the Pretty Baby to have competitive hardpoints and be the 'mech it is in the video. A modular left Missile arm is great and add another energy hardpoint to the right arm or left torso. That would give it some flexibility to be more than an SRM boat.
One more thing! Danielle Peterson of Chisolm's Raiders was famed for piloting the Pretty Baby with unatural agility. So why does the PB have the deceleration quirk? How could it be agile if it couldn't slow down? The quirk defies the lore of the mech.
Edited by Lightfoot, 03 October 2013 - 12:40 PM.
#73
Posted 10 October 2013 - 03:16 AM
was on jenny craig's diet for 6 weeks and was looking fab.
#74
Posted 10 October 2013 - 07:10 AM
What the PB needs is to be able to carry enough hard hitting pinpoint weapons with enough heat efficiency to be able to compete with the other Assault mechs, all of which can carry low heat, high damage ballistic load outs.
#75
Posted 10 October 2013 - 08:32 AM
NRP, on 10 October 2013 - 07:10 AM, said:
What the PB needs is to be able to carry enough hard hitting pinpoint weapons with enough heat efficiency to be able to compete with the other Assault mechs, all of which can carry low heat, high damage ballistic load outs.
QFT
All the Awesomes, including the Pretty Baby should have the quirk that they get better cooling to counter the effects of Heat Scale, DHS at abnormal 1.4 rating, and ERPPCs at normal 15 heat rating.
This because they all lack the ability to carry the cool running Ballistics which all the heat nerfs have made required equipment for Assault level mechs. The Ballistic weapon in essence acts like 5 full 2.0 double heatsinks, which you can't fit on the Awesome, would be like 30 DHS 1.4's.
We need faster Mech fixes when the game is changed by upgrades like HSR, or drastic nerfs like DHS 1.4, Heat Scale, heat boosted PPCs and ERPPCs. Ignoring these problems makes players question buying more Mechs for fear they will not be supported when bugs and imbalances eliminate them from competition.
#77
Posted 10 October 2013 - 09:16 AM
1 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users
























