Jump to content

Fix The Awesome!


23 replies to this topic

#21 General Taskeen

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 5,737 posts
  • LocationCircinus

Posted 29 July 2013 - 02:48 PM

View PostBartholomew bartholomew, on 29 July 2013 - 02:36 PM, said:

Give them WAY more heat sinks so it can do the boating it was designed from the ground up for. Some mechs were specifically design for some things.


More heatsinks doesn't solve hitbox problems on any Mech with hitbox problems. And it is more than just the Awesome, but the Awesome is the best example of it, since it is an Assault Mech.

#22 Chief Ten Beers

    Member

  • Pip
  • The Bludgeon
  • The Bludgeon
  • 11 posts

Posted 29 July 2013 - 02:52 PM

I really wanted to get an awesome, but I keep hearing really bad things about it. Is it really that bad?

#23 Bartholomew bartholomew

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPipPipPip
  • Urban Commando
  • Urban Commando
  • 1,250 posts
  • LocationInner sphere drop point

Posted 29 July 2013 - 02:55 PM

They are pretty easy to knock down even in a medium.

View PostGeneral Taskeen, on 29 July 2013 - 02:48 PM, said:


More heatsinks doesn't solve hitbox problems on any Mech with hitbox problems. And it is more than just the Awesome, but the Awesome is the best example of it, since it is an Assault Mech.


true, it needs work bigtime

#24 Big Giant Head

    Member

  • PipPipPipPipPipPip
  • 258 posts
  • Locationingalaxyfarfaraway

Posted 29 July 2013 - 10:52 PM

View PostTice Daurus, on 29 July 2013 - 08:45 AM, said:

I don't know if wide is the problem. Sure the Awesome is wide, I'll give you that, But it's width + the hit boxes are the problem. Fix the hit boxes, and you could make the Awesome more viable. Remember the Awesome was supposed to be somewhat wide, but I will agree, this design makes the Awesome like a giant barn door.


Yeah
If you just change hitboxes thats not enough because it is still easy to hit. He is large as in object size

Edited by Big Giant Head, 29 July 2013 - 10:53 PM.






1 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users