

Quality of the starter set
#21
Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:33 AM
As stated the premium mechs are very detailed and nice. The other 22 are pretty primitively cast, but can be cleaned up, detailed and finished nicely.
What really stands out here is the quality of the rulebooks, maps and other print materail. FASA could have taken a lesson from CGL on this. One of the more professionally produced games that I have seen.
#22
Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:47 AM
As a former owner of the box set [unfortenately my mini's were stolen along with my warhammer 40K space marine army when my army case was stolen] I can tell you that yes... the standard mech's can feel a bit, cheap.
However honestly, what can you expect for a 50 dollar starter set?
The CBT plastic mechs have always suffered from quality issues [the exclusion being the 2 premium quality mechs... the Loki and Thor that come with the 25th anniversary box set] However, while they may not be the prettiest things around... they ARE a good ammount of mechs for a start.
check out www.ironwindmetals.com for the actual metal models. You'll notice even some of the metal models, like the Atlas, seems a bit, spindly. and really doesn't convey the mass of these mechs. but the quality of the casts have gotten better.
If you're interested in painting... you can actually make the starter mechs look decent. it just takes a bit of time and effort.
#23
Posted 15 June 2012 - 05:51 AM
Jade Kitsune, on 15 June 2012 - 05:47 AM, said:
As a former owner of the box set [unfortenately my mini's were stolen along with my warhammer 40K space marine army when my army case was stolen] I can tell you that yes... the standard mech's can feel a bit, cheap.
However honestly, what can you expect for a 50 dollar starter set?
The CBT plastic mechs have always suffered from quality issues [the exclusion being the 2 premium quality mechs... the Loki and Thor that come with the 25th anniversary box set] However, while they may not be the prettiest things around... they ARE a good ammount of mechs for a start.
check out www.ironwindmetals.com for the actual metal models. You'll notice even some of the metal models, like the Atlas, seems a bit, spindly. and really doesn't convey the mass of these mechs. but the quality of the casts have gotten better.
If you're interested in painting... you can actually make the starter mechs look decent. it just takes a bit of time and effort.
And they give a nice detailed painting/preparation guide with the set. Good stuff.
Anyone remember the plastic mechs that came out in the late eighties? Man those were some quality casts and they were hefty, even for plastic sets.
#24
Posted 15 June 2012 - 06:49 AM
#25
Posted 15 June 2012 - 08:37 AM


Im just saying that I found many people saying online that they had broken models, models with holes in them or downright missing models in the kits.
For the mechs themselves (not models but lookswise) there are 11 in there that id want in my collection for looks or awesomeness alone


What I liked as well is that theres a good balance between light, medium, heavy and assault mechs


I made 3 lances (scout, combat and command) out of mechs that I figured would work well. No idea if it works on the TT but the beginner set is helping me a great deal as I need to buy 3 more mechs total to get the lane in working order


Scout: 2 Commandos, Hollander and Bushwacker
Combat: Awesome, Bushwacker, Centurion and Hunchback
Command: Atlas, Catapult, Mauler and Zeus

#26
Posted 15 June 2012 - 08:44 AM
#27
Posted 16 June 2012 - 04:15 PM
Hmmm just found out on the battletech wiki that 3 lances are a company


So anyone have any comment on that company that I posted above? Is it versatile enough on the TT?
#28
Posted 16 June 2012 - 04:35 PM
Or course yeah the starter ones just... well I was excited about the starter set until I turned it over and saw the pictures, they told me enough. While there never was a MW4 edition of the mini's I could agree a MWO set would still be good. Some of these have made mediocre mechs look decent.
#29
Posted 16 June 2012 - 09:26 PM
Demoulius, on 16 June 2012 - 04:15 PM, said:
We bought new renditions of the models from Iron Wind and started using those as opposed to their plastic counterparts. We still have them, but they just sit all alone in the box unless we need multiples or feel bad for them (which, I admit, I do sometimes).
#30
Posted 17 June 2012 - 01:58 AM



Then again ive been wrong in the past

Citadel is also producing abit different minis. In ironwinds defense I think they tried to make some of these mechs look boxy and like the artworks


Speaking of easy conversion: Jagermech, cut the arms off and point them to the front. Done?

#31
Posted 17 June 2012 - 04:07 AM
Karyudo ds, on 16 June 2012 - 04:35 PM, said:
Or course yeah the starter ones just... well I was excited about the starter set until I turned it over and saw the pictures, they told me enough. While there never was a MW4 edition of the mini's I could agree a MWO set would still be good. Some of these have made mediocre mechs look decent.
As a player of both 40K and Battletech, I want my battletech as is, [though HQ plastic casts of the metal models would be nice]
my main issue with Citadel is their pricing... because Games Workshop are a bunch of money grubbing aholes.
Despite that... I will agree some of the metal models even look... derptastic? still... Iron Wind is my favorite model maker... Citadel takes second there.
#32
Posted 17 June 2012 - 05:14 AM
Demoulius, on 17 June 2012 - 01:58 AM, said:


I haven't seen Citadel's stuff (I try to avoid Citadel completely because they're an evil regime of a company), but yeah Iron Wind tries to mirror the TRO images as best as possible.
I think the best area for comparison with the plastics as opposed to the Metals is definitely the Catapult. The plastic one looks terribly... malnourished.
#33
Posted 17 June 2012 - 10:14 AM
The scales between the 2 gaming systems are completly off the scale however so imho you cant really compare the 2

That said from what ive seen the mechs are mostly suffering from skinny arms and legs, nothing that some bulking up with greenstuff or other putty cant solve

How easy are the mechs to convert to other variants though? Mind I dont know which variants excist but if one sports a PPC in its arm as opposed to a medium large previously adding a tube like arm doesent like such a hard conversion to make

#34
Posted 17 June 2012 - 04:21 PM
Also, my little group quickly grew tired of the 3039 era mechs provided. We toyed with the omnis and now we always play clan vs IS. Or Clan on Clan.
For one, clan mechs actually look cool, and their weapons are far more interesting. We also love using some of he cool battlemechs not in the box such as the Battlemaster, Griffin, Crab and Zeus-X.
#35
Posted 17 June 2012 - 04:57 PM
Demoulius, on 17 June 2012 - 10:14 AM, said:

I have never once attempted to build a certain variant of a mech, so unfortunately I don't know.

#36
Posted 18 June 2012 - 01:05 AM

And yea the Crab is AWESOME! Was my fave mech from mechwarrior 2 mercs (my first ever mech game



#37
Posted 18 June 2012 - 05:33 AM
#38
Posted 18 June 2012 - 07:24 AM
Demoulius, on 18 June 2012 - 01:05 AM, said:

And yea the Crab is AWESOME! Was my fave mech from mechwarrior 2 mercs (my first ever mech game



Crab was a Star League mech and is mostly used by Comstar...however they did lend/give/sell a batch of Crab's and other Star league era mechs (from the 2750 tech read out) to House Kurita for the War of 3039. Crab became a workhorse in the Draconis Combine even getting a variant with a c3slave system in it. So to answer your question...yeah still around even in the Jihad era.
#39
Posted 18 June 2012 - 09:48 AM

Or a merc company?

Isent Comstar the dropship company though? Why do they have mechs of their own?

#40
Posted 18 June 2012 - 09:57 AM
Demoulius, on 18 June 2012 - 09:48 AM, said:

Or a merc company?

Correct. Except in some extreme examples, any faction can find itself in posession of pretty much any unit due to various reasons.
Demoulius, on 18 June 2012 - 09:48 AM, said:

Their business is the HPG network, not DropShips. As for 'Mechs, well, it's because they also happen to be a huge interstellar conspiracy in addition to being a phone company.
Edited by Arctic Fox, 18 June 2012 - 09:58 AM.
2 user(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 2 guests, 0 anonymous users