Xeno Phalcon, on 08 August 2013 - 06:16 AM, said:
A good example of the shift in tactics can be represented in the retrofiting of my BJ-1 Blackjack, prior to the patch I was using a 225 standard 2mguns, 1LL and 3 ML. Tended flank, shoo lights off base caps and rescue heavier mechs from jenners, though I was especially fond of picking fights with bigger mechs I knew I could use speed and jump jets to get the upper hand on.
Now im having more fun with the standard 180 engine, two ML and a fat AC20 and tend to cruise just BEHIND the frontline of the herd, often moving to the side to intercept flankers and dirtplant lights (im REALLY fond of jagermechs and cataphracts though, who always seem to have a XL engine and always seem to be looking the other direction -.^)
I've done almost the same thing. Went from using an HBK-4P almost exclusively (one a ML boat, the other 3x PPCs), to dusting off my Flame and loading it with an AC/20. Basically playing it like a faster HBK-4G with no big hunch. Enjoying blindsiding Jags and Phracts as well.
Delas Ting Usee, on 09 August 2013 - 08:41 PM, said:
Yes, definitely.
MPLs do one point of damage more and (correct me if I'm wrong) produces more heat.
But more telling, it weights 2 tons.
If I had a mech that had 2 energy slots I rather use ML cause I'll be able to fire more often than say MPL without the fear of overheating in the midst of combat.
Also, the 2 ton savings with MLs will usually go to heat sinks or more ammo.
This is just my opinion, anyone else?
They're almost worth using. 0.5sec duration and they'd be fine. They're hotter and heavier but it's easier and faster to put the damage on a single location, which is nice if you have a fast mech, or if your target is fast. If you can handle the heat they're the superior weapon.